Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,647 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
13.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+31% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 551 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q4
101
'27 Q1
72
'27 Q2
77
'27 Q3
95
'27 Q4
118
'28 Q1
105
'28 Q2
94
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1601 CMA CGM FORT SAINT CHARLES
IMO 9809849
3,300 TEU 2019
13.3
D
1602 MARSA PRIDE
IMO 9301445
2,556 TEU 2005
13.3
D
1603 ELBINSEL
IMO 9977426
20,128 2024
13.3
D
1604 SONGA PUMA
IMO 9399789
2,797 TEU 2009
13.3
D
1605 KAAN KALKAVAN
IMO 9365879
1,849 TEU 2012
13.3
D
1606 CMA CGM AQABA
IMO 9334820
1,740 TEU 2007
13.3
D
1607 CMA CGM MAPUTO
IMO 9491628
1,710 TEU 2011
13.4
D
1608 MED CESME
IMO 9256365
1,740 TEU 2003
13.4
D
1609 MUSTAFA DAYI
IMO 9365855
1,849 TEU 2005
13.4
D
1610 CMA CGM FUZHOU
IMO 9596313
1,740 TEU 2014
13.4
D
1611 VEGA COLIGNY
IMO 9939876
1,868 TEU 2023
13.4
D
1612 MSC BELLE
IMO 9203904
1,116 TEU 1998
13.4
D
1613 MARLA BULL
IMO 9932945
1,900 TEU 2015
13.4
D
1614 BG BLUE
IMO 9964625
1,400 TEU 2021
13.4
D
1615 LUEBECK
IMO 9216092
1,078 TEU 2001
13.4
D
1616 CAPE FRANKLIN
IMO 9359301
1,440 TEU 2006
13.5
D
1617 LION
IMO 9208356
1,716 TEU 2000
13.5
D
1618 ANNABA
IMO 9306201
1,578 TEU 2006
13.5
D
1619 CMA CGM SAHARA
IMO 9220861
2,207 TEU 2002
13.6
D
1620 CMA CGM FORT ROYAL
IMO 9809837
3,300 TEU 2019
13.6
D
1621 AVA D
IMO 9306225
1,574 TEU 2007
13.6
D
1622 KESTREL
IMO 9626558
1,805 TEU 2013
13.6
D
1623 BFAD PACIFIC
IMO 9364203
2,474 TEU 2006
13.6
D
1624 ESPERANCE
IMO 9491484
1,436 TEU 2011
13.6
D
1625 GARWOOD
IMO 9347255
1,819 TEU 2008
13.7
D
1626 ELBBRIDGE
IMO 9968920
1,400 TEU 2021
13.7
D
1627 JOANNA
IMO 9204477
1,730 TEU 1999
13.7
D
1628 SPRING C
IMO 9308027
3,450 TEU 2007
13.7
E
1629 MSC JIANI
IMO 9966934
1,800 TEU 2023
13.7
E
1630 MSC ALBA F
IMO 9499010
1,022 TEU 2008
13.7
E
1631 CMA CGM ABIDJAN
IMO 9323481
1,740 TEU 2006
13.7
E
1632 X-PRESS SAGARMALA
IMO 9862736
1,800 TEU 2021
13.8
E
1633 NEVZAT KALKAVAN
IMO 9365867
1,849 TEU 2005
13.8
E
1634 MSC ADRIANA II
IMO 9169055
1,388 TEU 1998
13.8
E
1635 AS NURIA
IMO 9391787
3,534 TEU 2009
13.8
E
1636 MSC ASSUNTA III
IMO 9243590
2,754 TEU 2004
13.8
E
1637 CTM ISTMO
IMO 9430870
1,740 TEU 2010
13.9
E
1638 MSC TAMISHKA F
IMO 9358905
1,304 TEU 2007
13.9
E
1639 MSC PANAYA
IMO 9217565
1,730 TEU 2000
13.9
E
1640 ATOUT
IMO 9354648
1,698 TEU 2010
13.9
E
1641 AURETTE A
IMO 9242285
1,223 TEU 2002
14.0
E
1642 CMA CGM CAYENNE
IMO 9709192
2,100 TEU 2015
14.0
E
1643 CMA CGM SUEZ
IMO 9312652
1,740 TEU 2006
14.1
E
1644 MERIOS
IMO 9264764
657 TEU 2003
14.2
E
1645 PAN GG
IMO 9236286
1,155 TEU 2002
14.2
E
1646 MAERSK NAMIBIA
IMO 9289180
2,100 TEU 2004
14.3
E
1647 TANGER A
IMO 9330939
1,440 TEU 2007
14.3
E
1648 CMA CGM MARSEILLE
IMO 9709207
2,100 TEU 2015
14.3
E
1649 MEDKON SAMSUN
IMO 9305934
700 TEU 2004
14.4
E
1650 CMA CGM NACALA
IMO 9550307
1,577 TEU 2009
14.4
E
Page 33 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.