Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#289 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-46% greener
A

CII band distribution

552 at D/E
A 412B 557C 554D 355E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 268 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

39
Q3
49
Q4
65
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
40
'27 Q4
48
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,872 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,753 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,191 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,157 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 886 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 776 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

388
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,607–3,828M
capex range, top measure per vessel (388 of 388 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
255 KRITI ENERGY
IMO 9935636
156,740 2022
2.6
A
254 KAREKARE
IMO 9787986
159,638 2017
2.6
A
253 FRONT SANTIAGO
IMO 9831842
157,270 2019
2.6
A
252 CRUDE ZEPHYRUS
IMO 9899375
156,828 2021
2.6
A
251 MARAN ORPHEUS
IMO 9868168
157,946 2020
2.6
A
256 EXPLORER
IMO 9312133
163,759 2006
2.6
A
257 LOIRE
IMO 9761516
157,463 2016
2.6
A
258 YUAN BEI HAI
IMO 9843352
158,840 2021
2.6
A
259 SEAVISION
IMO 9790971
158,480 2018
2.6
A
260 NORDIC HUNTER
IMO 9921075
157,037 2022
2.6
A
263 MARLIN SICILY
IMO 9835848
156,563 2017
2.6
A
262 TOKYO SPIRIT
IMO 9296377
149,996 2006
2.6
A
261 TAHOE SPIRIT
IMO 9427641
156,870 2010
2.6
A
266 SONANGOL RANGEL
IMO 9575541
157,755 2011
2.7
A
265 FRONT SINGAPORE
IMO 9832248
158,006 2019
2.7
A
264 SONANGOL PORTO AMBOIM
IMO 9575577
157,638 2012
2.7
A
267 BALTIC LOYALTY
IMO 9411953
317,441 2010
2.7
A
268 SEAGRACE
IMO 9934826
157,746 2022
2.7
A
270 MONTE URQUIOLA
IMO 9803273
156,331 2019
2.7
A
269 EVA MAERSK
IMO 9682992
158,468 2017
2.7
A
271 FRONT SILKEBORG
IMO 9832274
158,006 2019
2.7
A
273 MARAN HELIOS
IMO 9761358
156,458 2017
2.7
A
272 DELTA OCEAN
IMO 9408475
157,444 2010
2.7
A
276 VADELA
IMO 9996408
159,220 2024
2.7
A
275 DHT EUROPE
IMO 9315159
317,713 2007
2.7
A
274 ELANDRA FALCON
IMO 9792486
157,553 2017
2.7
A
277 NISSOS SIFNOS
IMO 9884045
157,447 2020
2.7
A
278 FRONT CRYSTAL
IMO 9743186
157,409 2017
2.7
A
281 NISSOS ANTIMILOS
IMO 9895226
157,447 2021
2.7
A
280 MARLIN SOMERSET
IMO 9835850
156,620 2017
2.7
A
279 SAMOS
IMO 9772345
156,978 2018
2.7
A
282 ALDANA
IMO 9809368
156,670 2018
2.7
A
284 FRONT SUEZ
IMO 9831830
157,270 2017
2.7
A
283 BRISTOL
IMO 9941879
157,077 2024
2.7
A
286 NORDIC SPACE
IMO 9748681
157,587 2017
2.7
A
285 STENA SUNRISE
IMO 9592214
158,886 2013
2.7
A
287 MARAN HERMES
IMO 9761346
156,458 2017
2.7
A
288 SPYROS
IMO 9877171
158,081 2020
2.7
A
289 SPEEDWAY
IMO 9749506
158,594 2017
2.7
A
292 ATLANTIC LOYALTY
IMO 9312509
307,284 2007
2.7
A
291 OTIS
IMO 9408217
156,719 2010
2.7
A
290 EAGLE SAN DIEGO
IMO 9594834
157,849 2012
2.7
A
294 CARIBBEAN LOYALTY
IMO 9501150
316,373 2011
2.7
A
293 OTTOMAN COURTESY
IMO 9788708
152,544 2017
2.7
A
300 SOUNION
IMO 9312145
163,759 2006
2.7
A
299 YUAN DONG HAI
IMO 9843338
158,677 2020
2.7
A
298 PLATA GLORY
IMO 9384590
297,974 2009
2.7
A
297 AMALIA M
IMO 9924003
157,010 2022
2.7
A
296 DELTA EURYDICE
IMO 9700706
157,031 2015
2.7
A
295 MONTE UDALA
IMO 9785823
156,341 2018
2.7
A
Page 6 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.