Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#348 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
6.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-53% greener
A

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 223 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

45
Q4
39
'27 Q1
40
'27 Q2
34
'27 Q3
32
'27 Q4
30
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 648 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
301 BBC URANUS
IMO 9947768
40,297 2022
6.2
A
302 V TAURUS
IMO 9496161
33,193 2010
6.2
A
303 LADY SERRA
IMO 9449883
30,124 2010
6.2
A
304 IRON LADY
IMO 9385099
32,283 2009
6.2
A
306 SAGA VIKING
IMO 9233466
46,901 2002
6.2
A
305 REESTBORG
IMO 9592563
23,317 2013
6.2
A
308 BERGE ANNUPURI
IMO 9713193
34,536 2016
6.2
A
307 21 HONOR
IMO 9495363
37,155 2012
6.2
A
309 NORDIC MALMOE
IMO 9602679
35,843 2012
6.2
A
310 SWORD LION
IMO 9136785
27,919 1996
6.2
A
312 ACACIA
IMO 9597642
33,677 2008
6.2
A
311 UBC SALAVERRY
IMO 9426881
33,305 2010
6.2
A
314 FU HAI
IMO 9766657
31,777 2016
6.3
A
313 PATRIA
IMO 9580053
32,069 2014
6.3
A
315 HANA H
IMO 9143855
8,104 1998
6.3
A
317 MELOI
IMO 9392119
33,355 2009
6.3
A
316 ATHENA SAN
IMO 9623659
38,503 2011
6.3
A
318 SEA FAITH
IMO 9655420
33,343 2014
6.3
A
319 V LYRA
IMO 9539444
33,628 2012
6.3
A
320 ECO MONEGASQUE
IMO 9701011
33,190 2013
6.3
A
322 TIAN XI
IMO 9704764
38,098 2016
6.3
A
321 ZIMRIDA
IMO 9380817
37,296 2008
6.3
A
324 TIAN LE
IMO 9722730
37,994 2016
6.4
A
323 ARIANDA
IMO 9537276
37,495 2010
6.4
A
325 AMELIE
IMO 9647289
34,650 2013
6.4
A
326 COOL BREEZE
IMO 9400930
32,283 2010
6.4
A
327 LADY ZEHRA
IMO 9309617
31,734 2006
6.4
A
329 ECO NEMESIS
IMO 9711913
33,375 2015
6.4
A
328 SATURN J
IMO 9546174
33,478 2010
6.4
A
330 TAN BINH 299
IMO 9459149
33,132 2011
6.4
A
331 ERNA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9717670
38,613 2016
6.4
A
332 UBC TAMPA
IMO 9416707
37,724 2009
6.4
A
333 SHAMAN WISDOM
IMO 9563407
35,052 2010
6.4
A
335 SSI MERAL HANIM
IMO 9491678
37,238 2011
6.4
A
334 GRAIN WAY
IMO 9545560
23,000 2009
6.4
A
337 CORINTHIAN SPIRE
IMO 9478482
32,154 2009
6.5
A
336 K BEREKET
IMO 9370408
33,225 2008
6.5
A
338 KAMENARI
IMO 9400942
32,326 2010
6.5
A
339 BC LARA
IMO 9598024
38,494 2011
6.5
A
340 EKATERINA
IMO 9641807
38,182 2013
6.5
A
341 V CETUS
IMO 9370381
33,401 2008
6.5
A
342 IWAMI
IMO 9414981
20,142 2009
6.5
A
343 PLUTO
IMO 9432531
32,092 2014
6.5
A
347 FIRST BROTHER
IMO 9266140
32,385 2003
6.5
A
346 AMIRA MARYANA
IMO 9379650
32,029 2007
6.5
A
345 NORDIC OSLO
IMO 9626601
35,866 2012
6.5
A
344 KERASIA S
IMO 9496185
33,170 2011
6.5
A
350 NOVI
IMO 9424120
34,044 2011
6.6
A
349 GLOBAL ARSENAL
IMO 9363302
32,313 2008
6.6
A
348 SIROCO
IMO 9317705
37,534 2006
6.6
A
Page 7 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.