Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,756 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
13.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+37% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1751 ANNABA
IMO 9306201
1,578 TEU 2006
13.8
E
1752 MSC NORDEROOG F
IMO 9256315
1,402 TEU 2004
13.8
E
1753 JOANNA BORCHARD
IMO 1016563
17,495 2025
13.8
E
1754 LASALLE
IMO 9349368
2,450 TEU 2006
13.8
E
1755 NEWYORKER
IMO 9209104
2,506 TEU 2001
13.8
E
1756 KAWA BUDAPEST
IMO 9379571
1,060 TEU 2006
13.8
E
1757 MERATUS JAYAKARTA
IMO 9305879
2,474 TEU 2005
13.9
E
1758 MSC LEANDRA V
IMO 9313943
4,196 TEU 2007
13.9
E
1759 NORTH
IMO 9491501
1,436 TEU 2011
13.9
E
1760 SC MEDFORD
IMO 9275103
1,200 TEU 2004
13.9
E
1761 SLS AZURE
IMO 9155377
1,740 TEU 2000
13.9
E
1762 MSC TAMISHKA F
IMO 9358905
1,304 TEU 2007
13.9
E
1763 MSC AUBE F
IMO 9360283
1,060 TEU 2005
13.9
E
1764 TUKUMA ARCTICA
IMO 9822865
2,150 TEU 2020
13.9
E
1765 NORDIC ISTRIA
IMO 9474383
1,085 TEU 2011
13.9
E
1766 MSC BAHRAIN II
IMO 9359301
1,440 TEU 2006
13.9
E
1767 MARLA BULL
IMO 9932945
1,900 TEU 2015
14.0
E
1768 MARSA PRIDE
IMO 9301445
2,556 TEU 2005
14.0
E
1769 AS SABRINA
IMO 9387463
1,713 TEU 2009
14.0
E
1770 MSC SUEDEROOG F
IMO 9256327
1,402 TEU 2005
14.0
E
1771 MSC AMY
IMO 9242651
1,683 TEU 2002
14.0
E
1772 JEAN PIERRE A
IMO 9379351
1,604 TEU 2007
14.0
E
1773 ELBINSEL
IMO 9977426
20,128 2024
14.0
E
1774 EF EMMA
IMO 9357808
1,706 TEU 2008
14.1
E
1775 MARTI SPIRIT
IMO 9477347
1,338 TEU 2010
14.1
E
1776 FREDERIK
IMO 9328637
1,200 TEU 2005
14.1
E
1777 CIELO DI RABAT
IMO 9141792
2,061 TEU 1997
14.1
E
1778 VENTO DI MELTEMI
IMO 9242297
1,221 TEU 2002
14.1
E
1779 ELBELLA
IMO 9312640
1,740 TEU 2006
14.1
E
1780 NEVZAT KALKAVAN
IMO 9365867
1,849 TEU 2005
14.1
E
1781 MSC TIANA F
IMO 9108398
1,129 TEU 1996
14.2
E
1782 ERASMUS GOAL
IMO 9626558
1,805 TEU 2013
14.2
E
1783 MSC KUWAIT III
IMO 9226413
2,526 TEU 2001
14.2
E
1784 NEPTUNE MATUA
IMO 9670119
2,190 TEU 2015
14.2
E
1785 PORTSMOUTH
IMO 9302437
2,478 TEU 2004
14.2
E
1786 UAFL RACER
IMO 9334818
1,740 TEU 2007
14.2
E
1787 DOUCE FRANCE
IMO 9845661
2,296 TEU 2020
14.3
E
1788 APL SAIPAN
IMO 9239850
1,641 TEU 2002
14.3
E
1789 CHIQUITA MERCHANT
IMO 9344631
1,819 TEU 2007
14.3
E
1790 ESPERANCE
IMO 9491484
1,436 TEU 2011
14.3
E
1791 RAQUEL S
IMO 9515591
1,577 TEU 2009
14.3
E
1792 VALENCIA EXPRESS
IMO 9108130
2,268 TEU 1996
14.3
E
1793 DJANET
IMO 9845063
1,500 TEU 2020
14.3
E
1794 MARINA L
IMO 9431331
1,368 TEU 2009
14.3
E
1795 TRADEWIND
IMO 9367944
907 TEU 2007
14.3
E
1796 CMA CGM FORT ST PIERRE
IMO 9261891
2,260 TEU 2003
14.4
E
1797 ALEXANDER B
IMO 9328649
1,223 TEU 2006
14.4
E
1798 CIRTA
IMO 9845051
1,500 TEU 2020
14.4
E
1799 MEDKON RIZE
IMO 9114347
652 TEU 1996
14.5
E
1800 AS PENELOPE
IMO 9294537
2,572 TEU 2005
14.5
E
Page 36 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.