Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,076 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-8% greener
D

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 556C 557D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 279 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
59
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
45
'27 Q4
71
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
36
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,834 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,718 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,320 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,185 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,151 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,118 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

403
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,636–3,894M
capex range, top measure per vessel (403 of 403 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 SUNNY APATITE
IMO 9721891
49,999 2016
4.6
C
1052 DIYYINAH - I
IMO 9487251
74,954 2011
4.6
C
1053 NEXT
IMO 9286023
72,515 2004
4.6
C
1054 BOTAFOGO
IMO 9395329
106,892 2010
4.6
C
1055 MINERVA LISA
IMO 9276597
103,755 2004
4.6
C
1056 TORM HELLERUP
IMO 9798002
114,951 2018
4.6
C
1057 NORD MIRAI
IMO 9890939
49,995 2021
4.6
C
1058 ADVANTAGE SUN
IMO 9513141
156,644 2012
4.6
C
1059 ADVANTAGE SUMMER
IMO 9419890
156,527 2010
4.6
C
1060 TORM INTEGRITY
IMO 9602710
73,811 2013
4.6
C
1061 TORM EMMA
IMO 9592680
75,022 2012
4.6
C
1062 NISSOS KOUFONISSI
IMO 9895214
157,447 2021
4.6
C
1063 KMARIN RIGOUR
IMO 9683049
109,475 2016
4.6
C
1064 PGC MARINA
IMO 9299563
72,807 2005
4.6
C
1065 SOLAR MADELEIN
IMO 9882413
49,990 2020
4.6
C
1066 MINERVA PISCES
IMO 9410179
105,475 2008
4.6
C
1067 STAVANGER POSEIDON
IMO 9839105
49,999 2020
4.6
C
1068 EMERALD SPIRIT
IMO 9422005
109,144 2009
4.7
C
1069 TORM TIMOTHY
IMO 9726487
49,757 2015
4.7
C
1070 LILLESAND
IMO 9336397
105,786 2007
4.7
C
1071 ECLIPSE I
IMO 9301536
158,933 2006
4.7
C
1072 SUEZ ICE SUPREME
IMO 9296418
146,356 2007
4.7
C
1073 TORM EMILIE
IMO 9592692
75,013 2013
4.7
C
1074 HAFNIA NANJING
IMO 9863235
74,999 2021
4.7
C
1075 TORM SUPREME
IMO 9797735
49,999 2015
4.7
C
1076 ZENOVIA LADY
IMO 9389277
109,999 2009
4.7
D
1077 NORDTOKYO
IMO 9859208
50,192 2020
4.7
D
1078 OLYMPIC SKY
IMO 9489297
104,768 2008
4.7
D
1079 SEASENATOR
IMO 9304368
105,715 2007
4.7
D
1080 NORVIC MONIA
IMO 9404936
105,348 2008
4.7
D
1081 AFRAPEARL II
IMO 9437672
115,897 2010
4.7
D
1082 MARE NOSTRUM
IMO 9346885
110,295 2009
4.7
D
1083 RAINBOW SPIRIT
IMO 9837171
129,734 2020
4.7
D
1084 TWERK
IMO 9379961
74,268 2008
4.7
D
1085 BAYOU SUN
IMO 9911537
49,999 2022
4.7
D
1086 AEGEAN HARMONY
IMO 9338917
115,824 2007
4.7
D
1087 JAG LAXMI
IMO 9568196
105,525 2012
4.8
D
1088 CHEMTRANS POLARIS
IMO 9308998
72,291 2005
4.8
D
1089 PS STARS
IMO 9930519
49,999 2022
4.8
D
1090 TORM EVA
IMO 9577109
74,552 2011
4.8
D
1091 MINERVA CLARA
IMO 9297333
103,231 2002
4.8
D
1092 YELLOW STARS
IMO 9913626
49,999 2021
4.8
D
1093 AFRAMAX RIVIERA
IMO 9282912
104,250 2005
4.8
D
1094 ST.NIKOLAI
IMO 9788485
50,129 2018
4.8
D
1095 ALTERA WIND
IMO 9863560
103,118 2021
4.8
D
1096 MERBABU
IMO 9388364
105,746 2008
4.8
D
1097 TP ENDURANCE
IMO 9895197
49,999 2020
4.8
D
1098 SAKURA PRINCESS
IMO 9358541
105,365 2007
4.8
D
1099 NOUNOU
IMO 9960980
115,322 2023
4.8
D
1100 CASPIAN SEA
IMO 9829095
114,218 2019
4.8
D
Page 22 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.