Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,285 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
9.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-8% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1251 EXPRESS ARGENTINA
IMO 9443011
3,398 TEU 2010
9.0
C
1252 CMA CGM TAGE
IMO 9674555
9,200 TEU 2015
9.0
C
1253 PL GERMANY
IMO 9288394
5,888 TEU 2003
9.0
C
1254 MSC GUERNSEY V
IMO 9631876
5,001 TEU 2015
9.0
C
1255 MSC HANNAH
IMO 9316347
2,732 TEU 2006
9.0
C
1256 GSL MARIA
IMO 9231236
5,762 TEU 2001
9.0
C
1257 JAMAICA
IMO 9403229
4,253 TEU 2009
9.0
C
1258 ARICA EXPRESS
IMO 9495765
4,620 TEU 2013
9.0
C
1259 MAX SCHULTE
IMO 9676711
2,339 TEU 2015
9.0
C
1260 LISA
IMO 9418652
4,249 TEU 2009
9.0
C
1261 MAERSK BINTAN
IMO 9355288
3,194 TEU 2008
9.0
C
1262 YM FOUNTAIN
IMO 9278090
5,551 TEU 2002
9.0
C
1263 MSC SINGAPORE IV
IMO 9224348
4,250 TEU 2002
9.0
C
1264 MSC KATYAYNI VI
IMO 9110389
5,711 TEU 1996
9.0
C
1265 DIMITRA C
IMO 9250995
4,924 TEU 2002
9.0
C
1266 QUEBEC EXPRESS
IMO 9294836
5,512 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1267 EVER SMILE
IMO 9300415
7,024 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1268 KOTA KARIM
IMO 9307425
3,081 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1269 GREEN PARK
IMO 9983449
2,954 TEU 2022
9.1
C
1270 MSC NICOLE X
IMO 9214898
7,226 TEU 1998
9.1
C
1271 MSC ORIANE
IMO 9372482
5,800 TEU 2008
9.1
C
1272 CMA CGM MOMBASA
IMO 9367815
2,564 TEU 2008
9.1
C
1273 MSC TUXPAN V
IMO 9289972
5,060 TEU 2005
9.1
C
1274 CHIQUITA SAILOR
IMO 9344693
1,819 TEU 2008
9.1
C
1275 MSC ULSAN III
IMO 9305001
2,702 TEU 2004
9.1
C
1276 APL CALIFORNIA
IMO 9350044
6,350 TEU 2009
9.1
C
1277 TIANJIN
IMO 9398462
10,062 TEU 2010
9.1
C
1278 XIN XIA MEN
IMO 9270476
5,668 TEU 2004
9.1
C
1279 DELPHINUS C
IMO 9337652
4,888 TEU 2007
9.1
C
1280 MSC BANU III
IMO 9263332
3,534 TEU 2004
9.1
C
1281 VENTO DI LEVANTE
IMO 9683489
1,800 TEU 2015
9.1
C
1282 MAERSK BULAN
IMO 9355343
3,100 TEU 2008
9.1
C
1283 INDEPENDENT PRIMERO
IMO 9298636
3,091 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1284 MSC MANDY III
IMO 8918966
3,005 TEU 1993
9.1
C
1285 CHIQUITA HORIZON
IMO 1032426
1,747 TEU 2025
9.1
C
1286 SHANGHAI
IMO 9305570
9,469 TEU 2006
9.2
C
1287 MAERSK KENTUCKY
IMO 9193240
4,300 TEU 1999
9.2
C
1288 MSC ALICANTE
IMO 9480174
5,550 TEU 2011
9.2
C
1289 MSC MARIA LAURA II
IMO 8616520
2,505 TEU 1988
9.2
C
1290 LOUIS MAERSK
IMO 9190731
4,045 TEU 2001
9.2
C
1291 MSC TRACY V
IMO 9295177
4,900 TEU 2005
9.2
C
1292 TOKYO EXPRESS
IMO 9193290
4,890 TEU 2000
9.2
C
1293 MSC MICHIGAN VII
IMO 9196864
6,252 TEU 2000
9.2
C
1294 MAERSK BATAM
IMO 9355331
3,194 TEU 2008
9.2
C
1295 MSC RITA V
IMO 9313929
4,196 TEU 2006
9.2
C
1296 APL FLORIDA
IMO 9350032
6,350 TEU 2008
9.2
C
1297 CONTI CORTESIA
IMO 9293753
8,084 TEU 2005
9.2
C
1298 X-PRESS SALWEEN
IMO 9862748
1,800 TEU 2021
9.2
C
1299 MAERSK NOKWANDA
IMO 9294393
4,045 TEU 2005
9.2
C
1300 MSC ROMA
IMO 9304447
9,178 TEU 2006
9.2
C
Page 26 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.