Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,900 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
20.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
+99% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,080 at D/E
A 313B 411C 706D 598E 482

2,510 rated vessels · 551 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

97
Q4
100
'27 Q1
72
'27 Q2
77
'27 Q3
94
'27 Q4
119
'28 Q1
105
'28 Q2
96
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,671 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,443 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,346 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 952 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 782 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 370 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

636
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,283–7,763M
capex range, top measure per vessel (636 of 636 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.64 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1851 MARSA VIRGO
IMO 9324954
1,118 TEU 2006
20.7
E
1852 HERCULES J
IMO 9430193
1,036 TEU 2009
20.8
E
1853 TUNADAL
IMO 9429235
1,025 TEU 2012
20.9
E
1854 RUTH
IMO 9376036
868 TEU 2008
20.9
E
1855 MSC AZURIT F
IMO 9403437
1,118 TEU 2008
20.9
E
1856 BALTIC SHEARWATER
IMO 9313228
1,638 TEU 2005
21.0
E
1857 WILHELM
IMO 9376050
868 TEU 2008
21.0
E
1858 WEC CORNEILLE
IMO 9326940
862 TEU 2005
21.0
E
1859 X-PRESS SOUSSE
IMO 9354349
868 TEU 2006
21.0
E
1860 NEUENFELDE
IMO 9231846
868 TEU 2001
21.1
E
1861 EVI
IMO 9396634
1,335 TEU 2008
21.1
E
1862 MEDKON NLS
IMO 9390812
228 TEU 2006
21.1
E
1863 CONESTE
IMO 9252802
862 TEU 2003
21.1
E
1864 ELBTEAM
IMO 9429273
880 TEU 2012
21.1
E
1865 VEGA ALPHA
IMO 9301081
917 TEU 2005
21.1
E
1866 BIANCA RAMBOW
IMO 9297591
868 TEU 2004
21.1
E
1867 ATLANTIC GENEVA
IMO 9330848
1,100 TEU 2007
21.2
E
1868 BG EMERALD
IMO 9803704
1,004 TEU 2018
21.2
E
1869 ASTURIANO III
IMO 9406829
1,116 TEU 2007
21.3
E
1870 SARA BORCHARD
IMO 9354428
868 TEU 2007
21.3
E
1871 MASTERY D
IMO 9301201
917 TEU 2006
21.3
E
1872 PEYTON LYNN C
IMO 9295531
869 TEU 2007
21.3
E
1873 CARLOTA B
IMO 9404065
803 TEU 2007
21.3
E
1874 CONTSHIP VOW
IMO 9395599
1,080 TEU 2007
21.4
E
1875 JSP ROVER
IMO 9323467
803 TEU 2006
21.4
E
1876 QUEEN NM
IMO 9234991
868 TEU 2001
21.4
E
1877 PAVO J
IMO 9355458
962 TEU 2007
21.4
E
1878 IPIOS
IMO 9359117
1,118 TEU 2006
21.5
E
1879 JSP CARLA
IMO 9319868
750 TEU 2004
21.5
E
1880 WEC VAN RIJN
IMO 9315006
1,008 TEU 2005
21.5
E
1881 FALMOUTH
IMO 9266530
862 TEU 2002
21.6
E
1882 ELBFEEDER
IMO 9388522
974 TEU 2008
21.6
E
1883 BG DIAMOND
IMO 9803675
1,004 TEU 2017
21.6
E
1884 MONTE DA GUIA
IMO 9123788
636 TEU 1995
21.6
E
1885 ELBWINTER
IMO 9398773
1,036 TEU 2008
21.6
E
1886 ELBRUNNER
IMO 9395563
974 TEU 2009
21.7
E
1887 JPO GEMINI
IMO 9294020
2,478 TEU 2005
21.8
E
1888 MIRIAM BORCHARD
IMO 9246554
868 TEU 2004
21.8
E
1889 VIVIENNE SHERI D
IMO 9371426
925 TEU 2009
21.8
E
1890 WEC VAN GOGH
IMO 9246566
868 TEU 2004
21.9
E
1891 AMELIE BORCHARD
IMO 9242560
868 TEU 2002
21.9
E
1892 WEC MONDRIAAN
IMO 9354363
868 TEU 2006
21.9
E
1893 AVILA
IMO 9295529
887 TEU 2007
21.9
E
1894 VERA A
IMO 9372585
1,000 TEU 2011
21.9
E
1895 SPICA J
IMO 9355460
962 TEU 2007
22.0
E
1896 MSC SAGITTARIUS F
IMO 9491616
957 TEU 2012
22.0
E
1897 MED IZMIR
IMO 9143879
951 TEU 1998
22.0
E
1898 SC POTOMAC
IMO 9236274
1,155 TEU 2002
22.1
E
1899 AILA
IMO 9354337
908 TEU 2007
22.1
E
1900 KANTATA
IMO 9327580
1,118 TEU 2006
22.1
E
Page 38 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.