Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,932 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
17.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+76% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1901 BAKKAFOSS
IMO 9429194
1,025 TEU 2009
17.9
E
1902 WEC JAN STEEN
IMO 9354416
868 TEU 2007
17.9
E
1903 MSC CHARLOTTE
IMO 9330238
1,092 TEU 2007
18.0
E
1904 CACHALOT
IMO 9212022
1,216 TEU 2000
18.0
E
1905 HANNA
IMO 9376048
868 TEU 2008
18.0
E
1906 AKACIA
IMO 9315020
1,008 TEU 2005
18.1
E
1907 MEDKON MERSIN
IMO 9430040
232 TEU 2008
18.1
E
1908 NETA A.
IMO 9412531
1,025 TEU 2011
18.1
E
1909 WES GESA
IMO 9504061
1,000 TEU 2012
18.1
E
1910 CAPE FULMAR
IMO 9359313
1,440 TEU 2007
18.2
E
1911 SKALAR
IMO 9458975
1,000 TEU 2012
18.2
E
1912 SAMSKIP AMINA
IMO 9448683
1,085 TEU 2011
18.3
E
1913 PAN GG
IMO 9236286
1,155 TEU 2002
18.4
E
1914 ELBWATER
IMO 9504073
1,000 TEU 2012
18.4
E
1915 MSC EDITH II
IMO 9169029
1,388 TEU 1998
18.4
E
1916 HENNEKE RAMBOW
IMO 9354430
868 TEU 2007
18.5
E
1917 CMA CGM EAST
IMO 9396622
1,338 TEU 2008
18.5
E
1918 MED DENIZLI
IMO 9106493
1,055 TEU 1996
18.5
E
1919 ELBSAILOR
IMO 9448695
1,085 TEU 2012
18.6
E
1920 MED CERKEZKOY
IMO 9147215
1,076 TEU 1998
18.6
E
1921 CONTSHIP ERA
IMO 9507702
1,100 TEU 2009
18.6
E
1922 MED URLA
IMO 9160920
847 TEU 1997
18.6
E
1923 MEDKON MAX
IMO 9347786
890 TEU 2006
18.6
E
1924 MAYFIELD
IMO 9216353
1,216 TEU 2001
18.7
E
1925 CONTSHIP JET
IMO 9348625
1,267 TEU 2007
18.7
E
1926 HELMUT
IMO 9354466
868 TEU 2006
18.7
E
1927 MSC LEVANTE F
IMO 9330264
1,114 TEU 2006
18.7
E
1928 CONTSHIP ECO
IMO 9492751
700 TEU 2008
18.8
E
1929 LYNN
IMO 9295531
869 TEU 2007
18.8
E
1930 HANSA MUNKSUND
IMO 9429223
1,025 TEU 2012
18.8
E
1931 BARBARA P
IMO 9144720
942 TEU 1997
18.8
E
1932 BALTIC WHALE
IMO 9354454
868 TEU 2006
18.9
E
1933 NOVA
IMO 9250098
966 TEU 2002
18.9
E
1934 WEC DE HOOGH
IMO 9315018
1,008 TEU 2005
19.0
E
1935 IDA RAMBOW
IMO 9354478
1,008 TEU 2007
19.0
E
1936 MEDKON CANAKKALE
IMO 9341964
698 TEU 2007
19.0
E
1937 ELBRUNNER
IMO 9395563
974 TEU 2009
19.0
E
1938 CHARLOTTA
IMO 9429209
877 TEU 2009
19.1
E
1939 ELBWAVE
IMO 9504035
1,000 TEU 2011
19.1
E
1940 JONA SOPHIE
IMO 9144718
942 TEU 1997
19.1
E
1941 BALLATA
IMO 9327578
1,118 TEU 2006
19.1
E
1942 MITO
IMO 9319571
1,118 TEU 2006
19.1
E
1943 GFS LYSA
IMO 9368730
1,338 TEU 2007
19.1
E
1944 ATLANTIC EXPRESS
IMO 9330850
1,114 TEU 2007
19.1
E
1945 MAUREN
IMO 9306251
1,118 TEU 2005
19.2
E
1946 WEC VAN RIJN
IMO 9315006
1,008 TEU 2005
19.2
E
1947 PHOENIX J
IMO 9504047
1,036 TEU 2010
19.3
E
1948 MSC AZURIT F
IMO 9403437
1,118 TEU 2008
19.3
E
1949 MSC ABIGAIL F
IMO 9330226
1,102 TEU 2006
19.3
E
1950 ISABELLA B
IMO 9483358
1,036 TEU 2012
19.3
E
Page 39 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.