Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#171 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-45% greener
A

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 448C 447D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 224 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q4
53
'27 Q1
41
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
43
'27 Q4
39
'28 Q1
34
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,297 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,286 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,133 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,133 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 930 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 700 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

284
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€694–1,710M
capex range, top measure per vessel (284 of 284 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
153 YASA ALBATROSS
IMO 9857212
50,215 2019
5.4
A
152 SILVER ELEANOR
IMO 9692301
49,746 2015
5.4
A
154 ARDMORE SEAVANGUARD
IMO 9637088
51,800 2010
5.4
A
151 DEE4 LARCH
IMO 9697909
49,737 2016
5.4
A
156 TORM DENISE
IMO 9702211
49,999 2013
5.4
A
155 STENA IMPERATOR
IMO 9797383
49,690 2017
5.4
A
157 SEAWAYS FRONTIER
IMO 9332303
49,999 2007
5.4
A
158 OPTIMUS
IMO 9835044
49,999 2019
5.4
A
159 GULF MUTTRAH
IMO 9381835
46,556 2009
5.4
A
161 NORD HARMONY
IMO 9870719
50,494 2020
5.5
A
160 AL AMERAT
IMO 9405851
51,022 2008
5.5
A
163 HIGH LOYALTY
IMO 9681857
49,990 2015
5.5
A
162 STI BROOKLYN
IMO 9706841
49,990 2015
5.5
A
165 DANK SILVER
IMO 9718806
49,734 2016
5.5
A
164 SOLAR LAI FONG
IMO 9907809
49,357 2021
5.5
A
166 PTI NILE
IMO 9747338
49,999 2014
5.5
A
167 FATIMAH
IMO 9917830
55,202 2022
5.5
A
168 TORM DEBORAH
IMO 9683386
49,680 2015
5.5
A
170 VELOS LEO
IMO 9381768
49,999 2008
5.5
A
169 ECO YOSEMITE PARK
IMO 9877573
49,999 2020
5.5
A
172 TORM DULCE
IMO 9682394
49,746 2014
5.5
A
171 ELKA ELEFSIS
IMO 9705914
51,000 2015
5.5
A
174 NAVIG8 GOAL
IMO 9853216
49,770 2019
5.5
A
173 LARGO EVOLUTION
IMO 9687942
49,750 2015
5.5
A
175 STENA IMPECCABLE
IMO 9693020
49,737 2017
5.5
A
176 ARDMORE SEAHAWK
IMO 9708239
49,999 2015
5.5
A
177 BASSET
IMO 9858060
49,875 2019
5.5
A
178 ZANDOLIE
IMO 9893163
50,494 2021
5.5
A
180 DRACO
IMO 9801562
50,067 2021
5.5
A
179 ECO LOS ANGELES
IMO 9877559
50,185 2020
5.5
A
181 ECO JOSHUA PARK
IMO 9877585
49,999 2020
5.5
A
183 YASA SWAN
IMO 9857248
50,215 2019
5.5
A
182 CHASE OCEAN
IMO 9290660
46,959 2006
5.5
A
187 SEA LA BELLE
IMO 9380374
49,995 2008
5.6
A
186 ST HELEN
IMO 9934151
50,226 2022
5.6
A
185 YASA PELICAN
IMO 9857224
50,215 2019
5.6
A
184 SEAPROMISE
IMO 9934125
50,394 2022
5.6
A
188 PYXIS THETA
IMO 9657064
51,462 2013
5.6
A
191 SOLAR RUO YUN
IMO 9907811
49,362 2021
5.6
A
190 YASA HAWK
IMO 9619531
49,990 2017
5.6
A
189 NORD ELEGANCE
IMO 9870707
50,415 2020
5.6
A
193 SEAWAYS GRACE
IMO 9337511
49,999 2008
5.6
A
192 HAFNIA TOURMALINE
IMO 9753698
49,513 2016
5.6
A
194 STI MIRACLE
IMO 9833591
49,999 2020
5.6
A
196 CHEMROAD SIRIUS
IMO 9757979
35,757 2018
5.6
A
197 AINAZI
IMO 9323405
52,606 2008
5.6
A
195 ATLANTIC MARBLE
IMO 9798959
49,999 2018
5.6
A
200 RIVIERA
IMO 9384019
51,218 2008
5.7
A
199 STI MARSHALL
IMO 9833565
49,999 2019
5.7
A
198 NAVIG8 EXCELLENCE
IMO 9976886
49,160 2024
5.7
A
Page 4 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.