Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#310 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-38% greener
B

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 218 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q4
53
'27 Q1
41
'27 Q2
31
'27 Q3
43
'27 Q4
39
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
29
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,273 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,248 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,089 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,089 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 916 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,599M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
300 ARDMORE ENCOUNTER
IMO 9654579
49,377 2014
5.8
B
302 STENA IMPERIAL
IMO 9667485
49,750 2015
5.8
B
305 HAFNIA AXINITE
IMO 9719771
38,506 2013
5.8
B
304 TORM ALEXANDRA
IMO 9466001
49,999 2010
5.8
B
303 MTM BIG APPLE
IMO 9774563
35,957 2018
5.8
B
306 SV WAKILI
IMO 9590711
51,441 2012
5.8
B
307 SEAWAYS MADELEINE
IMO 9380518
49,999 2008
5.8
B
309 CL PEARL BUCK
IMO 9943334
49,315 2023
5.8
B
308 ARDMORE PURPOSE
IMO 9859208
50,192 2020
5.8
B
310 GALLOP
IMO 9799678
37,250 2019
5.8
B
311 TORM LAURA
IMO 9375616
49,999 2008
5.8
B
312 TORM DUBAI
IMO 9681390
49,990 2012
5.8
B
314 MIA GRACE
IMO 9681132
49,990 2012
5.8
B
313 CHAMPION ISTRA
IMO 9489209
51,655 2012
5.8
B
316 PANTERA
IMO 9301914
49,999 2007
5.8
B
315 PEACE ONE
IMO 9428334
49,867 2009
5.8
B
317 ARDMORE SEAVANTAGE
IMO 9637076
47,790 2014
5.8
B
318 CHEMROAD KAIA
IMO 1037684
35,769 2025
5.8
B
319 BRAVE OCEAN
IMO 9359363
46,105 2010
5.9
B
320 TP ENDEAVOUR
IMO 9835056
49,999 2020
5.9
B
322 DEGU
IMO 9985849
49,999 2025
5.9
B
321 HAFNIA ARONALDO
IMO 9711561
38,506 2015
5.9
B
323 OCEAN PRINCESS I
IMO 9391517
50,549 2008
5.9
B
325 PACIFIC BLUE
IMO 9867798
49,995 2020
5.9
B
324 JAL KAILASH
IMO 1013999
50,658 2025
5.9
B
326 FATIMAH
IMO 9917830
55,202 2022
5.9
B
327 SEAWAYS MIRAGE
IMO 9387138
51,476 2009
5.9
B
330 WECO MADELEINE
IMO 9693824
49,708 2016
5.9
B
329 THERESA DUA
IMO 9919723
49,449 2023
5.9
B
328 CABO NEGRO II
IMO 9317248
47,236 2006
5.9
B
331 GREAT WHITE
IMO 9392793
50,004 2009
5.9
B
332 NORD MARVEL
IMO 9877561
50,185 2020
5.9
B
333 VESTA
IMO 9629938
49,990 2011
5.9
B
334 CHAMPION CONTEST
IMO 9272199
47,171 2005
6.0
B
335 CHASE OCEAN
IMO 9290660
46,959 2006
6.0
B
336 CHEMROAD SIRIUS
IMO 9757979
35,757 2018
6.0
B
339 IONIAN FIGHTER
IMO 9422225
46,639 2010
6.0
B
338 AINAZI
IMO 9323405
52,606 2008
6.0
B
337 CS ZHE JIANG
IMO 9899478
47,497 2022
6.0
B
340 HAFNIA TANZANITE
IMO 9753703
49,478 2014
6.0
B
341 TORM ALLEGRO
IMO 9484912
46,184 2012
6.0
B
342 TORM LILLY
IMO 9392470
53,116 2009
6.0
B
343 JOSE PROGRESS
IMO 9392391
47,018 2009
6.0
B
345 ETERNITY
IMO 1045693
50,313 2025
6.0
B
344 STENA IMAGE
IMO 9667473
49,719 2015
6.0
B
346 TORM AUSTRALIA
IMO 9443140
49,999 2011
6.0
B
348 HAFNIA ANDESINE
IMO 9711559
38,506 2015
6.0
B
347 LUCKY SAILOR
IMO 9464352
37,596 2009
6.0
B
350 CARTAGENA
IMO 9389318
46,923 2009
6.0
B
349 MOSTAR
IMO 9313474
51,218 2007
6.0
B
Page 7 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.