Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,644 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
9.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
+90% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1601 ATLANTIC T
IMO 9403322
45,989 2009
9.0
E
1602 HISTRIA CROWN
IMO 9607629
40,390 2012
9.0
E
1603 SAN FELIX
IMO 9314868
37,312 2007
9.0
E
1604 STARLIGHT I
IMO 9377664
37,824 2007
9.0
E
1605 STI ROTHERHITHE
IMO 9706475
38,734 2015
9.0
E
1606 DAN SABIA
IMO 9513438
59,317 2012
9.1
E
1607 PUTUOSHAN
IMO 9286542
19,822 2004
9.1
E
1608 DAN CISNE
IMO 9513440
59,335 2011
9.1
E
1609 THE BLACKSMITH
IMO 9659660
31,289 2013
9.1
E
1610 MELORIA
IMO 9292280
40,157 2006
9.2
E
1611 MINERVA VASO
IMO 9318008
50,921 2003
9.2
E
1612 KRITI ROCK
IMO 9392315
45,920 2008
9.2
E
1613 ZEAL START
IMO 9379064
41,369 2006
9.3
E
1614 SEACOD
IMO 9352315
40,559 2006
9.3
E
1615 EAGLE BARENTS
IMO 9676125
119,690 2015
9.3
E
1616 BIT WIND
IMO 9904053
13,823 2022
9.3
E
1617 OSAKA
IMO 9380570
37,923 2008
9.3
E
1618 AMBER BEE
IMO 9316608
40,084 2008
9.3
E
1619 NEW FRIENDSHIP
IMO 9249180
104,801 2001
9.3
E
1620 PHOENIX AN
IMO 9299496
38,512 2005
9.3
E
1621 STI BATTERSEA
IMO 9691723
38,734 2014
9.4
E
1622 MAERSK KATARINA
IMO 9431290
39,723 2011
9.4
E
1623 VALSESIA
IMO 9385178
37,481 2008
9.4
E
1624 COSTANZA M
IMO 9436680
40,042 2009
9.4
E
1625 VALTELLINA
IMO 9384136
37,481 2008
9.4
E
1626 CHEM SELENIUM
IMO 9817509
19,998 2018
9.4
E
1627 ANDROMEDA
IMO 9315795
39,378 2007
9.4
E
1628 AEGEAS
IMO 9315800
39,378 2007
9.4
E
1629 YURIY KUCHIEV
IMO 9804033
52,292 2019
9.5
E
1630 SOUTHERN QUOKKA
IMO 9792010
26,077 2017
9.5
E
1631 STI COMANDANTE
IMO 9686857
38,734 2014
9.5
E
1632 WINNIPEG
IMO 9852133
28,627 2019
9.5
E
1633 CHRYSOPIGI
IMO 9303728
38,554 2006
9.5
E
1634 MINERVA LYDIA
IMO 9262900
47,999 2004
9.6
E
1635 YASH
IMO 9231183
37,320 2002
9.6
E
1636 HELENE MAERSK
IMO 9389514
38,016 2010
9.6
E
1637 CHEM BARIUM
IMO 9838670
19,999 2019
9.6
E
1638 SEAVALOUR
IMO 9315771
46,702 2007
9.6
E
1639 SEATROUT
IMO 9352303
40,600 2006
9.6
E
1640 YUKON
IMO 9852145
28,627 2020
9.6
E
1641 YANBU
IMO 9376816
38,374 2008
9.6
E
1642 HENNING MAERSK
IMO 9389526
38,001 2010
9.6
E
1643 EMERALD
IMO 9391945
47,302 2009
9.7
E
1644 FAIR WINDS
IMO 9327009
73,976 2004
9.7
E
1645 ANWAAR AFRIQYA
IMO 9275268
34,656 2004
9.7
E
1646 DINA F
IMO 9367750
47,401 2009
9.7
E
1647 VALLE DI CORDOBA
IMO 9295311
40,218 2005
9.8
E
1648 HANS MAERSK
IMO 9389497
37,961 2009
9.8
E
1649 VALLE DI GRANADA
IMO 9292278
40,218 2005
9.8
E
1650 XT PROSPERITY
IMO 9989560
13,185 2024
9.8
E
Page 33 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.