Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#993 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
11.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+20% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
951 SONGA WINDS
IMO 9416109
19,954 2009
11.4
D
952 TERNFJORD
IMO 9722405
14,848 2016
11.4
D
953 THUN LIVERPOOL
IMO 9828998
18,684 2019
11.4
D
954 SUN 9
IMO 9529645
19,992 2010
11.4
D
955 CIELO DI ULSAN
IMO 9717266
39,060 2015
11.4
D
956 CONDOR TRADER
IMO 9742077
22,423 2016
11.5
D
957 CHEM STREAM
IMO 9479979
19,998 2010
11.5
D
958 ANDINO DELTA
IMO 9172210
16,028 1998
11.5
D
959 SWAN INDIAN
IMO 9724051
19,855 2015
11.5
D
960 JBU ONYX
IMO 9392999
19,864 2008
11.5
D
961 SAMC SWAN
IMO 9813058
8,707 2019
11.5
D
962 AAPUS 11
IMO 9508158
19,814 2008
11.5
D
963 STOLT INVENTION
IMO 9102100
36,733 1997
11.5
D
964 THERESA II
IMO 9871074
19,907 2020
11.5
D
965 MISTRAL EXPLORER
IMO 9624770
21,323 2012
11.6
D
966 NORMAN
IMO 9125279
10,022 1996
11.6
D
967 GINGA KITE
IMO 9228291
19,997 2001
11.6
D
968 SIGAIA THERESA
IMO 9748710
12,661 2015
11.6
D
969 EVA FUJI
IMO 9914242
19,891 2021
11.6
D
970 ADELAIDE
IMO 9597721
21,280 2011
11.6
D
971 MAC TOKYO
IMO 9343778
19,998 2006
11.6
D
972 STANLEY PARK
IMO 9363845
19,994 2008
11.7
D
973 STOLT ACHIEVEMENT
IMO 9124469
37,141 1999
11.7
D
974 KOCATEPE
IMO 9274666
37,082 2005
11.7
D
975 SCOT FLENSBURG
IMO 9365269
8,150 2008
11.7
D
976 SOLAR ALICE
IMO 9887384
24,621 2021
11.7
D
977 HAI XING
IMO 9291066
16,882 2004
11.7
D
978 DS OCEAN
IMO 9330587
19,940 2007
11.7
D
979 MAC LONDON
IMO 9296872
19,999 2003
11.7
D
980 MELATI 6
IMO 9172260
31,969 2000
11.7
D
981 NYMPH THETIS
IMO 9232369
17,427 2000
11.7
D
982 BALTIC SWIFT
IMO 9464376
37,565 2010
11.7
D
983 STELLA THERESA
IMO 9594145
12,601 2011
11.7
D
984 CONTI BENGUELA
IMO 9391373
37,652 2008
11.7
D
985 MONJASA ROVER
IMO 9271884
17,653 2004
11.8
D
986 CHEM NEW YORK
IMO 9705732
19,994 2014
11.8
D
987 GINGA LEOPARD
IMO 9425992
25,982 2008
11.8
D
988 TG GEMINI
IMO 9442562
25,594 2009
11.8
D
989 XANTHIA
IMO 9246152
17,031 2003
11.8
D
990 EVA PEARL
IMO 9985992
19,910 2024
11.8
D
991 GOLDEN RAY
IMO 9640102
19,802 2012
11.8
D
992 SWAN DIGNITY
IMO 9806706
12,661 2017
11.8
D
993 GWEN
IMO 9407067
19,702 2008
11.9
D
994 SEA BAZOU
IMO 9391141
19,998 2008
11.9
D
995 LAVRAKI
IMO 9323077
20,811 2007
11.9
D
996 SLOMAN HESTIA
IMO 9776133
16,473 2017
11.9
D
997 FURE WEST
IMO 9301873
17,349 2006
11.9
D
998 SONGA POLARIS
IMO 9457749
25,145 2011
11.9
D
999 GRIFFIN T
IMO 9390537
10,778 2008
11.9
D
1000 ERDEK
IMO 9175767
10,307 1998
11.9
D
Page 20 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.