Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,400 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
9.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+1% higher
D
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1351 MSC RADIANT III
IMO 9235402
2,456 TEU 2001
9.5
D
1352 MSC KIM
IMO 9351581
4,254 TEU 2008
9.5
D
1353 MSC MONTEREY V
IMO 9349796
4,860 TEU 2007
9.5
D
1354 MSC CORUNA
IMO 9480215
5,550 TEU 2011
9.5
D
1355 MAERSK PUELO
IMO 9306172
6,539 TEU 2006
9.5
D
1356 JPO LIBRA
IMO 9297840
4,132 TEU 2005
9.5
D
1357 ZIM ATLANTIC
IMO 9440801
4,300 TEU 2009
9.5
D
1358 DERBY D
IMO 9278117
4,253 TEU 2004
9.6
D
1359 MAERSK JABAL
IMO 9343077
2,824 TEU 2008
9.6
D
1360 VENTO DI MAESTRALE
IMO 9985021
24,457 2024
9.6
D
1361 MSC CADIZ
IMO 9480203
5,550 TEU 2011
9.6
D
1362 MAERSK NARMADA
IMO 9356098
2,478 TEU 2008
9.6
D
1363 MSC KILIMANJARO IV
IMO 9318175
3,853 TEU 2006
9.6
D
1364 MAERSK DENVER
IMO 9332999
6,188 TEU 2007
9.6
D
1365 NAVIOS AZURE
IMO 9324851
4,250 TEU 2007
9.6
D
1366 CMA CGM OSAKA
IMO 9400291
4,506 TEU 2008
9.6
D
1367 CAPE CORFU
IMO 9857432
2,700 TEU 2021
9.6
D
1368 MSC GIANNA III
IMO 9152856
2,517 TEU 1998
9.7
D
1369 CMA CGM MALTA
IMO 9301433
2,556 TEU 2004
9.7
D
1370 CMA CGM SALAMANQUE
IMO 9961348
2,000 TEU 2024
9.7
D
1371 JOLLY CLIVIA
IMO 9444417
4,300 TEU 2007
9.7
D
1372 MSC CORNELIA
IMO 9426817
5,083 TEU 2010
9.7
D
1373 MAERSK BROWNSVILLE
IMO 9313955
4,196 TEU 2007
9.7
D
1374 LICA MAERSK
IMO 9190779
3,700 TEU 2001
9.7
D
1375 SINE A
IMO 9343089
2,824 TEU 2008
9.7
D
1376 SEASPAN LIMA
IMO 9386005
1,345 TEU 2008
9.7
D
1377 SM SEOUL
IMO 9456953
4,300 TEU 2010
9.7
D
1378 MSC GRENADA III
IMO 9275373
2,246 TEU 2003
9.7
D
1379 EMMA A
IMO 9308194
2,800 TEU 2007
9.7
D
1380 MSC VIGO
IMO 9480227
5,550 TEU 2012
9.8
D
1381 SPIRIT OF SINGAPORE
IMO 9362396
3,630 TEU 2007
9.8
D
1382 NORDMAAS
IMO 9822736
1,800 TEU 2019
9.8
D
1383 MSC ALIX 3
IMO 9166651
2,452 TEU 1998
9.8
D
1384 OOCL MONTREAL
IMO 9253739
4,402 TEU 2003
9.8
D
1385 CMA CGM CEBU
IMO 9362736
1,795 TEU 2008
9.8
D
1386 VENTO DI BORA
IMO 9950064
1,900 TEU 2023
9.8
D
1387 ATLANTIC SUN
IMO 9670614
3,817 TEU 2017
9.9
D
1388 ALGECIRAS EXPRESS
IMO 9227015
4,253 TEU 2002
9.9
D
1389 MSC ENGLAND
IMO 9232890
4,132 TEU 2001
9.9
D
1390 MSC EAGLE III
IMO 9302449
2,478 TEU 2004
9.9
D
1391 BALTIMORE STAR
IMO 9440796
4,300 TEU 2009
9.9
D
1392 PEPI STAR
IMO 9971020
1,800 TEU 2024
9.9
D
1393 RITA
IMO 9301988
2,785 TEU 2007
9.9
D
1394 CAPE SPENCER
IMO 9950129
2,713 TEU 2023
9.9
D
1395 MSC ARUSHI R.
IMO 9244881
4,112 TEU 2002
9.9
D
1396 MOL EXPERIENCE
IMO 9333838
4,803 TEU 2007
9.9
D
1397 AS PETRONIA
IMO 9286786
2,556 TEU 2004
9.9
D
1398 MSC MILA 3
IMO 9062996
2,100 TEU 1995
9.9
D
1399 NORDAMELIA
IMO 9724958
2,500 TEU 2017
9.9
D
1400 SPIRIT OF SYDNEY
IMO 9391672
3,630 TEU 2007
9.9
D
Page 28 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.