Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#892 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
10.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+9% higher
D

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
851 GLEN COVE
IMO 9414228
25,615 2008
10.4
D
852 PVT AZURA
IMO 9423683
19,937 2009
10.4
D
853 SEYCHELLES PROGRESS
IMO 9298181
37,558 2005
10.4
D
854 FAIRCHEM CONQUEST
IMO 9798648
21,176 2017
10.4
D
855 MARIA M
IMO 9301885
34,999 2006
10.4
D
856 ACADIA PARK
IMO 9780548
19,996 2018
10.4
D
857 GAIA DESGAGNES
IMO 9739800
17,999 2018
10.4
D
858 OPEC VICTORY
IMO 9499486
19,992 2012
10.4
D
859 OCTONAUT
IMO 9340477
19,983 2007
10.4
D
860 NISEKO GALAXY
IMO 9804930
25,183 2020
10.5
D
861 CHEMSTAR SAPPHIRE
IMO 9804904
19,993 2019
10.5
D
862 SEAVICTORY
IMO 9315783
46,700 2007
10.5
D
863 CHEMICAL ENTERPRISE
IMO 9827475
15,945 2018
10.5
D
864 SOLAR NAAMA
IMO 9887396
24,621 2021
10.5
D
865 MARIE C
IMO 9749348
25,161 2014
10.5
D
866 MTM SINGAPORE
IMO 9477529
19,996 2011
10.5
D
867 ORIENTAL GERBERA
IMO 9924716
16,279 2022
10.5
D
868 MAGIC WAND
IMO 9379143
46,754 2008
10.5
D
869 OGINO PARK
IMO 9725873
19,992 2017
10.5
D
870 SWAN ATLANTIC
IMO 9790464
19,998 2017
10.5
D
871 THUN LIDKOPING
IMO 9828974
18,684 2019
10.6
D
872 ORIENTAL SAKURA
IMO 9743746
16,090 2015
10.6
D
873 BOW VICTORY
IMO 9773179
21,193 2016
10.6
D
874 HALTI
IMO 9818278
17,993 2019
10.6
D
875 CHEM SPICA
IMO 9739264
25,268 2017
10.6
D
876 SONGA EAGLE
IMO 9388704
25,421 2008
10.6
D
877 GINGA LYNX
IMO 9442550
25,900 2009
10.6
D
878 MTM NORTH SOUND
IMO 9360946
19,874 2006
10.7
D
879 CHEM SIRIUS
IMO 9558397
19,986 2011
10.7
D
880 FAIRCHEM FALCON
IMO 9799642
19,952 2018
10.7
D
881 MOUNT KIBO
IMO 9470997
37,843 2010
10.7
D
882 ORIENTAL DAPHNE
IMO 9882736
16,267 2020
10.7
D
883 MEIZAN
IMO 9881940
19,913 2023
10.7
D
884 TERN ISLAND
IMO 9909649
15,024 2021
10.7
D
885 HYDE PARK
IMO 9725861
19,994 2017
10.7
D
886 FINNSTRAUM
IMO 9172222
16,028 1999
10.8
D
887 ALDEN
IMO 9733363
19,997 2016
10.8
D
888 ORLANDO
IMO 9420851
38,334 2009
10.8
D
889 CITY ISLAND
IMO 9360960
19,996 2007
10.8
D
890 MELDERSKIN
IMO 9737577
19,999 2014
10.8
D
891 STOLT QUETZAL
IMO 9376660
12,564 2009
10.8
D
892 CLEAN IMPERIAL
IMO 9376854
39,998 2009
10.8
D
893 TG ARIES
IMO 9485849
19,956 2012
10.9
D
894 OLYMPIC SPIRIT
IMO 9327097
24,035 2005
10.9
D
895 NORDIC MARITA
IMO 9558402
19,909 2012
10.9
D
896 SERENE MONACO
IMO 9309629
19,999 2005
10.9
D
897 ALICE
IMO 9323792
37,320 2007
10.9
D
898 DAMIANIA
IMO 9308235
20,768 2006
10.9
D
899 BALTIC SAPPHIRE
IMO 9443425
37,593 2009
10.9
D
900 ICHESIA M
IMO 9436678
40,429 2009
10.9
D
Page 18 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.