Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,628 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
11.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
+20% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1601 GH FOEHN
IMO 9377559
2,700 TEU 2008
11.8
D
1602 MSC SANDY III
IMO 9239733
2,462 TEU 2002
11.8
D
1603 MUSTAFA DAYI
IMO 9365855
1,849 TEU 2011
11.8
D
1604 MAERSK VALPARAISO
IMO 9433054
1,740 TEU 2010
11.8
D
1605 VALENTINA
IMO 9344722
1,875 TEU 2007
11.8
D
1606 SANTA MARTA EXPRESS
IMO 9446104
2,550 TEU 2010
11.8
D
1607 CMA CGM AFRICA TWO
IMO 9451927
3,600 TEU 2010
11.8
D
1608 SAN ALFONSO
IMO 9344667
1,819 TEU 2007
11.9
D
1609 ODYSSEUS
IMO 9315824
2,824 TEU 2006
11.9
D
1610 MAERSK NANSHA
IMO 9385996
2,546 TEU 2008
11.9
D
1611 MSC LEA II
IMO 9162643
1,733 TEU 2000
11.9
D
1612 CAPE BYRON
IMO 9950090
1,900 TEU 2023
11.9
D
1613 LION
IMO 9208356
1,716 TEU 2000
11.9
D
1614 NEXOE MAERSK
IMO 9220885
2,226 TEU 2001
11.9
D
1615 MIEKE SCHULTE
IMO 9694426
2,339 TEU 2015
11.9
D
1616 MAERSK NILE
IMO 9385972
2,546 TEU 2008
11.9
D
1617 GREEN HOPE
IMO 9629160
1,700 TEU 2014
12.0
D
1618 MARIO A
IMO 9337377
1,604 TEU 2007
12.0
D
1619 KOTA NABIL
IMO 9356830
1,810 TEU 2008
12.0
D
1620 SINAR BUKITTINGGI
IMO 9942299
1,528 TEU 2023
12.0
D
1621 CAUCEDO EXPRESS
IMO 9434931
2,550 TEU 2009
12.0
D
1622 TORONTO EXPRESS
IMO 9253727
4,402 TEU 2003
12.0
D
1623 MSC RHIANNON
IMO 9224051
2,024 TEU 2001
12.0
D
1624 MARGARETE SCHULTE
IMO 9302944
2,602 TEU 2006
12.0
D
1625 ITAL WAY
IMO 9950789
2,300 TEU 2024
12.0
D
1626 CMA CGM ORANGE
IMO 9690092
2,259 TEU 2016
12.0
D
1627 MACAO
IMO 9362724
1,795 TEU 2008
12.0
D
1628 CRISTINA A
IMO 9337365
1,604 TEU 2007
12.1
D
1629 MSC YOSHEEN
IMO 9322011
1,730 TEU 2008
12.1
D
1630 RACHEL BORCHARD
IMO 1016587
17,484 2025
12.1
D
1631 JPO AQUARIUS
IMO 9220316
2,470 TEU 2000
12.1
D
1632 MSC JANIS 3
IMO 9134490
2,086 TEU 1997
12.1
D
1633 MSC ARAINA III
IMO 9345984
3,534 TEU 2008
12.1
D
1634 CMA CGM AFRICA ONE
IMO 9451915
3,600 TEU 2010
12.1
D
1635 MAERSK WAKAYAMA
IMO 9550357
1,577 TEU 2010
12.1
D
1636 SAGAMORE
IMO 9322009
1,730 TEU 2008
12.1
D
1637 CONTAINERSHIPS POLAR
IMO 9814002
1,368 TEU 2019
12.1
D
1638 MSC CLAUDIA
IMO 9113446
1,205 TEU 1996
12.1
D
1639 RIYADH MUKAAB
IMO 9399806
2,750 TEU 2010
12.2
D
1640 MSC SINES R
IMO 9210098
3,430 TEU 2001
12.2
D
1641 VIOLETTA
IMO 9344710
1,875 TEU 2007
12.2
D
1642 ECO PONENTE
IMO 9985966
13,661 2024
12.2
D
1643 MSC WIND II
IMO 9173135
2,169 TEU 1999
12.2
D
1644 NCL VESTLAND
IMO 9981790
1,300 TEU 2025
12.3
D
1645 CMA CGM AGATHA
IMO 9763722
2,338 TEU 2016
12.3
D
1646 LUCIE SCHULTE
IMO 9301926
2,602 TEU 2006
12.3
D
1647 AS CLAUDIA
IMO 9330549
2,824 TEU 2007
12.3
D
1648 PANDA 005
IMO 9981063
1,400 TEU 2022
12.3
D
1649 VALDIVIA
IMO 9333395
1,678 TEU 2006
12.3
D
1650 AS CARELIA
IMO 9309409
2,824 TEU 2006
12.3
D
Page 33 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.