Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#601 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
7.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-20% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
602 COURAGE
IMO 9335056
45,965 2008
7.6
C
601 DORADO CHEM
IMO 9296119
40,952 2005
7.6
C
603 AQUARIUS
IMO 9354272
34,999 2007
7.6
C
605 SILVER MANOORA
IMO 9718844
49,897 2013
7.6
C
604 KRITI RUBY
IMO 9391282
50,349 2006
7.6
C
606 TORM LEADER
IMO 9343194
46,070 2009
7.6
C
607 DORIC BREEZE
IMO 9637129
51,565 2013
7.6
C
608 GULF FANATIR
IMO 9359868
45,920 2008
7.6
C
610 GOLDEN THETIS
IMO 1037701
25,918 2025
7.6
C
609 SC VIRGO
IMO 9801093
40,870 2018
7.6
C
611 STOLT ENDURANCE
IMO 9284697
32,858 2004
7.6
C
612 FAITHFUL STAR
IMO 9228320
34,465 2000
7.6
C
613 OPERA
IMO 9804887
37,245 2020
7.6
C
614 THE JUDGE
IMO 9755725
37,770 2016
7.6
C
615 CHEMROAD WING
IMO 9309502
32,051 2005
7.6
C
617 STOLT PRIDE
IMO 9680073
38,961 2016
7.7
C
616 HATAY
IMO 9354258
51,218 2006
7.7
C
618 ORLANDO
IMO 9420851
38,334 2009
7.7
C
619 AL REEM
IMO 9430296
46,046 2010
7.7
C
620 HACI KEMAL KA
IMO 9315757
37,627 2003
7.7
C
621 THEANOULA
IMO 9935557
39,855 2022
7.7
C
623 STOLT BRELAND
IMO 9414084
43,475 2010
7.7
C
622 SEAPRIDE
IMO 9629562
50,660 2011
7.7
C
625 STOLT CALLUNA
IMO 9744893
32,771 2017
7.7
C
624 YANKUL SILVER
IMO 9718791
45,923 2016
7.7
C
626 STI WEMBLEY
IMO 9691735
38,734 2014
7.7
C
627 ROOIBOS GALAXY
IMO 9920306
19,993 2022
7.7
C
628 CIELO DI NEW YORK
IMO 9669665
39,990 2014
7.7
C
629 BOCHEM CASABLANCA
IMO 9956410
26,644 2021
7.7
C
630 BOW GEMINI
IMO 9752034
40,895 2017
7.7
C
632 BOCHEM OSLO
IMO 9420710
33,654 2010
7.8
C
631 MTM TORTOLA
IMO 9742065
22,396 2016
7.8
C
633 DALE
IMO 9353084
37,280 2008
7.8
C
634 AKTI A
IMO 9935569
39,847 2022
7.8
C
635 SAKURA BELLE
IMO 9568500
26,960 2011
7.8
C
636 SHENGHUI GLORY
IMO 9724037
19,883 2015
7.8
C
638 BOW FIRDA
IMO 9250751
37,427 2003
7.8
C
637 NCC HUDA
IMO 9399272
45,459 2011
7.8
C
641 STOLT SAGALAND
IMO 9352200
44,044 2008
7.8
C
640 GINGA BLUE SHARK
IMO 9804837
25,202 2019
7.8
C
639 CHEMROAD HOPE
IMO 9565754
33,552 2011
7.8
C
642 CAROLE M
IMO 9732797
37,596 2016
7.8
C
643 STOLT BISMUTH
IMO 9739290
27,570 2016
7.9
C
648 CHEM NICHOLAS
IMO 9374416
38,396 2007
7.9
C
647 SEA CUMULUS
IMO 9724532
39,999 2016
7.9
C
646 BERNICE
IMO 9220926
42,721 2001
7.9
C
645 BAGHEERA
IMO 9670949
39,999 2014
7.9
C
644 CHEM RAMBLAS
IMO 9937995
33,374 2024
7.9
C
649 SERENGETI PARK
IMO 9992579
19,970 2025
7.9
C
650 NOCTURNE
IMO 9804863
37,245 2020
7.9
C
Page 13 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.