Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#698 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
12.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+13% higher
C

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 274 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 659 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
651 FWN SPIRIT
IMO 9735220
10,546 2017
11.8
C
652 ALASKABORG
IMO 9466374
17,294 2012
11.8
C
653 TANARO RIVER
IMO 9631929
7,600 2012
11.8
C
654 SELVAAGSUND
IMO 9956862
8,534 2023
11.8
C
655 IBRAHIM KONAN
IMO 9306328
8,107 2006
11.8
C
656 VANCOUVERBORG
IMO 9213741
9,829 2001
11.8
C
657 LADY SEMA
IMO 9233624
16,190 2001
11.8
C
658 ARUBABORG
IMO 9466295
17,407 2010
11.8
C
659 DIJKSGRACHT
IMO 9420772
17,381 2008
11.9
C
660 ORION 7
IMO 9611101
6,041 2011
11.9
C
661 ARKLOW ARROW
IMO 9851971
8,543 2021
11.9
C
662 ARKLOW ARCHER
IMO 9851969
8,543 2020
11.9
C
663 NOORDDIJK
IMO 9591820
10,953 2011
11.9
C
664 EDENBORG
IMO 9463449
11,199 2010
12.0
C
665 ERIEBORG
IMO 9463437
11,219 2009
12.0
C
666 AMERICABORG
IMO 9365659
17,356 2007
12.0
C
667 STARVIP
IMO 9326495
18,615 2007
12.0
C
668 MITIQ
IMO 9081306
12,760 1995
12.0
C
669 ARKLOW BANK
IMO 9638769
8,660 2014
12.0
C
670 LONGWOOD
IMO 9504138
11,023 2011
12.0
C
671 LAUNKALNE
IMO 9504114
11,048 2010
12.0
C
672 AZOV FORWARD
IMO 9736896
12,630 2019
12.1
C
673 HARTURA
IMO 9546447
12,223 2009
12.1
C
674 FWN SUN
IMO 9721669
10,546 2016
12.1
C
675 VIVIAN
IMO 9620358
7,636 2011
12.1
C
676 YEBA
IMO 9045728
8,049 2004
12.1
C
677 SELAM
IMO 9418286
8,300 2008
12.1
C
678 ARKLOW ABBEY
IMO 9851933
8,543 2019
12.1
C
679 ATLANTA
IMO 9513373
12,223 2009
12.1
C
680 AL LUQTA
IMO 9294953
10,584 2004
12.1
C
681 SAVA
IMO 9158082
9,752 1999
12.1
C
682 STEVIE
IMO 9488035
12,767 2010
12.2
C
683 TEVFIK BEY
IMO 9383326
8,317 2007
12.2
C
684 ARKLOW ACCORD
IMO 9851945
8,543 2020
12.2
C
685 SAIMAAGRACHT
IMO 9288069
23,741 2005
12.2
C
686 ATLANTICBORG
IMO 9466350
17,294 2012
12.2
C
687 EEMSBORG
IMO 9423748
11,287 2009
12.2
C
688 FULMAR S
IMO 9370082
13,450 2007
12.2
C
689 ARKLOW ARTIST
IMO 9851983
8,543 2021
12.3
C
690 TRANSOSPREY
IMO 9213090
20,396 2003
12.3
C
691 CHELSEA-2
IMO 9314442
5,457 2005
12.3
C
692 VICTORIABORG
IMO 9234276
9,826 2001
12.3
C
693 CELESTIA
IMO 9258997
10,326 2002
12.3
C
694 CELIK 1
IMO 9430791
7,702 2007
12.3
C
695 ESL AUSTRALIA
IMO 9365661
17,356 2007
12.3
C
696 WHITE STAR
IMO 9381938
9,223 2007
12.3
C
697 AQUIS PERLA
IMO 9161869
10,132 1997
12.4
C
698 AZOV CONCORD
IMO 9387748
10,173 2008
12.4
C
699 DENIZ AKAY
IMO 9349447
10,501 2010
12.4
C
700 FIONA
IMO 9381419
8,109 2009
12.4
C
Page 14 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.