Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#986 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
7.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-23% greener
C
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
951 GREENVILLE
IMO 9970014
7,200 TEU 2024
7.5
C
952 W KLAIPEDA
IMO 9211482
6,802 TEU 2001
7.5
C
954 MSC LAUSANNE VI
IMO 9320398
4,549 TEU 2005
7.5
C
953 SEASPAN EMISSARY
IMO 9407158
5,041 TEU 2009
7.5
C
956 VILNIA MAERSK
IMO 9778533
3,700 TEU 2019
7.5
C
955 OSAKA EXPRESS
IMO 9320697
8,606 TEU 2007
7.5
C
957 SANTA VIOLA
IMO 9295373
5,599 TEU 2005
7.5
C
959 MSC ATHENS
IMO 9618305
8,800 TEU 2013
7.5
C
958 MSC ELENI
IMO 9278143
5,050 TEU 2004
7.5
C
961 MAERSK HARTFORD
IMO 9333008
6,200 TEU 2007
7.5
C
960 SANTA RITA
IMO 9425382
7,114 TEU 2011
7.5
C
963 ANNIE B
IMO 9253026
2,826 TEU 2003
7.5
C
962 ZIM NORFOLK
IMO 9710220
9,000 TEU 2015
7.5
C
964 ZIM AMERICA
IMO 9244934
6,246 TEU 2003
7.5
C
965 MSC HEIDI
IMO 9309473
8,400 TEU 2006
7.5
C
966 MSC JULIE
IMO 9704996
8,800 TEU 2015
7.5
C
968 KOI
IMO 9461489
8,600 TEU 2011
7.5
C
967 MSC ELISA XIII
IMO 9463059
13,092 TEU 2011
7.5
C
970 EMERALD TOWER
IMO 9618288
8,800 TEU 2013
7.5
C
969 MSC CATERINA
IMO 9705005
8,800 TEU 2015
7.5
C
972 EVER LOADING
IMO 9629081
8,508 TEU 2014
7.5
C
971 CMA CGM ESTELLE
IMO 9729116
9,400 TEU 2018
7.5
C
975 MSC SORAYA
IMO 9372494
5,770 TEU 2008
7.6
C
977 MAERSK CAPE COAST
IMO 9525314
4,500 TEU 2011
7.6
C
974 CMA CGM LAMARTINE
IMO 9409194
6,500 TEU 2010
7.6
C
973 OOCL ST. LAWRENCE
IMO 9290414
5,042 TEU 2005
7.6
C
976 CMA CGM IMAGINATION
IMO 9948231
6,874 TEU 2024
7.6
C
979 MSC KRYSTAL
IMO 9372470
5,800 TEU 2008
7.6
C
978 MSC JEONGMIN
IMO 9720471
9,411 TEU 2016
7.6
C
980 HUDSON EXPRESS
IMO 9349564
6,435 TEU 2008
7.6
C
981 CMA CGM RODOLPHE
IMO 9729075
9,400 TEU 2017
7.6
C
982 CMA CGM LOIRE
IMO 9674531
9,365 TEU 2015
7.6
C
985 CHACABUCO
IMO 9295957
5,527 TEU 2006
7.6
C
984 CMA CGM BOLDNESS
IMO 9948243
6,874 TEU 2021
7.6
C
983 YANTIAN
IMO 9305594
9,383 TEU 2006
7.6
C
986 MSC ANYA V
IMO 9297864
5,018 TEU 2005
7.6
C
988 MAERSK SENANG
IMO 9315240
5,648 TEU 2007
7.6
C
987 MAERSK NUBA
IMO 9356115
2,478 TEU 2008
7.6
C
989 MSC JESSENIA R
IMO 9215672
3,799 TEU 2001
7.6
C
990 MSC LUANDA VIII
IMO 9301471
8,204 TEU 2006
7.6
C
991 SANTA CATARINA
IMO 9444730
7,090 TEU 2007
7.6
C
994 GSL CHATEAU D'IF
IMO 9335202
5,089 TEU 2007
7.6
C
993 CMA CGM WISDOM
IMO 9952830
6,874 TEU 2021
7.6
C
992 NYK REMUS
IMO 9416965
4,888 TEU 2009
7.6
C
995 MSC MAUREEN
IMO 9251717
6,750 TEU 2003
7.6
C
998 VALUE
IMO 9628166
8,800 TEU 2013
7.7
C
997 SYNERGY ANTWERP
IMO 9443580
4,253 TEU 2008
7.7
C
996 MSC LUISA
IMO 9225677
6,750 TEU 2002
7.7
C
1000 YM CONTINUITY
IMO 9864590
2,800 TEU 2018
7.7
C
999 MSC PILAR VI
IMO 9248148
5,752 TEU 2003
7.7
C
Page 20 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.