Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,092 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-7% greener
D

CII band distribution

552 at D/E
A 412B 557C 554D 355E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 266 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

39
Q3
49
Q4
65
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
40
'27 Q4
48
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,872 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,753 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,191 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,157 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 858 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 776 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

386
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,607–3,828M
capex range, top measure per vessel (386 of 386 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 BOTAFOGO
IMO 9395329
106,892 2010
4.6
C
1052 NEXT
IMO 9286023
72,515 2004
4.6
C
1053 ARK
IMO 9313486
105,804 2008
4.6
C
1054 DIYYINAH - I
IMO 9487251
74,954 2011
4.6
C
1055 NORD MIRAI
IMO 9890939
49,995 2021
4.6
C
1056 TORM HELLERUP
IMO 9798002
114,951 2018
4.6
C
1057 MINERVA LISA
IMO 9276597
103,755 2004
4.6
C
1058 ADVANTAGE SUN
IMO 9513141
156,644 2012
4.6
C
1059 ADVANTAGE SUMMER
IMO 9419890
156,527 2010
4.6
C
1060 TORM INTEGRITY
IMO 9602710
73,811 2010
4.6
C
1061 TORM EMMA
IMO 9592680
75,022 2012
4.6
C
1062 AFRAMAX RIVIERA
IMO 9282912
107,113 2005
4.6
C
1063 NISSOS KOUFONISSI
IMO 9895214
157,447 2021
4.6
C
1064 PGC MARINA
IMO 9299563
72,807 2005
4.6
C
1065 KMARIN RIGOUR
IMO 9683049
109,475 2016
4.6
C
1066 STAVANGER POSEIDON
IMO 9839105
49,999 2020
4.6
C
1067 MINERVA PISCES
IMO 9410179
105,475 2008
4.6
C
1068 SOLAR MADELEIN
IMO 9882413
49,990 2020
4.6
C
1069 EMERALD SPIRIT
IMO 9422005
109,144 2009
4.7
C
1070 LILLESAND
IMO 9336397
105,786 2007
4.7
C
1071 TORM TIMOTHY
IMO 9726487
49,757 2013
4.7
C
1072 ECLIPSE I
IMO 9301536
158,933 2006
4.7
C
1073 SUEZ ICE SUPREME
IMO 9296418
146,356 2007
4.7
C
1074 TORM EMILIE
IMO 9592692
75,013 2013
4.7
C
1075 TORM SUPREME
IMO 9797735
49,999 2017
4.7
C
1076 HAFNIA NANJING
IMO 9863235
74,999 2021
4.7
C
1077 NORDTOKYO
IMO 9859208
50,192 2020
4.7
D
1078 ZENOVIA LADY
IMO 9389277
109,999 2009
4.7
D
1079 OLYMPIC SKY
IMO 9489297
104,768 2008
4.7
D
1080 NAVIG8 MONTIEL
IMO 9482861
75,571 2012
4.7
D
1081 SEASENATOR
IMO 9304368
105,715 2003
4.7
D
1082 NORVIC MONIA
IMO 9404936
105,348 2008
4.7
D
1083 AFRAPEARL II
IMO 9437672
115,897 2010
4.7
D
1084 MARE NOSTRUM
IMO 9346885
110,295 2009
4.7
D
1085 RAINBOW SPIRIT
IMO 9837171
129,734 2020
4.7
D
1086 TWERK
IMO 9379961
74,268 2008
4.7
D
1087 BAYOU SUN
IMO 9911537
49,999 2022
4.7
D
1088 AEGEAN HARMONY
IMO 9338917
115,824 2007
4.7
D
1089 CHEMTRANS POLARIS
IMO 9308998
72,291 2005
4.8
D
1090 JAG LAXMI
IMO 9568196
105,525 2012
4.8
D
1091 PS STARS
IMO 9930519
49,999 2022
4.8
D
1092 ALTERA WIND
IMO 9863560
103,118 2021
4.8
D
1093 YELLOW STARS
IMO 9913626
49,999 2021
4.8
D
1094 MINERVA CLARA
IMO 9297333
103,231 2002
4.8
D
1095 MERBABU
IMO 9388364
105,746 2008
4.8
D
1096 ST.NIKOLAI
IMO 9788485
50,129 2018
4.8
D
1097 NOUNOU
IMO 9960980
115,322 2023
4.8
D
1098 TP ENDURANCE
IMO 9895197
49,999 2020
4.8
D
1099 TORM EVA
IMO 9577109
74,213 2011
4.8
D
1100 SAKURA PRINCESS
IMO 9358541
105,365 2007
4.8
D
Page 22 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.