Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,777 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
16.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+63% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1751 MSC EDITH II
IMO 9169029
1,388 TEU 1998
17.6
E
1752 CONTSHIP LEX
IMO 9346562
1,114 TEU 2006
17.6
E
1753 MEDKON CANAKKALE
IMO 9341964
698 TEU 2007
17.6
E
1754 ANINA
IMO 9354351
1,008 TEU 2006
17.7
E
1755 ATLANTIC EXPRESS
IMO 9330850
1,114 TEU 2007
17.7
E
1756 AKACIA
IMO 9315020
1,008 TEU 2005
17.7
E
1757 ELBSPRING
IMO 9412529
1,025 TEU 2010
17.7
E
1758 SVENDBORG
IMO 9454230
1,084 TEU 2011
17.8
E
1759 CMA CGM NOUADHIBOU
IMO 9376892
1,341 TEU 2007
17.8
E
1760 JONA SOPHIE
IMO 9144718
942 TEU 1997
17.8
E
1761 MSC CAITLIN
IMO 9169043
1,388 TEU 1998
17.8
E
1762 HANNA
IMO 9376048
868 TEU 2008
17.8
E
1763 MED TEKIRDAG
IMO 9265598
1,100 TEU 2003
17.9
E
1764 NORDIC ITALIA
IMO 9474395
1,085 TEU 2012
17.9
E
1765 ELBWATER
IMO 9504073
1,000 TEU 2012
17.9
E
1766 MED DENIZLI
IMO 9106493
1,055 TEU 1996
17.9
E
1767 AMINA
IMO 9448683
1,085 TEU 2011
17.9
E
1768 CONTSHIP ECO
IMO 9492751
700 TEU 2008
17.9
E
1769 WEC DE HOOGH
IMO 9315018
1,008 TEU 2005
18.0
E
1770 CONTSHIP BOX
IMO 9449845
1,496 TEU 2009
18.0
E
1771 NOVA
IMO 9250098
966 TEU 2002
18.0
E
1772 BAKKAFOSS
IMO 9429194
1,025 TEU 2009
18.1
E
1773 MSC WAVE F
IMO 9232462
962 TEU 2001
18.1
E
1774 EF ELENA
IMO 9368730
1,338 TEU 2007
18.2
E
1775 MED CORLU
IMO 9106479
1,055 TEU 1995
18.2
E
1776 CONTSHIP GIN
IMO 9517434
1,345 TEU 2011
18.2
E
1777 VERA RAMBOW
IMO 9432220
1,421 TEU 2008
18.2
E
1778 SC MEMPHIS
IMO 9324174
1,200 TEU 2005
18.3
E
1779 SKYVIEW
IMO 9358890
1,304 TEU 2007
18.3
E
1780 IDA RAMBOW
IMO 9354478
1,008 TEU 2007
18.3
E
1781 MSC CHARLOTTE
IMO 9330238
1,092 TEU 2007
18.3
E
1782 MARIELYST
IMO 9448669
1,080 TEU 2010
18.4
E
1783 EVER PRIDE
IMO 9249233
1,206 TEU 2003
18.4
E
1784 BARBARA P
IMO 9144720
942 TEU 1997
18.5
E
1785 MAYFIELD
IMO 9216353
1,216 TEU 2001
18.5
E
1786 TRADEWIND
IMO 9367944
907 TEU 2007
18.5
E
1787 MERITO
IMO 9167942
1,104 TEU 1998
18.6
E
1788 ATLANTIC SILVER
IMO 9396622
1,338 TEU 2008
18.7
E
1789 NORDIC PORTO
IMO 9448671
1,085 TEU 2011
18.7
E
1790 WEC FRANS HALS
IMO 9326964
862 TEU 2005
18.8
E
1791 MSC ABIGAIL F
IMO 9330226
1,102 TEU 2006
18.8
E
1792 ELBSUN
IMO 9429261
877 TEU 2012
18.8
E
1793 NAVI BALTIC
IMO 9386718
1,425 TEU 2009
18.8
E
1794 OEL INDIA
IMO 9351816
620 TEU 2005
18.9
E
1795 MSC VERA F
IMO 9235610
1,102 TEU 2003
19.0
E
1796 KATHARINA SCHEPERS
IMO 9584865
1,036 TEU 2012
19.1
E
1797 MSC SIGMA F
IMO 9330240
1,100 TEU 2007
19.1
E
1798 BG ORANGE
IMO 9964637
1,400 TEU 2021
19.1
E
1799 SKALAR
IMO 9458975
1,000 TEU 2012
19.2
E
1800 MUNKSUND
IMO 9429223
1,025 TEU 2012
19.2
E
Page 36 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.