Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#697 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-11% greener
C

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
651 CB BALTIC
IMO 9851701
37,874 2020
8.5
C
652 HAFNIA SOYA
IMO 9729271
39,067 2015
8.5
C
653 MH FUTURE
IMO 9986001
19,727 2024
8.5
C
654 STOLT MERCURY
IMO 9739329
27,578 2017
8.5
C
655 SOLAR SUZANNE
IMO 9877638
25,039 2020
8.5
C
656 BOW NEON
IMO 9777369
27,601 2017
8.5
C
657 SAGAMI
IMO 9379911
33,614 2008
8.5
C
658 LADY RINA
IMO 9631383
39,310 2012
8.5
C
659 ANGI
IMO 9253246
37,211 2003
8.5
C
660 EASTERLY LIME GALAXY
IMO 9380972
19,992 2008
8.5
C
661 OTTO H
IMO 9749374
25,161 2016
8.6
C
662 RAMIRA
IMO 9890599
17,999 2021
8.6
C
663 CAROLINE
IMO 9262091
45,999 2002
8.6
C
664 TWIST
IMO 9422639
37,791 2009
8.6
C
665 FAIRCHEM KATANA
IMO 9749685
19,980 2016
8.6
C
666 WECO AMELIE
IMO 9693812
49,708 2015
8.7
C
667 CLOTILDE
IMO 9448310
38,375 2008
8.7
C
668 BOW LEOPARD
IMO 9952165
26,004 2023
8.7
C
669 MTM HAMBURG
IMO 9379844
20,564 2008
8.7
C
670 VALDERICE
IMO 9587843
37,583 2011
8.7
C
671 PRABHU LAL
IMO 9416044
19,859 2008
8.7
C
672 KRITI CAPTAIN
IMO 9335147
37,434 2007
8.7
C
673 UACC RIYADH
IMO 9458834
45,444 2011
8.7
C
674 SOLAR SHERIDAN
IMO 9877652
25,039 2021
8.7
C
675 ULUC KA
IMO 9228801
37,272 2001
8.7
C
676 UACC MANSOURIA
IMO 9489089
45,293 2013
8.7
C
677 ATLAS STAR
IMO 9376828
38,289 2008
8.7
C
678 UOG ANDROS
IMO 9480162
45,562 2014
8.7
C
679 AQUA RAY
IMO 9973676
21,950 2023
8.7
C
680 STOLT VANGUARD
IMO 9274305
25,261 2004
8.7
C
681 RUI FU SHENG
IMO 9379129
46,846 2007
8.7
C
682 GOLD TRADER
IMO 9907005
33,293 2022
8.8
C
683 SAANA
IMO 9739836
17,991 2018
8.8
C
684 RAMELIA
IMO 9818280
17,994 2019
8.8
C
685 ANTIOCHIA KA
IMO 9311751
36,993 2006
8.8
C
686 LOUIS P
IMO 9749336
25,161 2016
8.8
C
687 FAIRCHEM PROTEA
IMO 9908346
19,959 2021
8.8
C
688 SUNRISE RAY
IMO 9829679
19,976 2018
8.8
C
689 AMBER RAY
IMO 9973664
21,945 2023
8.8
C
690 STOLT SINCERITY
IMO 9680085
38,850 2016
8.8
C
691 GINGA HAMMERHEAD
IMO 9829760
25,179 2019
8.8
C
692 EK-RIVER
IMO 9808259
19,884 2018
8.8
C
693 TERN FORS
IMO 9909651
15,034 2022
8.8
C
694 PEONIA
IMO 9313436
28,987 2005
8.8
C
695 MONAX
IMO 9311256
20,645 2005
8.8
C
696 STOLT BOBCAT
IMO 9511167
23,432 2009
8.8
C
697 CARIA KA
IMO 9327360
37,067 2006
8.8
C
698 MINERVA TYCHI
IMO 9723291
39,070 2016
8.9
C
699 FAIRCHEM LOYALTY
IMO 9791183
22,322 2019
8.9
C
700 LIPARI M
IMO 9587817
37,583 2011
8.9
C
Page 14 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.