Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#792 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-25% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 556C 557D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 279 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
57
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
45
'27 Q4
71
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
34
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,874 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,757 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,371 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,195 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

411
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,668–3,970M
capex range, top measure per vessel (411 of 411 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.49 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
754 SKS DRIVA
IMO 9428970
119,456 2010
3.7
C
753 SEARANGER
IMO 9759800
114,055 2017
3.7
C
752 TORM GLORIA
IMO 9461843
119,456 2011
3.7
C
751 ESTRELLA
IMO 9696761
106,282 2014
3.7
C
756 RAN DF
IMO 9953470
114,575 2023
3.7
C
755 STI SELATAR
IMO 9729245
109,999 2017
3.7
C
760 PACIFIC PEARL
IMO 9893072
113,306 2021
3.7
C
759 POLAR ACE
IMO 9721504
109,999 2018
3.7
C
761 NAVIG8 PROVIDENCE
IMO 9947378
109,995 2023
3.7
C
758 OCEANUS
IMO 9337004
150,265 2008
3.7
C
757 HAFNIA EXECUTIVE
IMO 9735622
74,431 2016
3.7
C
763 DUBAI BRILLIANCE
IMO 9422550
115,617 2011
3.8
C
762 ALDEBARAN
IMO 9853400
112,802 2019
3.8
C
764 MARATHON TS
IMO 9737371
113,651 2017
3.8
C
770 ANGELONIA
IMO 9901051
111,039 2021
3.8
C
769 NEW DISCOVERY
IMO 9269075
159,199 2003
3.8
C
768 MARCILIO DIAS
IMO 9453858
157,055 2009
3.8
C
767 PACIFIC RUBY
IMO 9893034
113,306 2021
3.8
C
766 ELANDRA GULF
IMO 9749544
113,364 2016
3.8
C
765 KWK EXCELSUS
IMO 9728411
114,716 2016
3.8
C
772 KMARIN REASON
IMO 9683087
109,483 2017
3.8
C
771 HANOVER SQUARE
IMO 9783992
114,366 2019
3.8
C
774 STI LAUREN
IMO 9696711
109,999 2013
3.8
C
776 SEACHARM
IMO 9773765
112,179 2018
3.8
C
773 STI SOLACE
IMO 9708588
109,999 2016
3.8
C
775 MARAN POSEIDON
IMO 9402926
158,267 2010
3.8
C
777 KAPSALI
IMO 9587312
158,546 2011
3.8
C
779 DUBAI BEAUTY
IMO 9422548
115,382 2011
3.8
C
778 MEDITERRANEAN VOYAGER
IMO 9857858
115,165 2019
3.8
C
782 PIS RINJANI
IMO 9792864
109,900 2019
3.8
C
781 MARATHI
IMO 9772357
149,991 2014
3.8
C
783 STI STABILITY
IMO 9712840
109,999 2013
3.8
C
780 MILTON SANTOS
IMO 9453884
157,055 2017
3.8
C
784 STI CONNAUGHT
IMO 9697600
109,999 2015
3.8
C
785 SEATRIBUTE
IMO 9857468
111,932 2020
3.8
C
787 HAFNIA TAGUS
IMO 9766205
74,151 2017
3.8
C
790 STELLATA
IMO 9732230
109,991 2016
3.8
C
789 STEMNITSA
IMO 9693070
109,999 2015
3.8
C
788 ALMI HORIZON
IMO 9579494
157,787 2011
3.8
C
786 AMAZON FORTITUDE
IMO 9820544
72,836 2018
3.8
C
791 NISSOS DELOS
IMO 9592305
115,690 2012
3.8
C
792 AGRARI
IMO 9389083
107,009 2009
3.8
C
796 FRONT JAGUAR
IMO 9703332
109,900 2016
3.8
C
795 SUEZ PROTOPIA
IMO 9380893
160,391 2008
3.8
C
794 STARLING
IMO 9737527
74,033 2016
3.8
C
793 PROMETHEUS ENERGY
IMO 9801988
114,459 2019
3.8
C
800 PENELOPE
IMO 9941726
114,763 2023
3.8
C
799 MACHADO DE ASSIS
IMO 9453872
157,055 2016
3.8
C
798 SEA PUMA
IMO 9802176
114,560 2019
3.8
C
797 STI SUPREME
IMO 9719721
109,999 2016
3.8
C
Page 16 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.