Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)

#850 of 2,098 container ships

CO₂ intensity

7.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm

vs segment average (10.39)

-28% greener

Bulk Carrier Container Ship Oil Tanker Chemical Tanker Gas Carrier LNG Carrier General Cargo Vehicle Carrier Refrigerated Cargo Ro-Ro Cargo

CII band distribution

1,080 at D/E

A 313B 411C 706D 598E 482

2,510 rated vessels · 557 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

102

'27 Q1

'27 Q2

'27 Q3

'27 Q4

118

'28 Q1

105

'28 Q2

'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

Measure	Eligible	CO₂ reduction	Capex band	Payback	Confidence
Turbocharger cut-out	1,642	1–3%	€80k–250k	—	vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement	1,427	5–10%	€400k–1,200k	—	vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling	1,330	2–6%	€300k–900k	—	vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion	933	5–15%	€8,000k–20,000k	—	vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion	763	15–25%	€15,000k–35,000k	—	vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO	353	3–6%	€500–1,500/kW	—	vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623

D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure

€3,176–7,513M

capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)

1.44–2.55 Mt

annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

Vessel	Band	Age	Drop year	Req. reduction 2030	Dock window
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k	E	16y	2026	78%	Dec 2027
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k	E	1y	2026	72%	Oct 2027
SEPELU · <25k	E	26y	2026	69%	Jul 2028
MSC SABRINA III · <25k	E	37y	2026	61%	Mar 2027
C LION · 100-200k	E	21y	2026	59%	Feb 2028

See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

Sort 🌱 Greenest first 🔧 Least efficient first — retrofit candidates

Size (TEU)

All sizes < 3,000 TEU 3k – 8k TEU 8k – 14k TEU > 14,000 TEU

Year

2025 2024

2,076

vessels ranked

2.25

greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)

8.41

segment median

#	Vessel	Size (TEU)	Built	Length	Main Engine	Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm)	Grade
801	W KAMPALA IMO 9215311	6,802 TEU	2001	300 m	HHI - 12RTA96C	7.3	B
802	MSC HEIDI IMO 9309473	8,401 TEU	2006	332 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	7.4	B
805	MSC SWEDEN VI IMO 9231262	5,762 TEU	2002	277 m	Doosan - 12K90MC	7.4	B
804	KOBE EXPRESS IMO 9143544	4,612 TEU	1997	294 m	SAMSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. 9 K 90 MC	7.4	B
803	MSC ELLEN IMO 9166780	7,226 TEU	1999	347 m	Hitachi - 12K90MC	7.4	B
809	ONE HONG KONG IMO 9395161	8,212 TEU	2009	336 m	MAN - 12K98ME	7.4	B
808	APL MEXICO CITY IMO 9632210	9,200 TEU	2011	328 m	Doosan - 10S90ME-C MK9.2 TIER 2	7.4	B
807	COSCO SHANGHAI IMO 9221097	5,618 TEU	2001	280 m	Kawasaki - 10L90MC	7.4	B
806	MAERSK GIRONDE IMO 9235555	4,318 TEU	2002	292 m	Hyundai - 10K90MC-C MK5	7.4	B
810	MSC TAERIM IMO 9966984	1,800 TEU	2024	172 m	MAN - 6S60ME-C10	7.4	B
811	SHIJING IMO 9348663	5,085 TEU	2007	294 m	MAN - 9K90MC-C	7.4	B
813	NYK VESTA IMO 9312808	9,012 TEU	2007	338 m	MAN - 12K98ME	7.4	B
812	SAN DIEGO IMO 9398412	8,200 TEU	2010	334 m	MAN - 12K98MC	7.4	B
816	MEHUIN IMO 9400100	6,300 TEU	2011	306 m	Wärtsilä - 10RT-flex96C	7.4	B
815	ZIM VIETNAM IMO 9244922	6,644 TEU	2003	304 m	Hyundai - 10 K 98 MC-C	7.4	B
814	CMA CGM JEAN GABRIEL IMO 9729128	10,926 TEU	2018	300 m	CSSC - 9S90ME-C8	7.4	B
818	MSC BETTINA IMO 9399038	13,798 TEU	2010	366 m	Doosan - 12K98MC-C	7.4	C
817	CAPE SCOTT IMO 9950117	2,700 TEU	2023	189 m	Hudong Heavy Machinery Co Ltd - China 7S60ME-C10-HPSCR	7.4	C
819	CMA CGM ERMITAGE IMO 9961295	2,000 TEU	2024	204 m	HD Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd - South Korea 6S60ME-C10-GI	7.4	C
821	KARLSKRONA IMO 9085558	6,000 TEU	1996	318 m	Mitsui - 12K90MC	7.4	C
823	NYK DIANA IMO 9337688	4,888 TEU	2008	294 m	MAN - 9K98ME-C	7.4	C
820	MSC MATILDE V IMO 9181663	4,400 TEU	1999	294 m	MAN 9K90MC	7.4	C
824	GENOA EXPRESS IMO 9626041	3,832 TEU	2014	228 m	Wärtsilä - 7RT-flex82C	7.4	C
822	MSC BRUNELLA IMO 9702106	8,819 TEU	2015	300 m	MAN - 9S90ME-C9	7.4	C
826	MSC GREENWICH IMO 9286267	8,189 TEU	2004	334 m	Hyundai - 12 K98MC	7.4	C
825	COSCO ANTWERP IMO 9246396	5,618 TEU	2001	280 m	Kawasaki - 10L90MC MK V	7.4	C
827	CMA CGM TAGE IMO 9674555	9,200 TEU	2015	300 m	Hyundai - 9S90ME-C9	7.5	C
829	MSC ROMANE IMO 9745653	9,408 TEU	2017	300 m	MAN - 9S90ME-C10	7.5	C
828	NYK RUMINA IMO 9416991	4,888 TEU	2010	294 m	MAN - 9K98ME-C	7.5	C
831	MSC SAMANTHA VI IMO 9110377	5,711 TEU	1996	275 m	Hyundai - 12K90MC-C	7.5	C
830	CMA CGM IMAGINATION IMO 9948231	6,874 TEU	2021	272 m	Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd - South Korea 7G80ME-C10-HPSCR	7.5	C
832	MSC ELA IMO 9282259	5,059 TEU	2004	294 m	HSD ENGINE CO., LTD. 9 K 90 MC	7.5	C
834	CMA CGM LISA MARIE IMO 9729099	10,926 TEU	2017	300 m	CSSC - 9S90ME-C9	7.5	C
833	ONE HAMMERSMITH IMO 9395147	8,212 TEU	2009	336 m	Kawasaki - 12K98ME	7.5	C
835	MSC SINDY IMO 9336048	9,178 TEU	2007	337 m	MAN - 12K98MC-C	7.5	C
836	MSC SANTHYA IMO 8913411	3,005 TEU	1991	237 m	BREMER VULKAN AG SCHIFFBAU UND MASCHINENFABRIK 7 L 80 MC	7.5	C
837	MSC BRIANNA IMO 9103685	4,507 TEU	1996	294 m	HANJUNG CHANGWON PLANT 8 K 90 MC-C	7.5	C
838	RDO CONCORD IMO 9401283	6,966 TEU	2009	304 m	MAN - 10K98MC	7.5	C
839	CMA CGM RUNDALE IMO 9961300	2,000 TEU	2024	204 m	HD Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd - South Korea 6S60ME-C10-GI	7.5	C
843	ZIM AMERICA IMO 9244934	6,644 TEU	2003	304 m	Hyundai - 10 K 98 MC-C	7.5	C
842	MSC NERISSA V IMO 9278155	5,059 TEU	2004	294 m	HSD ENGINE CO., LTD. 9 K 90 MC-C	7.5	C
841	HELLA IMO 9535137	5,605 TEU	2011	275 m	MAN - 8K98ME	7.5	C
840	MARCOS V IMO 9307059	6,350 TEU	2005	293 m	MAN - 11K98MC	7.5	C
849	MSC DENMARK VI IMO 9231250	5,762 TEU	2002	277 m	MAN - 12 K 90 MC	7.5	C
848	MSC ORIANE IMO 9372482	5,800 TEU	2008	277 m	MAN - 12 K 90 MC	7.5	C
847	MSC CHANNE IMO 9710438	8,800 TEU	2015	300 m	MAN - 9S90ME-C10	7.5	C
846	MSC VIDHI IMO 9238739	5,762 TEU	2001	277 m	Doosan - 12K90MC	7.5	C
845	BREMEN IMO 9450387	8,580 TEU	2009	334 m	Hyundai - HHI MAN B&W; 12K98MC-C7	7.5	C
844	CMA CGM NIAGARA IMO 9722675	9,894 TEU	2015	300 m	MAN - 8S90ME-C9	7.5	C
850	W KLAIPEDA IMO 9211482	6,802 TEU	2001	300 m	HHI - 12RTA96C	7.5	C

Page 17 of 41 — 2,034 vessels

← Prev Next →

Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.