Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,008 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
8.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-21% greener
C
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1001 MSC LEIGH
IMO 9320439
4,860 TEU 2006
8.2
C
1002 MSC ALICANTE
IMO 9480174
5,550 TEU 2011
8.2
C
1003 SANTA CLARA
IMO 9444716
7,090 TEU 2010
8.2
C
1004 CMA CGM FIDELIO
IMO 9299642
9,809 TEU 2006
8.2
C
1005 LE HAVRE
IMO 9307243
9,572 TEU 2006
8.2
C
1006 VUOKSI MAERSK
IMO 9775775
3,600 TEU 2018
8.2
C
1007 SANTA RITA
IMO 9425382
7,114 TEU 2011
8.2
C
1008 MSC INGRID
IMO 9181651
4,500 TEU 1999
8.2
C
1009 MAERSK HARTFORD
IMO 9333008
6,200 TEU 2007
8.2
C
1010 MSC HIMANSHI
IMO 9127540
2,006 TEU 1997
8.2
C
1011 W KITHIRA
IMO 9215323
6,802 TEU 2001
8.3
C
1012 VICENTE PINZON
IMO 9625396
4,800 TEU 2014
8.3
C
1013 DELPHINUS C
IMO 9337652
4,888 TEU 2007
8.3
C
1014 SPIRIT OF HONG KONG
IMO 9456953
4,300 TEU 2010
8.3
C
1015 XIN XIA MEN
IMO 9270476
5,668 TEU 2004
8.3
C
1016 CMA CGM VOLTAIRE
IMO 9635652
6,900 TEU 2013
8.3
C
1017 NYK DAEDALUS
IMO 9337614
4,888 TEU 2007
8.3
C
1018 MSC FREEPORT
IMO 9301330
5,060 TEU 2006
8.3
C
1019 MSC DYMPHNA
IMO 9110391
5,711 TEU 1996
8.3
C
1020 CMA CGM SYDNEY
IMO 9315953
4,300 TEU 2007
8.3
C
1021 NYK ROMULUS
IMO 9416989
4,888 TEU 2010
8.3
C
1022 JOLLY ARGENTO
IMO 9467043
4,600 TEU 2010
8.3
C
1023 MSC YUXIN
IMO 9966946
1,800 TEU 2024
8.3
C
1024 PANDA 009
IMO 9294812
5,527 TEU 2006
8.4
C
1025 NICARAGUA EXPRESS
IMO 9635676
6,900 TEU 2013
8.4
C
1026 IRENES RESPECT
IMO 9964144
2,824 TEU 2024
8.4
C
1027 MSC NEDERLAND III
IMO 8918954
2,668 TEU 1992
8.4
C
1028 MAERSK SYDNEY
IMO 9289958
7,500 TEU 2005
8.4
C
1029 GABRIEL A
IMO 9300659
1,676 TEU 2004
8.4
C
1030 MAERSK CHICAGO
IMO 9332975
6,188 TEU 2007
8.4
C
1031 MAERSK NEWPORT
IMO 9356127
2,478 TEU 2005
8.4
C
1032 LODUR
IMO 9219381
3,100 TEU 2003
8.4
C
1033 SPIRIT OF SYDNEY
IMO 9391672
3,630 TEU 2007
8.4
C
1034 LORRAINE
IMO 9311763
2,742 TEU 2006
8.4
C
1035 MAERSK KENTUCKY
IMO 9193240
4,300 TEU 1998
8.4
C
1036 ZIM SHANGHAI
IMO 9305570
9,383 TEU 2006
8.4
C
1037 MAERSK SENTOSA
IMO 9315202
5,648 TEU 2007
8.4
C
1038 SEOUL EXPRESS
IMO 9193305
4,843 TEU 2000
8.4
C
1039 MSC QINGDAO
IMO 9256470
7,731 TEU 2004
8.4
C
1040 VOLGA MAERSK
IMO 9775749
3,600 TEU 2018
8.4
C
1041 CMA CGM VERDI
IMO 9331165
5,527 TEU 2008
8.4
C
1042 TOKYO EXPRESS
IMO 9193290
4,843 TEU 2000
8.4
C
1043 DACHAN BAY EXPRESS
IMO 9539664
4,620 TEU 2012
8.4
C
1044 MSC PRATITI
IMO 9280861
4,992 TEU 2004
8.4
C
1045 PANDA 008
IMO 9248162
5,752 TEU 2003
8.4
C
1046 CYPRESS
IMO 9461477
8,600 TEU 2011
8.4
C
1047 MSC CADIZ
IMO 9480203
5,550 TEU 2011
8.5
C
1048 INDEPENDENT PRIMERO
IMO 9298636
3,091 TEU 2005
8.5
C
1049 LAUST MAERSK
IMO 9190743
4,045 TEU 2001
8.5
C
1050 MSC AQUARIUS
IMO 9262704
6,492 TEU 2003
8.5
C
Page 21 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.