Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,019 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
12.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+24% higher
D

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1001 STOLT SUN
IMO 9149512
22,198 2000
12.0
D
1002 SWAN PRIDE
IMO 9806665
12,686 2017
12.0
D
1003 CARPE DIEM II
IMO 9428815
25,175 2006
12.0
D
1004 PVT AURORA
IMO 9508938
19,991 2012
12.0
D
1005 TRISTAR NATASHA
IMO 9721748
19,801 2016
12.0
D
1006 STOLT SEA
IMO 9149495
22,198 1999
12.0
D
1007 CHEMICAL RANGER
IMO 9940746
14,513 2023
12.0
D
1008 GOODAL
IMO 9244374
17,396 2001
12.1
D
1009 STOLT PERSEVERANCE
IMO 9124471
37,059 2001
12.1
D
1010 ORIS HELGA
IMO 9483619
7,739 2008
12.1
D
1011 LATANA
IMO 9186352
15,990 2000
12.1
D
1012 GULF PETROLEUM 4
IMO 9439345
13,006 2009
12.1
D
1013 STOLT STREAM
IMO 9169940
22,199 2000
12.1
D
1014 STOLT INNOVATION
IMO 9102069
36,876 1996
12.1
D
1015 JULIA THERESA
IMO 9837573
12,606 2019
12.2
D
1016 STOLT SKUA
IMO 9199311
8,594 1999
12.2
D
1017 TRANS CHEMICA
IMO 9314715
12,430 2005
12.2
D
1018 TERNHOLM
IMO 9300829
14,825 2005
12.2
D
1019 SG FRIENDSHIP
IMO 9288576
19,772 2003
12.3
D
1020 DIAVOLO ROSSO
IMO 9721750
20,086 2016
12.3
D
1021 GABY
IMO 9263136
21,183 2002
12.3
D
1022 STOLT KASHI
IMO 9266243
25,148 2003
12.3
D
1023 STOLT HALCON
IMO 9376658
12,581 2008
12.3
D
1024 SEA MAJESTIC
IMO 9391153
19,997 2008
12.4
D
1025 THUN LIFFEY
IMO 9829007
18,684 2020
12.4
D
1026 SILVER TIGER
IMO 9234680
37,383 2002
12.4
D
1027 ULUS
IMO 9314806
37,311 2006
12.4
D
1028 ERRIA SWAN
IMO 9347748
11,336 2006
12.4
D
1029 OLYMPIC FLAME
IMO 9298375
20,635 2007
12.4
D
1030 KISO
IMO 9379894
33,641 2008
12.4
D
1031 TRANS CATALONIA
IMO 9176694
19,715 2000
12.4
D
1032 SCOT FRANKFURT
IMO 9274537
8,182 2005
12.4
D
1033 THUN LUNDY
IMO 9837872
18,684 2020
12.5
D
1034 ELISABETH SCHULTE
IMO 9439840
16,371 2006
12.5
D
1035 ORIENTAL TULIP
IMO 9890549
16,268 2020
12.5
D
1036 CAESAR
IMO 9235696
40,083 2002
12.5
D
1037 NQ FREESIA
IMO 9829772
13,029 2018
12.5
D
1038 JBU SAPPHIRE
IMO 9412725
19,860 2009
12.5
D
1039 EDZARD SCHULTE
IMO 9439852
16,379 2006
12.6
D
1040 CAN KA
IMO 9312925
37,582 2006
12.6
D
1041 UIKKU
IMO 9797814
17,500 2018
12.6
D
1042 EASTERLY BIRDIE
IMO 9423724
25,399 2009
12.6
D
1043 QIKIQTAALUK W.
IMO 9421221
19,998 2011
12.6
D
1044 FMT EFES
IMO 9427990
14,374 2010
12.6
D
1045 OWL 4
IMO 9435557
13,075 2006
12.6
D
1046 TRANS TIND
IMO 9594054
14,281 2010
12.7
D
1047 PVT SUNRISE
IMO 9565742
19,806 2011
12.7
D
1048 GINGA PUMA
IMO 9343780
26,046 2006
12.7
D
1049 STOLT VIKING
IMO 9196711
26,707 2001
12.8
D
1050 GOLDEN OAK
IMO 9445655
13,167 2007
12.8
D
Page 21 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.