Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,988 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
19.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+93% higher
E
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1951 WEC VAN GOGH
IMO 9246566
880 TEU 2004
18.2
E
1952 CAPE FULMAR
IMO 9359313
1,440 TEU 2007
18.2
E
1953 SAMSKIP AMINA
IMO 9448683
1,085 TEU 2011
18.3
E
1954 GRANDE GABON
IMO 9437933
800 TEU 2011
18.3
E
1955 MSC CHARLOTTE
IMO 9330238
1,100 TEU 2007
18.3
E
1956 PAN GG
IMO 9236286
1,155 TEU 2002
18.4
E
1957 MSC EDITH II
IMO 9169029
1,658 TEU 1998
18.4
E
1958 WES GESA
IMO 9504061
1,036 TEU 2012
18.4
E
1959 HENNEKE RAMBOW
IMO 9354430
868 TEU 2007
18.5
E
1960 CMA CGM EAST
IMO 9396622
1,350 TEU 2008
18.5
E
1961 SKALAR
IMO 9458975
1,036 TEU 2012
18.5
E
1962 MED DENIZLI
IMO 9106493
1,055 TEU 1996
18.5
E
1963 ELBSAILOR
IMO 9448695
1,085 TEU 2012
18.6
E
1964 MED CERKEZKOY
IMO 9147215
1,076 TEU 1998
18.6
E
1965 CONTSHIP ERA
IMO 9507702
1,118 TEU 2009
18.6
E
1966 MED URLA
IMO 9160920
847 TEU 1997
18.6
E
1967 MEDKON MAX
IMO 9347786
916 TEU 2006
18.6
E
1968 MAYFIELD
IMO 9216353
1,216 TEU 2001
18.7
E
1969 CONTSHIP JET
IMO 9348625
1,267 TEU 2007
18.7
E
1970 HELMUT
IMO 9354466
868 TEU 2006
18.7
E
1971 MSC LEVANTE F
IMO 9330264
1,080 TEU 2006
18.7
E
1972 CONTSHIP ECO
IMO 9492751
700 TEU 2008
18.8
E
1973 HANSA MUNKSUND
IMO 9429223
880 TEU 2012
18.8
E
1974 LYNN
IMO 9295531
855 TEU 2007
18.8
E
1975 BARBARA P
IMO 9144720
910 TEU 1997
18.8
E
1976 NOVA
IMO 9250098
966 TEU 2002
18.9
E
1977 BALTIC WHALE
IMO 9354454
868 TEU 2006
18.9
E
1978 WEC DE HOOGH
IMO 9315018
868 TEU 2005
19.0
E
1979 MEDKON CANAKKALE
IMO 9341964
698 TEU 2007
19.0
E
1980 IDA RAMBOW
IMO 9354478
1,008 TEU 2007
19.0
E
1981 ELBRUNNER
IMO 9395563
974 TEU 2009
19.0
E
1982 CHARLOTTA
IMO 9429209
880 TEU 2009
19.1
E
1983 ELBWAVE
IMO 9504035
1,036 TEU 2011
19.1
E
1984 JONA SOPHIE
IMO 9144718
910 TEU 1997
19.1
E
1985 BALLATA
IMO 9327578
1,100 TEU 2006
19.1
E
1986 MITO
IMO 9319571
1,118 TEU 2006
19.1
E
1987 GFS LYSA
IMO 9368730
1,338 TEU 2007
19.1
E
1988 ATLANTIC EXPRESS
IMO 9330850
1,100 TEU 2007
19.1
E
1989 MAUREN
IMO 9306251
1,100 TEU 2005
19.2
E
1990 WEC VAN RIJN
IMO 9315006
868 TEU 2005
19.2
E
1991 MSC AZURIT F
IMO 9403437
1,080 TEU 2008
19.2
E
1992 PHOENIX J
IMO 9504047
786 TEU 2010
19.3
E
1993 MSC ABIGAIL F
IMO 9330226
1,100 TEU 2006
19.3
E
1994 ISABELLA B
IMO 9483358
1,036 TEU 2012
19.3
E
1995 KILIA
IMO 9412517
880 TEU 2010
19.3
E
1996 VERA A
IMO 9372585
1,022 TEU 2011
19.3
E
1997 CMA CGM WEST
IMO 9396610
1,350 TEU 2008
19.4
E
1998 MEDKON ANA
IMO 9308596
916 TEU 2005
19.4
E
1999 AKHISAR
IMO 9237149
600 TEU 2001
19.4
E
2000 CONTSHIP TOP
IMO 9395616
1,100 TEU 2008
19.4
E
Page 40 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.