Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,294 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
10.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-3% greener
D
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1251 GREAT TEMA
IMO 9935038
2,000 TEU 2023
9.8
C
1252 NORDPACIFIC
IMO 9802487
2,500 TEU 2018
9.8
C
1253 AEOLUS
IMO 9088524
1,906 TEU 1996
9.9
C
1254 MSC RENAISSANCE III
IMO 9358436
3,400 TEU 2006
9.9
C
1255 GH FOEHN
IMO 9377559
2,700 TEU 2008
9.9
C
1256 GEMLIK EXPRESS
IMO 9751107
1,730 TEU 2017
9.9
C
1257 MSC ANGELA
IMO 9351593
4,254 TEU 2008
9.9
C
1258 OOCL KOBE
IMO 9329526
4,506 TEU 2007
9.9
C
1259 ONTARIO EXPRESS
IMO 9290816
5,512 TEU 2005
9.9
C
1260 JAMAICA EXPRESS
IMO 9686912
6,800 TEU 2015
9.9
C
1261 BALTIMORE STAR
IMO 9440796
4,300 TEU 2009
9.9
D
1262 MSC MELANI III
IMO 9399741
2,750 TEU 2007
9.9
D
1263 IZMIT EXPRESS
IMO 9740665
1,730 TEU 2017
9.9
D
1264 MANDALAY
IMO 9743502
2,239 TEU 2019
9.9
D
1265 MED TRABZON
IMO 9141780
2,052 TEU 1997
10.0
D
1266 GREAT CASABLANCA
IMO 9935052
2,000 TEU 2024
10.0
D
1267 ALLEGRI
IMO 9127459
1,120 TEU 1997
10.0
D
1268 BAHRI TABUK
IMO 9620968
364 TEU 2013
10.0
D
1269 SEASPAN SYDNEY
IMO 9290103
4,253 TEU 2005
10.0
D
1270 MEXICO EXPRESS
IMO 9686900
6,428 TEU 2015
10.0
D
1271 MSC MASHA 3
IMO 9188219
2,169 TEU 1998
10.0
D
1272 MSC KYUNGMIN
IMO 9967005
1,800 TEU 2025
10.0
D
1273 KASHAN
IMO 9270696
2,200 TEU 2016
10.0
D
1274 NEOKASTRO
IMO 9400215
4,043 TEU 2011
10.0
D
1275 XIN CHANG SHA
IMO 9312559
4,250 TEU 2005
10.0
D
1276 MSC KIM
IMO 9351581
4,254 TEU 2008
10.0
D
1277 MSC CAGLIARI IV
IMO 9318187
3,853 TEU 2007
10.0
D
1278 BIG DOG
IMO 9256377
1,400 TEU 2003
10.0
D
1279 HANSA AUSTRALIA
IMO 9459436
3,646 TEU 2014
10.0
D
1280 CMA CGM TARRAGONA
IMO 9471214
4,250 TEU 2010
10.1
D
1281 ZIM ASIA
IMO 9464716
4,308 TEU 2010
10.1
D
1282 MSC BARBADOS
IMO 9289544
5,047 TEU 2005
10.1
D
1283 MERSIN EXPRESS
IMO 9740653
1,730 TEU 2017
10.1
D
1284 CMA CGM PARANAGUA
IMO 9246683
3,091 TEU 2005
10.1
D
1285 MSC PASSION III
IMO 9399765
2,750 TEU 2008
10.1
D
1286 MAERSK BULAN
IMO 9355343
3,100 TEU 2005
10.1
D
1287 ZIM IBERIA
IMO 9431719
4,250 TEU 2009
10.1
D
1288 MAERSK BOSTON
IMO 9313905
4,196 TEU 2006
10.1
D
1289 LISBON EXPRESS
IMO 9108128
2,400 TEU 1995
10.1
D
1290 CMA CGM SAVANNAH
IMO 9348431
4,025 TEU 2008
10.1
D
1291 GSL MELINA
IMO 9509152
3,400 TEU 2013
10.1
D
1292 SEASPAN NEW DELHI
IMO 9301770
4,253 TEU 2003
10.1
D
1293 ATLANTIC SEA
IMO 9670597
3,817 TEU 2012
10.1
D
1294 CELSIUS NICOSIA
IMO 9330496
3,450 TEU 2007
10.1
D
1295 ITAL BONNY
IMO 9786970
2,800 TEU 2015
10.1
D
1296 MSC ROWAN
IMO 9477610
4,250 TEU 2012
10.2
D
1297 MAERSK BINTAN
IMO 9355288
3,194 TEU 2005
10.2
D
1298 NIKOLAS
IMO 9203526
2,506 TEU 2000
10.2
D
1299 CMA CGM LAPIS
IMO 9386495
4,300 TEU 2009
10.2
D
1300 ATLANTICA PIONEER
IMO 9449120
3,635 TEU 2012
10.2
D
Page 26 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.