Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,841 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
18.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
+82% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,080 at D/E
A 313B 411C 706D 598E 482

2,510 rated vessels · 553 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

97
Q4
100
'27 Q1
72
'27 Q2
77
'27 Q3
94
'27 Q4
119
'28 Q1
105
'28 Q2
96
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,612 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,443 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,346 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 903 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 744 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 370 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

636
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,195–7,560M
capex range, top measure per vessel (636 of 636 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1801 ALEXANDER L
IMO 9431343
1,368 TEU 2011
19.2
E
1802 ELBWAVE
IMO 9504035
1,000 TEU 2011
19.3
E
1803 LARS D
IMO 9252797
862 TEU 2003
19.3
E
1804 ELBSTROM
IMO 9369007
974 TEU 2008
19.4
E
1805 ISABELLA B
IMO 9483358
1,036 TEU 2012
19.4
E
1806 ELBSKY
IMO 9412531
1,025 TEU 2011
19.4
E
1807 CONTSHIP TOP
IMO 9395616
1,080 TEU 2008
19.5
E
1808 HENNEKE RAMBOW
IMO 9354430
868 TEU 2007
19.6
E
1809 JAGUAR
IMO 9127007
1,122 TEU 1996
19.7
E
1810 BEATE
IMO 9333345
868 TEU 2005
19.7
E
1811 MITO
IMO 9319571
1,118 TEU 2006
19.7
E
1812 NORDICA
IMO 9483695
1,036 TEU 2011
19.7
E
1813 ARIES J
IMO 9514767
1,036 TEU 2011
19.8
E
1814 CONTSHIP ACE
IMO 9348637
1,267 TEU 2008
19.9
E
1815 LILA CANADA
IMO 9332717
1,118 TEU 2006
19.9
E
1816 KILIA
IMO 9412517
1,025 TEU 2010
20.0
E
1817 SC PHILLY
IMO 9330276
1,100 TEU 2007
20.0
E
1818 HEINRICH
IMO 9584475
1,036 TEU 2012
20.0
E
1819 ELI A
IMO 9326976
868 TEU 2005
20.1
E
1820 AS SARA
IMO 9410272
1,713 TEU 2010
20.1
E
1821 NIEVES B
IMO 9483683
1,036 TEU 2011
20.1
E
1822 HELENA SCHEPERS
IMO 9584487
1,036 TEU 2012
20.1
E
1823 ZIM NEW ZEALAND
IMO 9366471
1,155 TEU 2007
20.2
E
1824 CONTSHIP NEW
IMO 9373905
1,118 TEU 2007
20.2
E
1825 VISITOR
IMO 9297606
862 TEU 2004
20.2
E
1826 PERSEUS
IMO 9371414
925 TEU 2008
20.2
E
1827 AKHISAR
IMO 9237149
600 TEU 2000
20.3
E
1828 SONATA
IMO 9316103
1,118 TEU 2006
20.3
E
1829 KATHERINE BORCHARD
IMO 9246530
862 TEU 2004
20.3
E
1830 PHOENIX J
IMO 9504047
1,036 TEU 2010
20.3
E
1831 BG JADE
IMO 9803687
1,004 TEU 2018
20.3
E
1832 WES GESA
IMO 9504061
1,000 TEU 2012
20.3
E
1833 ELBSAILOR
IMO 9448695
1,085 TEU 2012
20.3
E
1834 CHARLOTTA
IMO 9429209
877 TEU 2009
20.4
E
1835 LEYLA KALKAVAN
IMO 9126924
1,145 TEU 1997
20.4
E
1836 ATLANTIC MERCHANT
IMO 9378929
1,118 TEU 2008
20.4
E
1837 CMA CGM NADOR
IMO 9396696
1,036 TEU 2007
20.4
E
1838 WEC VERMEER
IMO 9237371
868 TEU 2001
20.5
E
1839 LOLA B
IMO 9353723
917 TEU 2007
20.5
E
1840 BG SAPPHIRE
IMO 9803699
1,004 TEU 2018
20.5
E
1841 ELBTRADER
IMO 9388534
974 TEU 2008
20.5
E
1842 ZIM AUSTRALIA
IMO 9366445
1,155 TEU 2007
20.5
E
1843 NCL AVERØY
IMO 9326990
868 TEU 2006
20.5
E
1844 CACHALOT
IMO 9212022
1,216 TEU 2000
20.5
E
1845 MAUREN
IMO 9306251
1,118 TEU 2005
20.6
E
1846 ANDANTE
IMO 9354387
868 TEU 2007
20.6
E
1847 SSF LILY
IMO 9318266
1,155 TEU 2005
20.6
E
1848 DAGMAR
IMO 9354399
868 TEU 2006
20.7
E
1849 ADMIRAL MOON
IMO 9437220
990 TEU 2008
20.7
E
1850 TITAN
IMO 9126998
1,122 TEU 1996
20.7
E
Page 37 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.