Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,050 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-10% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1001 SOUSTA
IMO 9384992
106,045 2007
4.4
C
1002 P. SOPHIA
IMO 9414034
105,071 2006
4.4
C
1003 MINERVA SOPHIA
IMO 9382762
115,748 2009
4.4
C
1004 BRIOLETTE
IMO 9524982
104,588 2011
4.4
C
1005 HIGH MARINER
IMO 9812755
51,492 2017
4.4
C
1006 OKEE JOHN T
IMO 9311036
53,712 2006
4.4
C
1007 CLEAROCEAN GINKGO
IMO 9916604
50,000 2020
4.4
C
1008 MYRTOS
IMO 9389100
106,969 2009
4.4
C
1009 STI ROSE
IMO 9696682
109,999 2015
4.4
C
1010 EAGLE KANGAR
IMO 9417024
107,481 2010
4.4
C
1011 KMARIN REGARD
IMO 9683063
109,543 2016
4.4
C
1012 CIELO DI HOUSTON
IMO 9791860
74,999 2019
4.4
C
1013 ROWAN
IMO 9291262
114,834 2005
4.4
C
1014 BANI YAS
IMO 9487249
74,913 2010
4.4
C
1015 SEA STAR
IMO 9607710
112,147 2010
4.4
C
1016 OCEAN PHOENIX
IMO 9388728
108,941 2007
4.5
C
1017 NEW LIBERTY
IMO 9411082
164,028 2010
4.5
C
1018 DUCHESS OF DORIA
IMO 9403346
53,603 2009
4.5
C
1019 SEAOATH
IMO 9290361
105,472 2003
4.5
C
1020 SOLOMON SEA
IMO 9760500
106,359 2016
4.5
C
1021 ALTERA WAVE
IMO 9863558
103,158 2021
4.5
C
1022 SAETTA
IMO 9384069
107,023 2009
4.5
C
1023 KMARIN RESOURCE
IMO 9683037
109,483 2016
4.5
C
1024 ADVANTAGE SPRING
IMO 9466582
156,596 2010
4.5
C
1025 ARCHANGEL
IMO 9302592
163,216 2006
4.5
C
1026 MINERVA KALLISTO
IMO 9853008
113,000 2016
4.5
C
1027 MAERSK TOKYO
IMO 9718076
50,000 2013
4.5
C
1028 AEGEAN NOBILITY
IMO 9345441
115,814 2007
4.5
C
1029 TORM GWYNETH
IMO 9429003
119,456 2010
4.5
C
1030 STI CONDOTTI
IMO 9690810
109,999 2013
4.5
C
1031 MAERSK CORSICA
IMO 9786188
49,919 2019
4.5
C
1032 HAFNIA LYNX
IMO 9635808
49,999 2013
4.5
C
1033 MINERVA ALICE
IMO 9309435
114,850 2006
4.5
C
1034 DAYTONA
IMO 9528043
115,896 2008
4.5
C
1035 CONQUEST
IMO 9308089
73,917 2006
4.5
C
1036 BUDDHA
IMO 9283306
109,637 2004
4.5
C
1037 ANDEAN SUN
IMO 9911525
49,999 2022
4.5
C
1038 CL XUNYANG
IMO 9718088
50,000 2013
4.5
C
1039 COROSSOL
IMO 9395331
106,898 2006
4.6
C
1040 HAFNIA EXPERIENCE
IMO 9735610
74,669 2016
4.6
C
1041 ORIENT INNOVATION
IMO 9793387
49,997 2017
4.6
C
1042 STI SLOANE
IMO 9690808
114,000 2013
4.6
C
1043 HELLAS MARIANNA
IMO 9798076
49,850 2018
4.6
C
1044 PGC COMPANION
IMO 9282625
72,825 2005
4.6
C
1045 ALFA ALANDIA
IMO 9752797
106,324 2016
4.6
C
1046 HELLAS AVATAR
IMO 9722613
49,997 2015
4.6
C
1047 MAERSK CAPRI
IMO 9786140
49,919 2018
4.6
C
1048 MINERVA NOUNOU
IMO 9309423
114,850 2006
4.6
C
1049 BLUEBIRD
IMO 9737515
74,074 2016
4.6
C
1050 DIYYINAH - I
IMO 9487251
74,954 2011
4.6
C
Page 21 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.