Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#822 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
12.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-13% greener
B

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
800 TAIGA DESGAGNES
IMO 9303302
17,287 2007
12.0
B
802 ATA 1
IMO 9378010
6,555 2006
12.0
B
803 OCEAN DREAM
IMO 9519511
11,939 2009
12.0
B
804 SIDER LONDON
IMO 9528706
14,121 2009
12.0
B
806 CONDOR VALPARAISO
IMO 9473224
17,257 2011
12.1
B
808 ARKLOW BEACH
IMO 9638783
8,650 2014
12.1
B
805 GARIP BABA
IMO 9564970
8,639 2010
12.1
B
807 REGINA
IMO 9370111
14,390 2008
12.1
B
809 AAL DAMPIER
IMO 9521540
18,707 2011
12.1
B
810 ABILITY
IMO 9145645
17,440 1998
12.1
B
811 WHITE STAR
IMO 9381938
9,223 2007
12.1
B
812 ARKLOW ABBEY
IMO 9851933
8,543 2019
12.1
B
813 ARKLOW ARCHER
IMO 9851969
8,543 2020
12.1
B
814 SELVAAGSUND
IMO 9956862
8,534 2023
12.1
B
816 ZEA SERVANT
IMO 9741126
12,302 2018
12.1
B
815 ESL EUROPA
IMO 9333553
17,300 2007
12.1
B
817 ECO TREASURE
IMO 9938690
9,072 2024
12.1
B
819 EKMEN TRANS
IMO 9204348
6,687 1999
12.1
B
818 PINDO
IMO 9504138
11,023 2011
12.1
B
820 AMY
IMO 1034319
12,500 2015
12.1
B
821 SPIKEN
IMO 9988504
5,080 2024
12.2
B
824 TEONA
IMO 9648843
7,371 2013
12.2
B
823 ESL AMERICA
IMO 9347035
17,349 2006
12.2
B
822 DENIZ AKAY
IMO 9349447
10,501 2010
12.2
B
825 ARKLOW BEACON
IMO 9638795
8,661 2014
12.2
B
826 KLARA
IMO 9115896
3,270 1995
12.2
B
827 MARIO C
IMO 9364526
13,422 2019
12.2
B
828 MSC SHEILA F
IMO 9180968
16,211 1999
12.2
B
829 ARKLOW MEADOW
IMO 9440277
14,998 2010
12.2
B
831 TRIO CAN BERAT
IMO 8922254
4,245 1992
12.2
B
830 EVA
IMO 9435105
12,764 2008
12.2
B
832 BBC TOKYO
IMO 9971434
13,418 2025
12.2
B
833 OCEAN FORCE
IMO 8821814
12,150 1990
12.2
B
835 ARNEBORG
IMO 9333539
17,356 2006
12.3
B
834 AYADA
IMO 9268863
7,020 2005
12.3
B
836 EMS LIBERTY
IMO 1022299
4,700 2025
12.3
B
837 KEREM KARABEKIR
IMO 9452127
5,594 2007
12.3
B
839 SABAHAT SONAY
IMO 9370525
14,888 2007
12.3
B
838 BRIGITTE F
IMO 8504234
3,732 1985
12.3
B
840 AYSSEL
IMO 9155896
7,010 1997
12.3
B
841 TOI CHALLENGER
IMO 9151515
21,146 1997
12.3
B
842 KAIE
IMO 9504102
11,198 2010
12.3
B
843 BOLTEN PANORAMA
IMO 9495583
26,449 2012
12.3
B
849 EBROBORG
IMO 9463451
11,219 2010
12.3
B
848 HALISDEMIR
IMO 9517331
7,394 2008
12.3
B
847 GOLDEN LION
IMO 9363974
6,315 2006
12.3
B
846 KSL AMARA
IMO 9644744
13,077 2013
12.3
B
845 KEITH
IMO 9736195
12,234 2019
12.3
B
844 ALASKABORG
IMO 9466374
17,294 2012
12.3
B
850 AYSTAR
IMO 9257204
3,276 2001
12.3
B
Page 17 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.