Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,140 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
14.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+48% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1101 STEN SKAGEN
IMO 9460239
18,531 2009
13.9
E
1102 TRANS IBERIA
IMO 9170597
19,733 1999
13.9
E
1103 GOLDEN CURL
IMO 9348522
17,088 2008
13.9
E
1104 IMERA
IMO 9458066
14,391 2011
14.0
E
1105 UACC MANAMA
IMO 9458822
45,612 2010
14.0
E
1106 SARAJEVO
IMO 9477490
11,320 2008
14.0
E
1107 EVA MANILA
IMO 9918602
19,860 2021
14.0
E
1108 KITIKMEOT W.
IMO 9421219
19,983 2010
14.0
E
1109 TRANS SEA
IMO 9956927
12,598 2023
14.0
E
1110 SLOMAN HERA
IMO 9466714
16,426 2012
14.0
E
1111 TRANS ADRIATIC
IMO 9263928
12,503 2002
14.1
E
1112 EVINCO
IMO 9308546
19,999 2005
14.1
E
1113 BESIKTAS ZEALAND
IMO 9431044
18,289 2009
14.1
E
1114 TATLISU
IMO 9282364
8,521 2003
14.1
E
1115 NEW SPIRIT
IMO 9337872
12,970 2008
14.1
E
1116 SONGA COSMOS
IMO 9457024
25,130 2010
14.1
E
1117 STOLT AGUILA
IMO 9391983
12,574 2009
14.1
E
1118 ARAL
IMO 8125454
8,915 1982
14.1
E
1119 ORIENTAL HIBISCUS
IMO 9908334
16,223 2021
14.2
E
1120 JUTLANDIA SWAN
IMO 9736638
12,442 2015
14.2
E
1121 SUNLIT
IMO 9340386
13,065 2007
14.2
E
1122 OWL 5
IMO 9439357
13,062 2007
14.2
E
1123 EMMY SCHULTE
IMO 9394519
16,669 2006
14.3
E
1124 GULLFJELLET
IMO 9724439
19,975 2015
14.3
E
1125 ARSLAND
IMO 9395989
16,791 2008
14.4
E
1126 SCORPIUS
IMO 9318228
11,249 2006
14.4
E
1127 EVA GOLD
IMO 9888132
19,894 2022
14.4
E
1128 ERIN SCHULTE
IMO 9439814
16,716 2006
14.4
E
1129 GINGA CARACAL
IMO 9426300
25,876 2009
14.5
E
1130 HARBOUR FEATURE
IMO 9473092
16,909 2011
14.5
E
1131 K INSET
IMO 9311634
12,956 2005
14.5
E
1132 WICKY SPIRIT
IMO 9404388
13,945 2008
14.6
E
1133 HARBOUR FOUNTAIN
IMO 9473107
16,929 2008
14.6
E
1134 LAGERTHA
IMO 9410143
19,999 2006
14.6
E
1135 SEN ARCHE
IMO 9443061
8,956 2008
14.6
E
1136 BROMLEY
IMO 9460502
17,568 2008
14.6
E
1137 EVA HANSA
IMO 9985980
19,945 2023
14.6
E
1138 OWL 1
IMO 9439369
13,053 2007
14.6
E
1139 EVA SCHULTE
IMO 9439826
16,621 2006
14.6
E
1140 SUNFLYTE
IMO 9228813
37,271 2001
14.7
E
1141 BALTIC ICE
IMO 9327401
37,100 2006
14.7
E
1142 CHEMICAL MARINER
IMO 9558971
14,301 2010
14.7
E
1143 RITA IEVOLI
IMO 9846471
15,882 2023
14.7
E
1144 LILY PG
IMO 9823390
7,330 2018
14.7
E
1145 ATLANTIC WIND
IMO 9341316
15,652 2007
14.8
E
1146 ORIS TRINITY
IMO 9438169
13,121 2009
14.8
E
1147 SCOT STUTTGART
IMO 9274549
8,184 2006
14.9
E
1148 AETHALIA
IMO 9373230
19,992 2008
14.9
E
1149 SALTSTRAUM
IMO 9854466
10,249 2020
14.9
E
1150 ALANGOVA
IMO 9411927
12,089 2008
14.9
E
Page 23 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.