Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#283 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
6.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
-41% greener
B

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 223 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

45
Q4
39
'27 Q1
40
'27 Q2
34
'27 Q3
32
'27 Q4
30
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 648 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
250 MANTA NILGUN
IMO 9553024
33,671 2011
6.1
B
249 STAR ISTIND
IMO 9182954
46,428 1999
6.1
B
253 IVS SPARROWHAWK
IMO 9712656
33,421 2014
6.1
B
254 ERNST OLDENDORFF
IMO 9702637
38,599 2015
6.2
B
255 BERGE DAISETSU
IMO 9713179
34,533 2015
6.2
B
257 IVS THANDA
IMO 9701009
37,715 2015
6.2
B
256 STAR GATE
IMO 9400875
32,280 2009
6.2
B
258 TEAL BAY
IMO 9343637
32,327 2007
6.2
B
259 SSI MAGNIFICENT
IMO 9391828
32,258 2009
6.2
B
261 ISOLDANA
IMO 9186235
44,691 2000
6.2
B
260 UBC TILBURY
IMO 9416721
37,702 2010
6.2
B
262 CENDA
IMO 9263071
46,834 2004
6.2
B
264 BASIC ISLAND
IMO 9640061
38,037 2012
6.2
B
263 IVS KNOT
IMO 9459137
33,143 2010
6.2
B
265 V TAURUS
IMO 9496161
33,193 2010
6.2
B
266 SUPERNOVA B
IMO 9610212
36,261 2012
6.2
B
268 ERLYNE
IMO 9382736
50,640 2010
6.2
B
267 TIAN ZHEN
IMO 9722728
38,007 2016
6.2
B
269 BAM PROTEUS
IMO 9343625
33,782 2007
6.3
B
270 IMPRESSION BAY
IMO 9722431
37,470 2015
6.3
B
271 NEPTULUS
IMO 9473705
33,706 2012
6.3
B
272 UBC SANTOS
IMO 9376000
31,569 2008
6.3
B
273 COOL BREEZE
IMO 9400930
32,283 2010
6.3
B
274 UBC TAMPA
IMO 9416707
37,724 2009
6.3
B
275 ALBERTO TOPIC
IMO 9728473
34,356 2015
6.3
B
276 IRON LADY
IMO 9385099
32,283 2009
6.4
B
277 SIDER OLYMPIA
IMO 9641807
38,182 2013
6.4
B
278 ZIMRIDA
IMO 9380817
37,296 2008
6.4
B
281 JAUNTY JENNY
IMO 9539444
33,628 2012
6.4
B
280 BULK KING
IMO 9195298
49,999 1999
6.4
B
279 CYCLADIC SPIRE
IMO 9609330
32,976 2013
6.4
B
282 TEAM BRAVO
IMO 9539341
33,642 2012
6.4
B
283 STAR KILIMANJARO
IMO 9396139
49,862 2009
6.4
B
284 PRINCESSE OUI
IMO 9711913
33,375 2015
6.5
B
285 IRIDA GS
IMO 9614311
32,836 2013
6.5
B
286 BALKAN MARIN
IMO 9416434
38,070 2010
6.5
B
287 PETRA
IMO 9597630
33,688 2011
6.5
B
290 PARLA
IMO 9537977
35,732 2011
6.5
B
289 UBC SANTA MARTA
IMO 9380805
31,583 2008
6.5
B
288 NOVI
IMO 9424120
34,044 2011
6.5
B
291 TIAN FU
IMO 9704738
38,146 2015
6.5
B
292 SODA
IMO 9385221
19,230 2008
6.5
B
293 TIAN YOU
IMO 9823625
37,077 2018
6.5
B
295 SIDER ONDA
IMO 9700316
40,482 2015
6.5
B
294 V PEGASUS
IMO 9370422
33,248 2008
6.5
B
296 ORCUN C
IMO 9499436
33,358 2012
6.6
B
298 SARACA
IMO 9300764
37,832 2005
6.6
B
297 TIAN XI
IMO 9704764
38,098 2016
6.6
B
299 GLORIEUSE
IMO 9646429
38,338 2012
6.6
B
300 TIAN HUI
IMO 9774599
37,130 2017
6.6
B
Page 6 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.