Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,303 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
16.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+80% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1301 BASARAN BAYRAK
IMO 9932165
8,127 2022
16.9
E
1302 WAVEPOWER
IMO 1043097
8,524 2025
16.9
E
1303 OWL 6
IMO 9340350
13,006 2007
16.9
E
1304 VIOLETA THERESA
IMO 9354571
8,817 2006
16.9
E
1305 MUT OZT
IMO 9382114
7,915 2007
16.9
E
1306 MRC LINA
IMO 9462299
8,280 2009
17.0
E
1307 ATA OCEAN
IMO 9373929
9,942 2007
17.0
E
1308 PECHORA STAR
IMO 9488322
13,021 2011
17.1
E
1309 SELENKA
IMO 9447067
10,745 2009
17.1
E
1310 CYAN ORCA
IMO 9542908
9,131 2007
17.2
E
1311 LISA ESSBERGER
IMO 9295438
8,617 2005
17.2
E
1312 HULIN
IMO 9447043
10,745 2008
17.2
E
1313 ALICE THERESA
IMO 9478303
7,874 2010
17.2
E
1314 W WEST
IMO 9383651
8,026 2008
17.2
E
1315 LIESEL ESSBERGER
IMO 9272761
8,571 2004
17.2
E
1316 RITA IEVOLI
IMO 9846471
15,882 2023
17.3
E
1317 EVA HONGKONG
IMO 9800001
19,861 2017
17.3
E
1318 SCOT BREMEN
IMO 9260835
8,211 2003
17.3
E
1319 DONIA
IMO 9442914
7,701 2008
17.4
E
1320 MONA SWAN
IMO 9371804
11,348 2006
17.4
E
1321 MERCURIUS
IMO 9816531
7,998 2019
17.4
E
1322 CHARLOTTE THERESA
IMO 9400708
11,403 2008
17.4
E
1323 JETTE THERESA
IMO 9406582
11,383 2009
17.4
E
1324 BISCAY
IMO 9474450
11,161 2008
17.5
E
1325 SCOT HAMBURG
IMO 9255799
8,241 2002
17.5
E
1326 SCOT BERLIN
IMO 9255804
8,254 2003
17.5
E
1327 TARNBRIS
IMO 9372652
11,288 2007
17.6
E
1328 SONGA RUBY
IMO 9444479
17,604 2008
17.6
E
1329 XT HONESTY
IMO 9576832
18,188 2008
17.6
E
1330 KATTEGAT
IMO 9432866
11,299 2008
17.6
E
1331 SCOT STUTTGART
IMO 9274549
8,184 2006
17.7
E
1332 GRIFFIN T
IMO 9390537
10,778 2008
17.8
E
1333 SATURNUS
IMO 9816529
7,998 2018
17.8
E
1334 SHANNON STAR
IMO 9503926
13,023 2010
17.8
E
1335 CAROLINE THERESA
IMO 9428449
7,884 2009
17.8
E
1336 BOSNIA
IMO 9445643
13,211 2008
17.8
E
1337 SLOMAN HERMES
IMO 9466738
16,418 2012
17.8
E
1338 ODOARDO AMORETTI
IMO 9361031
15,000 2011
17.9
E
1339 DUZGIT DIGNITY
IMO 9581019
8,488 2014
17.9
E
1340 KARINA THERESA
IMO 9428451
7,871 2009
17.9
E
1341 MILANO
IMO 9286059
37,305 2005
17.9
E
1342 NQ VICTORIA
IMO 9344174
8,824 2006
17.9
E
1343 DOMENICO IEVOLI
IMO 9334430
10,015 2006
18.0
E
1344 ELLEN ESSBERGER
IMO 9272747
8,571 2004
18.0
E
1345 SONGA AURORA
IMO 9373632
16,651 2008
18.1
E
1346 TERNVIND
IMO 9425356
11,258 2008
18.1
E
1347 NORDIC
IMO 9438444
11,530 2008
18.2
E
1348 PLEVNE
IMO 9340908
11,321 2007
18.2
E
1349 CARIBE LUNA
IMO 9352133
13,157 2006
18.3
E
1350 AYSEN STAR
IMO 9419199
12,552 2010
18.3
E
Page 27 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.