Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)

#1,101 of 2,098 container ships

CO₂ intensity

8.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm

vs segment average (10.38)

-16% greener

Bulk Carrier Container Ship Oil Tanker Chemical Tanker Gas Carrier LNG Carrier General Cargo Vehicle Carrier Refrigerated Cargo Ro-Ro Cargo

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E

A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

'27 Q1

'27 Q2

'27 Q3

'27 Q4

112

'28 Q1

'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

Measure	Eligible	CO₂ reduction	Capex band	Payback	Confidence
Turbocharger cut-out	1,485	1–3%	€80k–250k	—	vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement	1,440	5–10%	€400k–1,200k	—	vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling	1,344	2–6%	€300k–900k	—	vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion	965	5–15%	€8,000k–20,000k	—	vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion	795	15–25%	€15,000k–35,000k	—	vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO	360	3–6%	€500–1,500/kW	—	vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624

D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure

€3,295–7,790M

capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)

1.48–2.63 Mt

annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

Vessel	Band	Age	Drop year	Req. reduction 2030	Dock window
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k	E	16y	2026	78%	Jan 2028
SEPELU · <25k	E	26y	2026	69%	Aug 2028
MSC SABRINA III · <25k	E	37y	2026	61%	Mar 2027
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k	E	18y	2026	59%	Mar 2028
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k	E	21y	2026	55%	Feb 2027

See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

Sort 🌱 Greenest first 🔧 Least efficient first — retrofit candidates

Size (TEU)

All sizes < 3,000 TEU 3k – 8k TEU 8k – 14k TEU > 14,000 TEU

Year

2025 2024

2,076

vessels ranked

2.25

greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)

8.4

segment median

#	Vessel	Size (TEU)	Built	Length	Main Engine	Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm)	Grade
1101	GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE IMO 9302073	5,642 TEU	2006	285 m	MAN - 11K98MC	8.8	C
1102	LUNA MAERSK IMO 9190781	4,045 TEU	2002	266 m	Doosan - 10K90MC	8.8	C
1103	CHACABUCO IMO 9295957	5,527 TEU	2006	276 m	Sulzer - 10RT-flex96C	8.8	C
1104	MAERSK OHIO IMO 9298698	4,300 TEU	2006	292 m	Hyundai - 10K90MC-C	8.8	C
1105	GSL KALLIOPI IMO 9285689	7,455 TEU	2004	300 m	Hyundai - 12 RTA 96 C-B	8.8	C
1106	RIO GRANDE EXPRESS IMO 9301823	4,253 TEU	2003	260 m	MAN - 8K90MC-C	8.8	C
1107	CAPE MOSS IMO 9445916	2,758 TEU	2011	213 m	Hudong Heavy Machinery - 8RT-FLEX68D	8.8	C
1108	MSC SHANELLE V IMO 9292175	4,738 TEU	2004	294 m	Hyundai - 8K98MC-C	8.8	C
1109	MSC BERN V IMO 9362449	4,300 TEU	2008	261 m	MAN - 8K90MC-C	8.8	C
1110	PANAMA EXPRESS IMO 9641223	6,900 TEU	2013	270 m	Hyundai - 8S80ME-C9.2	8.8	C
1111	CMA CGM CHIWAN IMO 9224312	4,253 TEU	2001	260 m	8K90MC-C	8.8	C
1112	CAPE SABLE IMO 9950131	2,700 TEU	2024	189 m	7S60ME-C10-HPSCR	8.8	C
1113	MSC HERMES IMO 9350317	2,490 TEU	2006	212 m	MAN - 7S70MC	8.8	C
1114	MSC CORUNA IMO 9480215	5,550 TEU	2011	270 m	Doosan - 7K98MC-C	8.8	C
1115	SEASPAN SANTOS IMO 9301835	4,253 TEU	2006	260 m	MAN - 8K90MC-C	8.8	C
1116	PEPI STAR IMO 9971020	1,800 TEU	2024	172 m	Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd - South Korea 6S60ME-C10-HPSCR	8.8	C
1117	MSC CARPATHIA III IMO 9253038	2,826 TEU	2003	222 m	Hyundai - 7K80MC-C	8.8	C
1118	NYK NEBULA IMO 9337640	4,888 TEU	2007	294 m	MAN - 9K98MC-C	8.8	C
1119	MSC HOUSTON V IMO 9463281	4,432 TEU	2010	267 m	Wärtsilä - 10RT-flex82C	8.8	C
1120	LICA MAERSK IMO 9190779	3,700 TEU	2001	266 m	10K90MC	8.8	C
1121	ZIM SHENZHEN IMO 9461491	8,600 TEU	2011	335 m	Wärtsilä - 12RT-flex96C	8.8	C
1122	CONTI CORTESIA IMO 9293753	8,084 TEU	2005	334 m	Sulzer - 12RTA96C	8.8	C
1123	SINE A IMO 9343089	2,824 TEU	2008	222 m	MAN - 7K80MC-C	8.8	C
1124	LOUIS MAERSK IMO 9190731	4,045 TEU	2001	266 m	Doosan - 10K90MC	8.8	C
1125	HOLSATIA IMO 9233856	4,253 TEU	2003	260 m	8K90MC-C	8.8	C
1126	MSC NICOLE X IMO 9214898	7,226 TEU	1998	347 m	MAN - 12 K 90 MC	8.8	C
1127	MOL EXPERIENCE IMO 9333838	4,803 TEU	2007	294 m	MAN - 9K98MC-C	8.8	C
1128	MSC GIANNA III IMO 9152856	2,517 TEU	1998	202 m	Hyundai - 8 K 80 MC-C	8.8	C
1129	JAKARTA EXPRESS IMO 9539688	4,672 TEU	2012	260 m	CSSC - 8K80ME-C	8.8	C
1130	PANDA 001 IMO 9290787	5,527 TEU	2005	276 m	Sulzer - 10RTA96C	8.9	C
1131	MSC SENA IMO 9116369	2,517 TEU	1996	202 m	Hyundai - 8 K 80 MC-C	8.9	C
1132	SEADREAM IMO 9632832	5,023 TEU	2014	255 m	MAN - 6G80ME-C9	8.9	C
1133	MSC CARMEN IMO 9349813	4,860 TEU	2008	275 m	MAN - 7K98MC-C	8.9	C
1134	MSC FELIXSTOWE IMO 9290402	5,042 TEU	2005	294 m	Sulzer - 8RTA96C	8.9	C
1135	W KYRENIA IMO 9211494	6,802 TEU	2001	300 m	Sulzer - 12RTA96C	8.9	C
1136	ZIM ATLANTIC IMO 9440801	4,300 TEU	2009	262 m	Hyundai - 8RTA82C	8.9	C
1137	MSC MARITINA V IMO 9294408	4,035 TEU	2005	266 m	Sulzer - 8RT-flex96C	8.9	C
1138	QUEBEC EXPRESS IMO 9294836	5,512 TEU	2006	268 m	Sulzer - 10RTA96C	8.9	C
1139	MAERSK GARONNE IMO 9235579	4,318 TEU	2003	292 m	Hyundai - 10K90MC-C-MKV	8.9	C
1140	NYK METEOR IMO 9337638	4,888 TEU	2007	294 m	MAN - 9K98MC-C	8.9	C
1141	CMA CGM EIFFEL IMO 9248112	4,367 TEU	2002	282 m	MAN - 8K98MC-C	8.9	C
1142	MSC ROMA IMO 9304447	9,200 TEU	2006	337 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	8.9	C
1143	JOLLY ROSA IMO 9484534	4,400 TEU	2010	260 m	Doosan - 8K90MC-C	8.9	C
1144	MAERSK TENNESSEE IMO 9314210	4,154 TEU	2007	292 m	Wärtsilä - 8RT-flex96C	8.9	C
1145	YM FOUNTAIN IMO 9278090	5,551 TEU	2002	275 m	Hyundai - HYUNDAI SULZER 10RTA96C	9.0	C
1146	XIN DA LIAN IMO 9234331	5,668 TEU	2003	280 m	MAN - 12K90MC-C	9.0	C
1147	DUBAI EXPRESS IMO 9440825	4,300 TEU	2009	262 m	Wärtsilä - 8RTA82C	9.0	C
1148	ZIM VIRGINIA IMO 9231808	4,800 TEU	2002	294 m	Hyundai - HYUNDAI - MAN B&W 9K90MC-C	9.0	C
1149	SEATTLE C IMO 9360910	4,253 TEU	2007	260 m	Doosan - 8K90MC-C	9.0	C
1150	CHIQUITA CENTURY IMO 9339595	2,500 TEU	2008	209 m	Hudong Heavy Machinery - 6 K80ME-C	9.0	C

Page 23 of 41 — 2,034 vessels

← Prev Next →

Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.