Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#834 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-23% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 286 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
59
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
44
'27 Q4
69
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2
36
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,283 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,064 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

394
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,537M
capex range, top measure per vessel (394 of 394 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
802 ELANDRA BAY
IMO 9821691
115,674 2018
3.8
C
801 OLIB
IMO 9334739
108,433 2009
3.8
C
803 NOVO
IMO 9633446
162,029 2010
3.8
C
804 ZOUZOU N.
IMO 9410222
162,204 2010
3.9
C
805 STI SPIGA
IMO 9708148
109,999 2015
3.9
C
806 GALWAY SPIRIT
IMO 9312858
105,559 2007
3.9
C
808 SANMAR SONATINA
IMO 9409479
74,997 2008
3.9
C
807 NEW ABILITY
IMO 9361512
105,381 2008
3.9
C
812 PROTEUS TRACY
IMO 9923449
109,999 2023
3.9
C
811 ARISTARCHOS
IMO 9788394
79,905 2015
3.9
C
810 ALICANTE
IMO 9527855
115,707 2008
3.9
C
809 FRONT OCELOT
IMO 9726580
109,900 2016
3.9
C
813 AGIOS GERASIMOS
IMO 9693056
109,999 2013
3.9
C
814 EPICURUS
IMO 9737096
79,945 2017
3.9
C
816 MINERVA OLYMPIA
IMO 9787194
114,780 2015
3.9
C
815 HAFNIA KALLANG
IMO 9766190
74,189 2017
3.9
C
819 BAKER SPIRIT
IMO 9408073
156,928 2009
3.9
C
818 SEBAROK SPIRIT
IMO 9572264
109,554 2008
3.9
C
817 ALEXANDER
IMO 9826720
113,170 2017
3.9
C
820 GUANYIN
IMO 9299707
109,857 2005
3.9
C
821 ABU DHABI-III
IMO 9489027
105,131 2011
3.9
C
822 MINERVA GLORIA
IMO 9382750
115,873 2009
3.9
C
824 JAG LARA
IMO 9488023
105,258 2012
3.9
C
823 MINERVA ARIES
IMO 9412177
105,483 2006
3.9
C
826 ALMI VOYAGER
IMO 9579585
157,638 2014
3.9
C
825 DUBAI CHARM
IMO 9402495
115,514 2006
3.9
C
829 PRIMERO
IMO 9741815
106,329 2016
3.9
C
833 NEMO
IMO 9313498
105,804 2008
3.9
C
828 SINBAD
IMO 9413688
115,928 2009
3.9
C
827 HAI SHANG
IMO 9792852
109,900 2018
3.9
C
832 JOSE DO PATROCINIO
IMO 9453860
157,055 2007
3.9
C
831 MARETA
IMO 9537927
115,795 2008
3.9
C
830 LISBOA
IMO 9765158
155,723 2017
3.9
C
834 SUEZ ENCHANTED
IMO 9318084
159,233 2007
3.9
C
835 STI LOMBARD
IMO 9708150
109,999 2015
3.9
C
838 SEALEO
IMO 9473066
107,505 2012
3.9
C
837 NEAPOLIS
IMO 9792199
73,937 2018
3.9
C
836 LANCING
IMO 9792046
104,074 2018
3.9
C
848 DOLPHIN PEARL
IMO 9402237
114,824 2006
4.0
C
843 NISSOS PAROS
IMO 9592290
115,722 2010
4.0
C
842 SFL TIGER
IMO 9664809
121,225 2012
4.0
C
847 ADAM
IMO 9826732
113,226 2018
4.0
C
846 NAVIG8 PRESTIGE JKB
IMO 9831309
111,000 2015
4.0
C
845 DUBAI ATTRACTION
IMO 9422536
115,459 2011
4.0
C
844 ALFRED
IMO 9826897
113,159 2018
4.0
C
841 CALIDA
IMO 9522128
115,812 2008
4.0
C
840 PACIFIC RAWAN
IMO 9772022
109,999 2017
4.0
C
839 NORTH SEA
IMO 9760495
106,340 2016
4.0
C
850 IONIC ANASSA
IMO 9779795
114,718 2014
4.0
C
849 NAMRATA
IMO 9401154
105,830 2008
4.0
C
Page 17 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.