Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)

#422 of 2,098 container ships

CO₂ intensity

5.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm

vs segment average (10.38)

-45% greener

Bulk Carrier Container Ship Oil Tanker Chemical Tanker Gas Carrier LNG Carrier General Cargo Vehicle Carrier Refrigerated Cargo Ro-Ro Cargo

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E

A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

'27 Q1

'27 Q2

'27 Q3

'27 Q4

112

'28 Q1

'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

Measure	Eligible	CO₂ reduction	Capex band	Payback	Confidence
Turbocharger cut-out	1,485	1–3%	€80k–250k	—	vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement	1,440	5–10%	€400k–1,200k	—	vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling	1,344	2–6%	€300k–900k	—	vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion	965	5–15%	€8,000k–20,000k	—	vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion	795	15–25%	€15,000k–35,000k	—	vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO	360	3–6%	€500–1,500/kW	—	vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624

D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure

€3,295–7,790M

capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)

1.48–2.63 Mt

annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

Vessel	Band	Age	Drop year	Req. reduction 2030	Dock window
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k	E	16y	2026	78%	Jan 2028
SEPELU · <25k	E	26y	2026	69%	Aug 2028
MSC SABRINA III · <25k	E	37y	2026	61%	Mar 2027
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k	E	18y	2026	59%	Mar 2028
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k	E	21y	2026	55%	Feb 2027

See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

Sort 🌱 Greenest first 🔧 Least efficient first — retrofit candidates

Size (TEU)

All sizes < 3,000 TEU 3k – 8k TEU 8k – 14k TEU > 14,000 TEU

Year

2025 2024

2,076

vessels ranked

2.25

greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)

8.4

segment median

#	Vessel	Size (TEU)	Built	Length	Main Engine	Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm)	Grade
402	MSC SONIA IMO 9404663	13,200 TEU	2010	366 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.6	A
401	MSC ARICA IMO 9619452	8,762 TEU	2012	299 m	Hyundai - 9S90ME-C8	5.6	A
404	MSC PANTERA IMO 9975557	101,078	2024	272 m	MAN-B&W 6G80ME-C10-GI	5.6	A
403	MSC AURORA IMO 9484481	13,050 TEU	2012	366 m	Doosan - 12K98MC-C	5.6	A
405	COSCO SHIPPING HIMALAYAS IMO 9757840	13,636 TEU	2017	366 m	CSSC - 10S90ME-C10	5.6	A
406	EVER FOREVER IMO 9850575	11,000 TEU	2020	334 m	Wärtsilä - 9X92	5.6	A
407	APL SAVANNAH IMO 9597513	9,200 TEU	2010	328 m	Doosan - DOOSAN-MAN 10S90ME-C9.2	5.6	A
408	VUNG TAU EXPRESS IMO 9767998	10,100 TEU	2018	336 m	CSSC - 10S90ME-C9	5.6	B
409	MSC AINO IMO 9770751	8,800 TEU	2019	328 m	Doosan - 9S90ME-C10	5.6	B
412	ONE MUNCHEN IMO 9706750	13,870 TEU	2015	366 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.7	B
411	MSC DANIT IMO 9404649	13,200 TEU	2009	366 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.7	B
410	OOCL BREMERHAVEN IMO 9979254	5,920 TEU	2024	255 m	MAN-B&W 6G80ME-C10	5.7	B
413	MSC PERLE IMO 9503732	13,092 TEU	2013	366 m	Wärtsilä - 12RT-flex96C	5.7	B
415	COSCO SHIPPING ANDES IMO 9757888	13,636 TEU	2018	366 m	CSSC - 10S90ME-C10	5.7	B
414	COSCO GLORY IMO 9466245	13,092 TEU	2011	366 m	MAN - 12K98ME-C	5.7	B
416	MSC DEILA IMO 9461415	14,000 TEU	2012	366 m	Doosan - 12K98MC-C	5.7	B
417	MSC TOKYO IMO 9318046	8,204 TEU	2006	334 m	MAN - 12K98MC	5.7	B
418	SCI DELHI IMO 9699127	9,034 TEU	2014	300 m	Wärtsilä - 9X82	5.7	B
419	CMA CGM APOLLON IMO 9882516	15,000 TEU	2022	366 m	Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd - South Korea 10X92-LPSCR	5.7	B
420	MSC PINA IMO 9339272	9,200 TEU	2007	337 m	Doosan - 12K98MC-C	5.7	B
421	TAMPA TRIUMPH IMO 9737462	13,870 TEU	2017	366 m	STX - 11S90ME-C10.5	5.7	B
422	MSC LUCY IMO 9289104	8,034 TEU	2005	325 m	Sulzer - 12RTA96C	5.7	B
424	XIN LOS ANGELES IMO 9307217	9,572 TEU	2006	337 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.7	B
423	MSC DAKAR X IMO 9605231	9,400 TEU	2013	300 m	Hyundai - 9S90ME-C9	5.7	B
426	APL FULLERTON IMO 9632026	13,892 TEU	2014	398 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.7	B
425	MSC NAIROBI X IMO 9605243	9,400 TEU	2013	300 m	Hyundai - 9S90ME-C9	5.7	B
427	MAERSK SERANGOON IMO 9315214	5,648 TEU	2007	318 m	Wärtsilä - 11RT-flex96C	5.7	B
428	MSC CARLOTTA IMO 9756731	9,962 TEU	2017	314 m	Doosan - 9S90ME-C10	5.8	B
429	CMA CGM T. ROOSEVELT IMO 9780873	14,414 TEU	2017	366 m	Hyundai - 10X92	5.8	B
430	MSC LIVORNO IMO 9461427	14,000 TEU	2010	366 m	Doosan - 12K98MC-C	5.8	B
431	CMA CGM AMERIGO VESPUCCI IMO 9454395	13,344 TEU	2010	366 m	Hyundai - 14RT-flex96C	5.8	B
432	KIEL EXPRESS IMO 9229855	7,179 TEU	2003	321 m	MAN - 12K98MC	5.8	B
435	OAKLAND EXPRESS IMO 9667174	13,800 TEU	2014	368 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.8	B
434	CMA CGM VASCO DE GAMA IMO 9706889	17,859 TEU	2015	399 m	CSSC - 11S90ME-C9	5.8	B
433	COSCO INDONESIA IMO 9448786	8,500 TEU	2010	334 m	MAN - 11K98ME	5.8	B
436	APL PHOENIX IMO 9597501	9,200 TEU	2013	328 m	Doosan - 10S90ME-C MK9.2 TIER 2	5.8	B
437	EA CHARA IMO 9967483	7,092 TEU	2021	272 m	CSSC-MES Diesel Co Ltd - China 7G80ME-C10-HPSCR	5.8	B
438	MSC ALEXANDRA IMO 9461374	14,000 TEU	2010	366 m	Doosan - 12K98MC-C	5.8	B
439	MSC CAPELLA IMO 9465289	13,100 TEU	2012	366 m	MAN - 12K98ME7	5.8	B
440	ESTELLE MAERSK IMO 9321495	11,000 TEU	2006	398 m	Doosan - DOOSAN-SULZER 14RT-FLEX96C	5.8	B
443	MSC INES IMO 9305714	9,100 TEU	2006	348 m	MAN - 12K98ME	5.8	B
442	MSC MOMBASA IMO 9967275	8,002 TEU	2024	272 m	6G80ME-C10-HPSCR	5.8	B
441	MSC SAO PAULO V IMO 9147071	4,688 TEU	1998	294 m	Hyundai - 9 K 90 MC-C	5.8	B
445	DORTMUND EXPRESS IMO 9461051	13,000 TEU	2012	367 m	MAN - 11K98ME	5.8	B
444	CAPE TAINARO IMO 9706205	11,000 TEU	2017	330 m	Hyundai - 8G95ME-C9	5.8	B
447	ZIM EAGLE IMO 9960502	5,300 TEU	2024	238 m	MAN-B&W 6G80ME-C10	5.9	B
446	MSC SUSANNA IMO 9290543	9,200 TEU	2005	337 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	5.9	B
450	ATLANTA EXPRESS IMO 9667162	13,800 TEU	2014	368 m	MAN - 11S90ME-C9	5.9	B
449	MSC YOKOHAMA IMO 9285665	7,455 TEU	2004	300 m	Hyundai - 12 RTA 96 C-B	5.9	B
448	NORTHERN JAMBOREE IMO 9450363	8,400 TEU	2010	333 m	MAN - 10K98ME-C	5.9	B

Page 9 of 41 — 2,034 vessels

← Prev Next →

Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.