Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,851 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
15.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+54% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1851 MSC GAETA II
IMO 9306213
1,432 TEU 2007
16.0
E
1852 MATILDE A
IMO 9292448
1,200 TEU 2004
16.0
E
1853 ANNALISA P
IMO 9437141
1,296 TEU 2008
16.1
E
1854 ELBSPRING
IMO 9462794
1,425 TEU 2009
16.1
E
1855 BALTIC SHARK
IMO 9315032
868 TEU 2004
16.1
E
1856 CHATTANOOGA
IMO 9611034
1,042 TEU 2012
16.1
E
1857 MSC HOGGAR
IMO 9286449
858 TEU 2004
16.1
E
1858 CONTSHIP BOX
IMO 9449845
1,496 TEU 2009
16.2
E
1859 SC MARIGOT
IMO 9275115
1,200 TEU 2005
16.2
E
1860 EF EMIRA
IMO 9357810
1,706 TEU 2008
16.2
E
1861 BG GREEN
IMO 9964613
1,400 TEU 2021
16.2
E
1862 MSC IZMIR F
IMO 9127021
1,122 TEU 1996
16.3
E
1863 MSC CEDAR II
IMO 9231092
1,842 TEU 2001
16.3
E
1864 MARIELYST
IMO 9448669
1,080 TEU 2010
16.3
E
1865 MSC STRAIT II
IMO 9351218
1,713 TEU 2008
16.4
E
1866 MSC ELKE F
IMO 9318773
956 TEU 2005
16.4
E
1867 THETIS D
IMO 9372274
1,421 TEU 2009
16.5
E
1868 MICHIGAN
IMO 9437139
1,296 TEU 2008
16.5
E
1869 ONUR G.A
IMO 9238076
1,221 TEU 2001
16.6
E
1870 KARLA A
IMO 9297577
1,676 TEU 2004
16.6
E
1871 MSC ERMINIA III
IMO 9246346
2,490 TEU 2003
16.7
E
1872 MSC ASLI
IMO 9162631
1,388 TEU 2000
16.7
E
1873 MED TEKIRDAG
IMO 9265598
1,100 TEU 2003
16.8
E
1874 ALANA
IMO 9297589
1,008 TEU 2004
16.8
E
1875 DANIEL A
IMO 9238064
1,221 TEU 2001
16.8
E
1876 ANINA
IMO 9354351
1,008 TEU 2006
16.9
E
1877 MSC ALBA F
IMO 9499010
1,022 TEU 2008
16.9
E
1878 ATLANTIC NORTH
IMO 9236597
1,129 TEU 2002
16.9
E
1879 NORDIC PORTO
IMO 9448671
1,085 TEU 2011
17.0
E
1880 MEDKON MIRA
IMO 9152911
1,150 TEU 1998
17.0
E
1881 ELBSUMMER
IMO 9386718
1,425 TEU 2009
17.0
E
1882 BURAK BAYRAKTAR
IMO 9260536
858 TEU 2002
17.0
E
1883 MSC MARYLENA II
IMO 9169031
1,388 TEU 1998
17.1
E
1884 CMA CGM KAILAS
IMO 9339545
1,858 TEU 2006
17.1
E
1885 BG RED
IMO 9976965
1,400 TEU 2022
17.2
E
1886 HEINRICH EHLER
IMO 9372200
1,421 TEU 2008
17.2
E
1887 CMA CGM BLOSSOM
IMO 9962524
1,096 TEU 2023
17.3
E
1888 MSC RACHEL F
IMO 9212010
1,216 TEU 2000
17.3
E
1889 BG ORANGE
IMO 9964637
1,400 TEU 2021
17.4
E
1890 CMA CGM NOUADHIBOU
IMO 9376892
1,341 TEU 2007
17.4
E
1891 RMS ROSE
IMO 9318761
956 TEU 2005
17.5
E
1892 CMA CGM GULF EXPRESS
IMO 9239874
1,641 TEU 2002
17.6
E
1893 SKYVIEW
IMO 9358890
1,304 TEU 2007
17.6
E
1894 MERITO
IMO 9167942
1,104 TEU 1998
17.6
E
1895 EXPERT
IMO 9412529
1,025 TEU 2010
17.6
E
1896 ELBSTROM
IMO 9369007
974 TEU 2008
17.7
E
1897 MEDKON ANKA
IMO 9366469
1,155 TEU 2007
17.7
E
1898 WEC MONDRIAAN
IMO 9354363
868 TEU 2006
17.7
E
1899 BFR
IMO 9103386
652 TEU 1995
17.8
E
1900 FIONA
IMO 9149885
1,730 TEU 1998
17.8
E
Page 38 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.