Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,368 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
10.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
+2% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 552 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q4
101
'27 Q1
72
'27 Q2
77
'27 Q3
95
'27 Q4
118
'28 Q1
105
'28 Q2
94
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1351 HUTTON
IMO 9311787
2,742 TEU 2006
10.6
D
1352 NAVIOS DORADO
IMO 9431707
4,253 TEU 2010
10.6
D
1353 JOLLY CLIVIA
IMO 9444417
4,400 TEU 2010
10.6
D
1354 HYUNDAI HONGKONG
IMO 9305661
6,800 TEU 2006
10.6
D
1355 CMA CGM QUELIMANE
IMO 9367839
2,564 TEU 2009
10.6
D
1356 MSC ELOISE
IMO 8917778
2,598 TEU 1991
10.6
D
1357 STADT DRESDEN
IMO 9320049
2,700 TEU 2004
10.6
D
1358 AS CHRISTIANA
IMO 9311799
2,742 TEU 2006
10.6
D
1359 AS CONSTANTINA
IMO 9308390
2,741 TEU 2003
10.6
D
1360 NAVIOS AZURE
IMO 9324851
4,250 TEU 2007
10.6
D
1361 MSC NAISHA III
IMO 9307839
2,524 TEU 2005
10.6
D
1362 MAERSK NADI
IMO 9386017
2,500 TEU 2008
10.6
D
1363 AITOLIKOS
IMO 9386483
4,300 TEU 2009
10.6
D
1364 AS ANNE
IMO 9700251
2,190 TEU 2016
10.6
D
1365 CORELLI
IMO 9126766
1,119 TEU 1996
10.6
D
1366 AMALTHEA
IMO 9397913
4,178 TEU 2009
10.6
D
1367 ZHONG GU DONG HAI
IMO 9842322
1,908 TEU 2019
10.6
D
1368 BRUSSELS
IMO 9200691
5,618 TEU 2000
10.6
D
1369 MSC GRENADA III
IMO 9275373
2,246 TEU 2003
10.6
D
1370 LORI
IMO 9631125
3,610 TEU 2013
10.7
D
1371 MSC ZLATA R.
IMO 9227314
4,112 TEU 2002
10.7
D
1372 CMA CGM ABU DHABI
IMO 9802499
2,506 TEU 2018
10.7
D
1373 SC MONTREUX
IMO 9295414
4,132 TEU 2005
10.7
D
1374 NAVIOS VERMILION
IMO 9324837
4,250 TEU 2007
10.7
D
1375 MAIRA
IMO 9203502
2,506 TEU 2000
10.7
D
1376 NAVIOS INDIGO
IMO 9324875
4,250 TEU 2008
10.7
D
1377 MAERSK AVON
IMO 9164275
1,092 TEU 1999
10.7
D
1378 GREEN HOPE
IMO 9629160
1,700 TEU 2014
10.7
D
1379 MARY SCHULTE
IMO 9694414
2,339 TEU 2015
10.7
D
1380 ROZA A
IMO 9126742
1,119 TEU 1996
10.7
D
1381 SASKIA A
IMO 9315927
2,824 TEU 2007
10.7
D
1382 DELPHIS BOTHNIA
IMO 9763710
1,924 TEU 2016
10.7
D
1383 JPO PISCES
IMO 9297852
4,132 TEU 2005
10.8
D
1384 MSC SPRING III
IMO 9316359
2,732 TEU 2006
10.8
D
1385 ARIANA A
IMO 9320142
2,702 TEU 2005
10.8
D
1386 MSC CAPRI
IMO 9154220
2,460 TEU 1998
10.8
D
1387 ECO MAESTRO
IMO 9985942
13,675 2024
10.8
D
1388 CAPE ALTIUS
IMO 9848730
2,700 TEU 2020
10.8
D
1389 CAPE CITIUS
IMO 9848742
2,708 TEU 2021
10.8
D
1390 OOCL GUANGZHOU
IMO 9404869
4,578 TEU 2006
10.8
D
1391 MSC JENNY II
IMO 9000742
2,045 TEU 1995
10.8
D
1392 SIARGAO
IMO 9944742
1,781 TEU 2023
10.8
D
1393 MSC VAISHNAVI R.
IMO 9227340
4,112 TEU 2002
10.8
D
1394 MSC NISHA V
IMO 9326768
4,298 TEU 2006
10.8
D
1395 GSL MYNY
IMO 9213583
5,762 TEU 2000
10.9
D
1396 VIVIEN A
IMO 9491848
2,478 TEU 2007
10.9
D
1397 MSC MADISON II
IMO 9231119
1,842 TEU 2002
10.9
D
1398 WADI ALRAYAN
IMO 9208875
3,011 TEU 2000
10.9
D
1399 ALGECIRAS EXPRESS
IMO 9227015
4,253 TEU 2002
10.9
D
1400 CMA CGM ALIAGA
IMO 9323039
3,586 TEU 2008
10.9
D
Page 28 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.