Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#335 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-36% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 561 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,601 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,492 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 2,492 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,098
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,098 of 1,098 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
302 JEN LR
IMO 9947249
82,411 2023
3.0
A
301 PORT FUKUOKA
IMO 9932799
64,611 2022
3.0
A
303 GEMMA
IMO 9602784
313,049 2012
3.0
A
308 THUNDER ISLAND
IMO 9897901
82,558 2021
3.0
A
306 ROYAL NEPTUNE
IMO 9851517
80,873 2020
3.0
A
309 JAG AMAR
IMO 9723851
82,083 2017
3.0
A
305 BABY HERCULES
IMO 9478822
110,861 2011
3.0
A
307 PENGLAI
IMO 9952438
82,236 2023
3.0
A
304 EPIC RADIANCE
IMO 9970234
82,555 2024
3.0
A
310 ARTEMIS I
IMO 9830991
80,976 2019
3.0
A
311 MARINI
IMO 9639529
205,854 2014
3.0
A
315 AQUAVITA WEALTH
IMO 9985784
64,700 2024
3.1
A
314 EASTERN GLAMOUR
IMO 9459345
115,461 2011
3.1
A
313 RIO DULCE
IMO 9501617
178,076 2011
3.1
A
312 CHAILEASE BLOSSOM
IMO 9622540
82,146 2013
3.1
A
316 HSL VEGAS
IMO 9928372
81,981 2022
3.1
A
317 PEDHOULAS COMMANDER
IMO 9381524
83,684 2008
3.1
A
319 SSI INTERCEPTOR
IMO 9919008
63,896 2023
3.1
A
318 PYXIS OCEAN
IMO 9798856
79,898 2017
3.1
A
320 EPIC HARMONY
IMO 9922005
82,546 2021
3.1
A
321 CLIVIA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9599195
98,704 2013
3.1
A
324 LEO IRIS
IMO 9709001
81,820 2015
3.1
A
323 MG MERCURY
IMO 9774290
84,790 2016
3.1
A
322 BW MATSUYAMA
IMO 9836488
81,810 2019
3.1
A
327 NBA RUBENS
IMO 9477220
107,290 2011
3.1
A
326 BTG MISTI
IMO 9952488
82,235 2023
3.1
A
325 CL ZHANGJIAJIE
IMO 9953365
64,766 2024
3.1
A
329 MAIRAKI
IMO 9444546
181,016 2011
3.1
A
328 PENELOPE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9464596
114,861 2010
3.1
A
330 SEACON HAMBURG
IMO 9936276
85,505 2023
3.1
A
332 SEACON TOKYO
IMO 9941958
66,628 2023
3.1
A
331 NAVIOS FULVIA
IMO 9500986
179,263 2010
3.1
A
334 JOSCO DAZHOU
IMO 9934187
64,247 2022
3.1
A
333 SASEBO GREEN
IMO 9675468
77,880 2014
3.1
A
337 TRUSTN TRADER
IMO 9937555
82,245 2023
3.1
A
338 LUCKY JESSICA
IMO 9332793
77,247 2006
3.1
A
336 MEDI EGADI
IMO 9802217
81,874 2018
3.1
A
344 PUPLINGE
IMO 9782156
81,672 2016
3.1
A
339 AQUAVITA AIR
IMO 9846110
82,192 2020
3.1
A
335 BBG MUARA
IMO 9929003
81,991 2022
3.1
A
343 CMB RUBENS
IMO 9832640
63,514 2018
3.1
A
342 SEAGEM
IMO 9758375
81,714 2019
3.1
A
341 SEAHUNTER
IMO 9974424
63,253 2024
3.1
A
340 KYPROS BRAVERY
IMO 9694490
77,997 2015
3.1
A
345 OCEANIA GRAECA
IMO 9841952
82,033 2019
3.1
A
350 PRAIRIE
IMO 9860506
81,614 2019
3.1
A
349 PHILIPP OLDENDORFF
IMO 9540869
115,156 2012
3.1
A
348 CIARA MARU
IMO 9932098
82,626 2022
3.1
A
347 MYRTO C
IMO 9752383
81,011 2017
3.1
A
346 CSSC AMSTERDAM
IMO 9853890
120,565 2020
3.1
A
Page 7 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.