Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,131 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
22.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+132% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 551 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q4
101
'27 Q1
72
'27 Q2
77
'27 Q3
95
'27 Q4
118
'28 Q1
105
'28 Q2
94
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2101 K-OCEAN
IMO 9143972
700 TEU 1998
23.6
E
2102 MSC ANNE F
IMO 9347803
916 TEU 2007
23.7
E
2103 ELBCARRIER
IMO 9388510
974 TEU 2007
23.7
E
2104 CT ROTTERDAM
IMO 9395575
974 TEU 2009
23.7
E
2105 CANDELARIA B
IMO 9277395
822 TEU 2003
23.7
E
2106 ATLANTICO
IMO 9641314
875 TEU 2014
23.8
E
2107 HENRIKE SCHEPERS
IMO 9404091
793 TEU 2008
23.8
E
2108 X-PRESS GODAVARI
IMO 9353735
917 TEU 2008
23.9
E
2109 RIDER
IMO 9322566
803 TEU 2006
23.9
E
2110 FENJA
IMO 9287716
822 TEU 2003
23.9
E
2111 NANTO
IMO 9083043
749 TEU 1994
24.0
E
2112 ANDREA
IMO 9333357
868 TEU 2005
24.0
E
2113 BG IRELAND
IMO 9355446
962 TEU 2007
24.1
E
2114 HELGAFELL
IMO 9306017
909 TEU 2005
24.1
E
2115 BF CARODA
IMO 9297618
862 TEU 2004
24.1
E
2116 FREYA
IMO 9219874
658 TEU 2000
24.2
E
2117 BERNHARD SCHEPERS
IMO 9492505
1,036 TEU 2011
24.2
E
2118 ILHA DA MADEIRA
IMO 9202077
712 TEU 1999
24.2
E
2119 NJORD
IMO 9349227
809 TEU 2007
24.3
E
2120 MIRROR
IMO 9328041
803 TEU 2007
24.3
E
2121 EF AVA
IMO 9389306
698 TEU 2008
24.3
E
2122 RIJNBORG
IMO 9355812
1,700 TEU 2007
24.4
E
2123 ADMIRAL MOON
IMO 9437220
990 TEU 2008
24.4
E
2124 MSC SAGITTARIUS F
IMO 9491616
957 TEU 2012
24.4
E
2125 JORK RULER
IMO 9328027
803 TEU 2006
24.4
E
2126 SANTUCA B
IMO 9287687
822 TEU 2003
24.4
E
2127 SAMSKIP INNOVATOR
IMO 9436214
803 TEU 2011
24.5
E
2128 MSC LENA F
IMO 9347762
916 TEU 2006
24.5
E
2129 PANDA 002
IMO 9328053
803 TEU 2007
24.6
E
2130 SPIRIT
IMO 9302255
809 TEU 2005
24.7
E
2131 VERONICA B
IMO 9436305
812 TEU 2011
24.7
E
2132 K-RIVER
IMO 9138355
700 TEU 1997
24.8
E
2133 ENCOUNTER
IMO 9255775
750 TEU 2004
24.9
E
2134 EMILIA
IMO 9197521
700 TEU 2010
24.9
E
2135 ALEXANDER
IMO 9347798
957 TEU 2006
25.1
E
2136 ENFORCER
IMO 9255737
750 TEU 2003
25.2
E
2137 ADMIRAL SUN
IMO 9437244
990 TEU 2008
25.2
E
2138 RANGER
IMO 9322542
803 TEU 2005
25.2
E
2139 AURORA
IMO 9234989
868 TEU 2001
25.2
E
2140 MACARENA B
IMO 9277400
822 TEU 2003
25.2
E
2141 CMA CGM NADOR
IMO 9396696
1,036 TEU 2007
25.2
E
2142 ELBSPRINTER
IMO 9349215
809 TEU 2007
25.3
E
2143 BF ESPERANZA
IMO 9252785
862 TEU 2003
25.3
E
2144 CONTSHIP IVY
IMO 9371402
925 TEU 2007
25.4
E
2145 MEDKON FUN
IMO 9308613
890 TEU 2006
25.4
E
2146 MAIKE D
IMO 9226372
660 TEU 2000
25.4
E
2147 SVEN-D
IMO 9302243
809 TEU 2005
25.4
E
2148 LILA CANADA
IMO 9332717
1,118 TEU 2006
25.4
E
2149 PONTA DO SOL
IMO 9141613
374 TEU 1997
25.4
E
2150 ELISABETH
IMO 9219862
658 TEU 2000
25.5
E
Page 43 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.