Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#348 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
7.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
-36% greener
B

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 223 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

45
Q4
39
'27 Q1
40
'27 Q2
34
'27 Q3
32
'27 Q4
30
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 648 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
300 TIAN HUI
IMO 9774599
37,130 2017
6.6
B
302 PACIFIC HARMONY
IMO 9701451
31,798 2015
6.6
B
303 BLUE ONE
IMO 9585651
37,064 2011
6.6
B
304 FIRST BROTHER
IMO 9266140
32,385 2003
6.7
B
306 K BEREKET
IMO 9370408
33,225 2008
6.7
B
305 INVENTANA
IMO 9186223
44,982 2000
6.7
B
307 EIKE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9794472
38,520 2017
6.7
B
308 TIAN QI
IMO 9722742
37,940 2016
6.7
B
310 ECO TIDE
IMO 9576739
35,916 2011
6.7
B
309 STAR KVARVEN
IMO 9396153
49,856 2010
6.7
B
311 NEGMAR CICEK
IMO 9542685
31,997 2011
6.7
B
313 HG ROTTERDAM
IMO 9598921
37,873 2019
6.7
B
312 UBC SALERNO
IMO 9652519
32,702 2013
6.7
B
314 SEREF KURU
IMO 8606111
13,047 1987
6.8
B
315 ECO CATHAR
IMO 9526162
38,494 2012
6.8
B
316 IVS SUNBIRD
IMO 9736042
33,399 2015
6.8
B
317 PRIME STAR
IMO 9612284
36,570 2012
6.8
B
318 PATRIA
IMO 9580053
32,069 2014
6.8
B
319 SAVONA
IMO 9220976
31,923 2000
6.8
B
323 SUNSET
IMO 9402122
37,334 2009
6.8
B
322 DOUBLE DIAMOND
IMO 9478470
33,145 2011
6.8
B
321 TIAN LU
IMO 9704740
38,122 2015
6.8
B
320 PRINCE FAROUK
IMO 9125229
26,412 1997
6.8
B
324 OBE DINARES
IMO 9370367
33,440 2008
6.8
B
325 NORDIC OSLO
IMO 9626601
35,866 2012
6.8
B
326 AFRICAN HALCYON
IMO 9343613
32,245 2007
6.8
B
327 FUAT SEZGIN
IMO 9597587
38,278 2011
6.8
B
329 REESTBORG
IMO 9592563
23,317 2013
6.9
B
328 KUROBE
IMO 9392171
30,166 2010
6.9
B
330 AKDENIZ S
IMO 9519377
9,161 2008
6.9
B
332 CORINTHIAN SPIRE
IMO 9478482
32,154 2009
6.9
B
331 UBC STOCKHOLM
IMO 9426879
33,301 2010
6.9
B
333 FERASET
IMO 9747651
26,354 2015
6.9
B
334 PLUTO
IMO 9432531
32,092 2014
6.9
B
336 KAPADOKYA
IMO 9268083
31,646 2004
6.9
B
335 RUBY
IMO 9626390
37,039 2012
6.9
B
338 AAL LIMASSOL
IMO 9958755
32,517 2024
6.9
B
337 BC ZOE
IMO 9711901
33,443 2014
6.9
B
339 TRANSAMERICA
IMO 9486257
26,391 2010
6.9
B
340 MOON GATE
IMO 9400904
32,292 2009
6.9
B
341 IVS KINGLET
IMO 9459149
33,132 2011
7.0
B
342 USG ZURICH
IMO 9458444
28,309 2013
7.0
B
343 INCHEON BAY
IMO 9791963
37,501 2017
7.0
B
344 PROPEL PROSPERITY
IMO 9317690
37,504 2006
7.0
B
345 CAPTAIN DIMITRIS S
IMO 9400954
32,309 2010
7.0
B
347 LIBRA DREAM
IMO 9302918
31,700 2005
7.0
B
346 CHIPOL YONG AN
IMO 9509683
33,249 2010
7.0
B
350 UBC TOKYO
IMO 9300752
37,865 2005
7.0
B
349 MANTA HACER
IMO 9303429
32,316 2004
7.0
B
348 MANTA ZUHAL
IMO 9374351
37,313 2008
7.0
B
Page 7 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.