Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,340 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
9.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-5% greener
D

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1301 VAGA MAERSK
IMO 9778545
3,700 TEU 2019
9.2
C
1302 X-PRESS SALWEEN
IMO 9862748
1,800 TEU 2021
9.2
C
1303 CMA CGM FRANCOISE SAGAN
IMO 9356696
6,661 TEU 2008
9.2
C
1304 STANLEY A
IMO 9303807
2,824 TEU 2003
9.2
D
1305 MAERSK OHIO
IMO 9298698
4,300 TEU 2006
9.2
D
1306 MSC CARPATHIA III
IMO 9253038
2,824 TEU 2003
9.2
D
1307 SEATRADE COLOMBIA
IMO 9976238
1,747 TEU 2025
9.2
D
1308 PORTO KAGIO
IMO 9261451
4,492 TEU 2002
9.2
D
1309 VUOKSI MAERSK
IMO 9775775
3,700 TEU 2018
9.2
D
1310 MED TRABZON
IMO 9141780
2,052 TEU 1997
9.2
D
1311 CMA CGM SINTRA
IMO 9961362
2,000 TEU 2024
9.3
D
1312 CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
IMO 9299795
8,488 TEU 2006
9.3
D
1313 HYUNDAI SINGAPORE
IMO 9305685
6,763 TEU 2006
9.3
D
1314 PAOLO
IMO 9389681
4,253 TEU 2008
9.3
D
1315 SEATTLE C
IMO 9360910
4,253 TEU 2007
9.3
D
1316 SC MONTREUX
IMO 9295414
4,132 TEU 2005
9.3
D
1317 CMA CGM GUARANI
IMO 9234135
2,478 TEU 2002
9.3
D
1318 OOCL KOBE
IMO 9329526
4,506 TEU 2004
9.3
D
1319 GSL MYNY
IMO 9213583
5,762 TEU 2000
9.3
D
1320 MSC MADRID
IMO 9480198
5,550 TEU 2011
9.3
D
1321 CAPE SKAGEN
IMO 9969857
2,713 TEU 2023
9.4
D
1322 CMA CGM MONTREAL
IMO 9363417
2,401 TEU 2007
9.4
D
1323 MSC HIMANSHI
IMO 9127540
2,072 TEU 1997
9.4
D
1324 SHEKOU STAR
IMO 9322322
4,250 TEU 2007
9.4
D
1325 LEDA MAERSK
IMO 9190755
4,045 TEU 2001
9.4
D
1326 GABRIEL A
IMO 9300659
1,676 TEU 2004
9.4
D
1327 MAERSK MONTANA
IMO 9305312
4,300 TEU 2006
9.4
D
1328 MSC CAPRI
IMO 9154220
2,460 TEU 1998
9.4
D
1329 PANDA 001
IMO 9290787
5,527 TEU 2005
9.4
D
1330 REMAH
IMO 9947720
1,692 TEU 2022
9.4
D
1331 MSC JANIS 3
IMO 9134490
2,100 TEU 1997
9.4
D
1332 MSC MARIA PIA
IMO 9155107
2,808 TEU 1997
9.4
D
1333 CMA CGM TOPAZ
IMO 9397602
4,300 TEU 2009
9.4
D
1334 KINGSTON
IMO 9389693
4,253 TEU 2008
9.4
D
1335 CMA CGM SPIRIT
IMO 9372860
3,426 TEU 2008
9.4
D
1336 ZIM VIRGINIA
IMO 9231808
4,800 TEU 2001
9.4
D
1337 MSC BREMEN
IMO 9369734
5,029 TEU 2007
9.4
D
1338 CAPE SABLE
IMO 9950131
2,700 TEU 2024
9.4
D
1339 CALI
IMO 9631101
3,600 TEU 2011
9.4
D
1340 MSC DYMPHNA
IMO 9110391
5,711 TEU 1996
9.4
D
1341 LEXA MAERSK
IMO 9190767
3,700 TEU 2001
9.5
D
1342 STADT DRESDEN
IMO 9320049
2,700 TEU 2004
9.5
D
1343 MSC ELIZABETH III
IMO 9215892
2,556 TEU 2001
9.5
D
1344 CAPE CITIUS
IMO 9848742
2,708 TEU 2021
9.5
D
1345 MSC RADIANT III
IMO 9235402
2,452 TEU 2001
9.5
D
1346 JOLLY GIADA
IMO 9484522
4,400 TEU 2010
9.5
D
1347 MSC CORUNA
IMO 9480215
5,550 TEU 2011
9.5
D
1348 MSC KIM
IMO 9351581
4,254 TEU 2008
9.5
D
1349 MSC MONTEREY V
IMO 9349796
4,860 TEU 2007
9.5
D
1350 MAERSK PUELO
IMO 9306172
6,539 TEU 2006
9.5
D
Page 27 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.