Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,069 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
21.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
+114% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2051 DINA TRADER
IMO 9354442
868 TEU 2007
21.8
E
2052 VOHBURG
IMO 9287807
804 TEU 2005
21.9
E
2053 KRISTIN SCHEPERS
IMO 9404089
812 TEU 2008
21.9
E
2054 ILSE D
IMO 9514755
962 TEU 2010
21.9
E
2055 SONATA
IMO 9316103
1,102 TEU 2006
21.9
E
2056 X-PRESS ELBE
IMO 9483669
1,036 TEU 2010
21.9
E
2057 BG EMERALD
IMO 9803704
955 TEU 2018
22.0
E
2058 MONTE BRASIL
IMO 9083055
621 TEU 1994
22.0
E
2059 ELBSUN
IMO 9429261
880 TEU 2012
22.0
E
2060 ARNARFELL
IMO 9306005
908 TEU 2005
22.0
E
2061 WILHELM
IMO 9376050
868 TEU 2008
22.0
E
2062 BF PERCH
IMO 9437218
980 TEU 2007
22.1
E
2063 CT PACHUCA
IMO 9344253
750 TEU 2005
22.1
E
2064 MARTINE A
IMO 9020340
1,139 TEU 1993
22.1
E
2065 AVILA
IMO 9295529
855 TEU 2007
22.1
E
2066 ELBFEEDER
IMO 9388522
974 TEU 2008
22.1
E
2067 KATHERINE BORCHARD
IMO 9246530
868 TEU 2004
22.1
E
2068 MASTERY D
IMO 9301201
900 TEU 2006
22.2
E
2069 LINDA
IMO 9354325
908 TEU 2007
22.2
E
2070 PROS HOPE
IMO 9319557
1,100 TEU 2005
22.2
E
2071 SPICA J
IMO 9355460
850 TEU 2007
22.3
E
2072 MONTE DA GUIA
IMO 9123788
621 TEU 1995
22.4
E
2073 EDITH
IMO 9328625
750 TEU 2005
22.4
E
2074 WEC VAN EYCK
IMO 9365984
767 TEU 2009
22.5
E
2075 ERASMUS HOPE
IMO 9396634
1,338 TEU 2008
22.6
E
2076 MEDKON LUNA
IMO 9341976
698 TEU 2007
22.6
E
2077 MSC ANNE F
IMO 9347803
957 TEU 2007
22.6
E
2078 PEGASUS J
IMO 9355434
850 TEU 2006
22.6
E
2079 BJORG
IMO 9231834
868 TEU 2001
22.6
E
2080 ZIM NEW ZEALAND
IMO 9366471
1,155 TEU 2007
22.7
E
2081 FINE SCHEPERS
IMO 9323467
804 TEU 2006
22.7
E
2082 PICTOR
IMO 9371426
925 TEU 2009
22.7
E
2083 BF CARP
IMO 9437256
980 TEU 2009
22.9
E
2084 AMELIE BORCHARD
IMO 9242560
868 TEU 2002
22.9
E
2085 AQUARIUS
IMO 9328651
707 TEU 2005
22.9
E
2086 HMO LEADER
IMO 9169811
650 TEU 1997
22.9
E
2087 SYNETOS
IMO 9347774
916 TEU 2006
22.9
E
2088 RUTH
IMO 9376036
868 TEU 2008
23.0
E
2089 IPIOS
IMO 9359117
1,100 TEU 2006
23.1
E
2090 CONTSHIP ONO
IMO 9324978
1,118 TEU 2007
23.1
E
2091 MSC TALIA F
IMO 9308601
916 TEU 2005
23.1
E
2092 YERUPAJA
IMO 9412488
880 TEU 2010
23.1
E
2093 EINSTEIN
IMO 9483346
1,036 TEU 2012
23.1
E
2094 MSC LUNA F
IMO 9308625
916 TEU 2006
23.2
E
2095 PERSEUS
IMO 9129469
660 TEU 1996
23.2
E
2096 BF LETICIA
IMO 9266542
862 TEU 2003
23.2
E
2097 MSC SAGITTARIUS F
IMO 9491616
916 TEU 2012
23.3
E
2098 DEPE
IMO 9186405
658 TEU 1998
23.3
E
2099 CARLA
IMO 9319868
750 TEU 2004
23.4
E
2100 CONTSHIP JOY
IMO 9349174
925 TEU 2007
23.4
E
Page 42 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.