Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,754 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
16.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
+58% higher
E
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1751 OOCL RAUMA
IMO 9462794
1,425 TEU 2009
16.2
E
1752 MSC MARYLENA II
IMO 9169031
1,658 TEU 1998
16.3
E
1753 RMS MEL
IMO 9387607
698 TEU 2008
16.3
E
1754 WARNOW MASTER
IMO 9449833
1,496 TEU 2006
16.4
E
1755 AS FABIANA
IMO 9395109
1,284 TEU 2007
16.4
E
1756 CMA CGM KAILAS
IMO 9339545
1,860 TEU 2006
16.4
E
1757 SC MEDFORD
IMO 9275103
1,200 TEU 2004
16.4
E
1758 ATLANTIC NORTH
IMO 9236597
1,129 TEU 2002
16.4
E
1759 THETIS D
IMO 9372274
1,425 TEU 2009
16.4
E
1760 RACHEL BORCHARD
IMO 9212010
1,216 TEU 2000
16.5
E
1761 HEINRICH EHLER
IMO 9372200
1,425 TEU 2008
16.5
E
1762 MSC ESHA F
IMO 9004231
923 TEU 1993
16.5
E
1763 MSC MIA SUMMER II
IMO 9169067
1,658 TEU 1999
16.5
E
1764 BG RED
IMO 9976965
1,400 TEU 2024
16.6
E
1765 CMA CGM BLOSSOM
IMO 9962524
1,096 TEU 2023
16.6
E
1766 CMA CGM KOUROU
IMO 9845659
2,200 TEU 2020
16.6
E
1767 DHANU
IMO 9122473
1,730 TEU 2001
16.7
E
1768 MEDKON MERSIN
IMO 9430040
704 TEU 2008
16.7
E
1769 GRANDE MAROCCO
IMO 9437907
800 TEU 2010
16.7
E
1770 GRANDE ANGOLA
IMO 9343156
1,318 TEU 2008
16.7
E
1771 MSC HOGGAR
IMO 9286449
858 TEU 2004
16.8
E
1772 WEC JAN STEEN
IMO 9354416
868 TEU 2007
16.9
E
1773 RMS TEAM
IMO 9282170
1,076 TEU 2004
16.9
E
1774 HALSTED
IMO 9337262
2,824 TEU 2007
16.9
E
1775 JAN
IMO 9477335
1,350 TEU 2009
16.9
E
1776 MARBURG
IMO 9387592
880 TEU 2009
16.9
E
1777 GRANDE SIERRA LEONE
IMO 9437945
800 TEU 2011
17.0
E
1778 MSC ELKE F
IMO 9318773
830 TEU 2005
17.0
E
1779 BURAK BAYRAKTAR
IMO 9260536
858 TEU 2002
17.0
E
1780 CONTSHIP JET
IMO 9348625
1,267 TEU 2007
17.1
E
1781 MICHIGAN
IMO 9437139
1,284 TEU 2008
17.1
E
1782 ALEXANDER B
IMO 9328649
1,200 TEU 2006
17.1
E
1783 FIONA
IMO 9149885
1,698 TEU 1998
17.1
E
1784 ALANA
IMO 9297589
862 TEU 2004
17.1
E
1785 REPUBBLICA DEL BRASILE
IMO 9138422
1,520 TEU 1998
17.2
E
1786 GRANDE GABON
IMO 9437933
800 TEU 2011
17.3
E
1787 BALTIC SHARK
IMO 9315032
868 TEU 2004
17.4
E
1788 ATLANTIC WEST
IMO 9396610
1,350 TEU 2008
17.4
E
1789 MSC ROMINA II
IMO 9449821
1,496 TEU 2009
17.4
E
1790 JONATHAN P
IMO 9357872
1,732 TEU 2006
17.4
E
1791 UNI-PHOENIX
IMO 9202170
1,206 TEU 1998
17.5
E
1792 MSC ORTOLAN II
IMO 9401685
1,740 TEU 2009
17.5
E
1793 BALLATA
IMO 9327578
1,100 TEU 2006
17.5
E
1794 YM INVENTIVE
IMO 9319105
1,805 TEU 2007
17.5
E
1795 MSC EDITH II
IMO 9169029
1,658 TEU 1998
17.6
E
1796 ELBWATER
IMO 9504073
1,036 TEU 2012
17.6
E
1797 CONTSHIP LEX
IMO 9346562
1,100 TEU 2006
17.6
E
1798 MEDKON CANAKKALE
IMO 9341964
698 TEU 2007
17.6
E
1799 AKACIA
IMO 9315020
868 TEU 2004
17.7
E
1800 ATLANTIC EXPRESS
IMO 9330850
1,100 TEU 2007
17.7
E
Page 36 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.