Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,141 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
+1% higher
D

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1101 MATILDA
IMO 9407457
112,935 2006
5.0
D
1102 ALORA
IMO 9374856
73,604 2007
5.0
D
1103 ECLIPSE I
IMO 9301536
158,933 2006
5.0
D
1104 JESSIE GLORY
IMO 9952983
49,700 2024
5.0
D
1105 ALATAU
IMO 9416551
115,896 2009
5.0
D
1106 KALAHARI
IMO 9410882
112,827 2006
5.1
D
1107 STI MYTHIC
IMO 9833553
47,499 2017
5.1
D
1108 MERONAS
IMO 9934905
49,990 2022
5.1
D
1109 IRINI
IMO 9934890
49,990 2022
5.1
D
1110 STAVANGER PRIDE
IMO 9856062
49,999 2020
5.1
D
1111 PS AMALFI
IMO 9439395
99,987 2010
5.1
D
1112 NAVIG8 MESSI
IMO 9482859
75,618 2011
5.1
D
1113 SEA EAGLE
IMO 9849045
49,916 2019
5.1
D
1114 EMERALD EXPRESS
IMO 9425564
50,110 2006
5.1
D
1115 HAFNIA JAGUAR
IMO 9635858
49,999 2014
5.1
D
1116 PUFFIN PACIFIC
IMO 9876402
49,903 2018
5.1
D
1117 NOSTOS
IMO 9258014
47,147 2003
5.1
D
1118 CEDAR EXPRESS
IMO 9447770
51,495 2013
5.1
D
1119 HAFNIA EXCEL
IMO 9735579
74,547 2015
5.1
D
1120 VS PROGRESS
IMO 9351426
73,727 2003
5.1
D
1121 HAFNIA PROVIDENCE
IMO 9737759
74,997 2016
5.1
D
1122 S FONTVIEILLE
IMO 9645786
49,990 2013
5.1
D
1123 EAGLE HAMILTON
IMO 9426207
114,022 2010
5.1
D
1124 MARINA M
IMO 9952610
49,842 2021
5.1
D
1125 GISELE
IMO 9321196
74,998 2007
5.2
D
1126 P. ALIKI
IMO 9460136
105,304 2010
5.2
D
1127 NAVIG8 HONOR
IMO 9556181
75,000 2006
5.2
D
1128 HAFNIA PANTHER
IMO 9694464
49,999 2014
5.2
D
1129 MAERSK TEESPORT
IMO 9726463
49,990 2016
5.2
D
1130 LEO SUN
IMO 9457608
114,531 2011
5.2
D
1131 CASTRO ALVES
IMO 9547673
115,728 2008
5.2
D
1132 ADVANTAGE PADOVA
IMO 9794848
75,111 2019
5.2
D
1133 SEA COUGAR
IMO 9834868
49,910 2019
5.2
D
1134 SANDPIPER PACIFIC
IMO 9648192
51,833 2013
5.2
D
1135 WONDER ALTAIR
IMO 9884825
50,302 2015
5.2
D
1136 ST. MARY
IMO 9439797
50,215 2009
5.2
D
1137 EAGLE BLANE
IMO 9833101
128,427 2020
5.2
D
1138 CMC ANCUD
IMO 9681106
49,990 2014
5.2
D
1139 MINERVA EMILY
IMO 9380063
47,408 2009
5.2
D
1140 KRITI STATE
IMO 9324289
76,565 2006
5.2
D
1141 MONTE ROSA
IMO 9301952
74,932 2003
5.2
D
1142 STI DUCHESSA
IMO 9669938
49,990 2012
5.3
D
1143 ULYSSES I
IMO 9426283
53,520 2010
5.3
D
1144 STI DAMA
IMO 9686716
49,990 2014
5.3
D
1145 VALPIAVE
IMO 9453030
115,909 2010
5.3
D
1146 ADVANTAGE ATOM
IMO 9472622
116,014 2011
5.3
D
1147 HAFNIA OSPREY
IMO 9682241
49,999 2015
5.3
D
1148 SEAWAYS MYSTERY
IMO 9392808
49,999 2006
5.3
D
1149 VS PROSPERA
IMO 9298313
73,869 2005
5.3
D
1150 SEAWAYS LONSDALE
IMO 9697612
49,990 2014
5.3
D
Page 23 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.