Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,491 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
9.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
+81% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1451 CUMBIA1
IMO 9436343
50,213 2010
8.7
E
1452 STI ACTON
IMO 9696553
38,734 2014
8.7
E
1453 KINGSTON
IMO 9420863
38,341 2009
8.7
E
1454 NV ATHENA
IMO 9527075
21,166 2011
8.7
E
1455 YURIY KUCHIEV
IMO 9804033
52,292 2019
8.7
E
1456 ZAPPHIRE
IMO 9391957
47,329 2010
8.8
E
1457 MAERSK KATARINA
IMO 9431290
39,723 2011
8.8
E
1458 STARLIGHT I
IMO 9377664
37,824 2007
8.8
E
1459 AMBER BEE
IMO 9316608
40,084 2008
8.8
E
1460 SOUTHERN PUMA
IMO 9792008
26,071 2016
8.8
E
1461 MAERSK KARA
IMO 9374428
38,396 2008
8.8
E
1462 ANDROMEDA
IMO 9315795
39,378 2007
8.8
E
1463 FURE VICTORIA
IMO 9983968
17,951 2025
8.9
E
1464 MINERVA ANNA
IMO 9298507
39,990 2005
9.0
E
1465 VALTELLINA
IMO 9384136
37,481 2008
9.0
E
1466 VALSESIA
IMO 9385178
37,481 2008
9.0
E
1467 HENNING MAERSK
IMO 9389526
38,001 2010
9.0
E
1468 SAN FELIX
IMO 9314868
37,312 2007
9.0
E
1469 IDI
IMO 9307982
46,858 2007
9.1
E
1470 KRITI EPISKOPI
IMO 9340104
38,396 2006
9.2
E
1471 THE BLACKSMITH
IMO 9659660
31,289 2013
9.2
E
1472 SAM MAJESTY
IMO 9308144
50,338 2005
9.2
E
1473 M BRISTOL
IMO 9299434
29,050 2005
9.2
E
1474 FORTUNE
IMO 9379325
50,922 2008
9.2
E
1475 SEAEXPRESS
IMO 9344019
45,976 2007
9.2
E
1476 FURE VANGUARD
IMO 9963360
17,942 2024
9.2
E
1477 SEACOD
IMO 9352315
40,559 2006
9.2
E
1478 AEGEAS
IMO 9315800
39,378 2007
9.2
E
1479 VALGARDENA
IMO 9384124
37,481 2008
9.2
E
1480 STI BRIXTON
IMO 9686869
38,734 2014
9.3
E
1481 MINERVA GRACE
IMO 9305855
50,922 2005
9.3
E
1482 SUMER
IMO 9314856
37,258 2007
9.3
E
1483 ALKEA
IMO 9425502
36,207 2009
9.3
E
1484 SOUTHERN SHARK
IMO 9821299
26,051 2018
9.3
E
1485 LEANDER FISHER
IMO 9878058
34,724 2022
9.3
E
1486 SUNNY C
IMO 9470959
37,857 2010
9.3
E
1487 SAN MARCOS
IMO 9425540
50,120 2010
9.3
E
1488 BOSPOROS
IMO 9315903
39,589 2007
9.3
E
1489 SOUTHERN XANTIS
IMO 9883493
25,887 2020
9.4
E
1490 GEA
IMO 9292591
39,999 2005
9.4
E
1491 VALCADORE
IMO 9384112
37,481 2008
9.4
E
1492 SEAMARLIN
IMO 9380489
40,549 2007
9.4
E
1493 DICTADOR
IMO 1055430
18,416 2025
9.5
E
1494 BYZANTION
IMO 9315898
39,589 2007
9.5
E
1495 COSTANZA M
IMO 9436680
40,042 2009
9.5
E
1496 HTM DEFENDER
IMO 9346445
63,495 2008
9.5
E
1497 GRACE ROMAVICTOR
IMO 9629926
49,990 2011
9.5
E
1498 BORIS SOKOLOV
IMO 9817315
51,416 2018
9.5
E
1499 FURE VITEN
IMO 9898204
17,999 2021
9.5
E
1500 FURE VEN
IMO 9983102
17,945 2025
9.5
E
Page 30 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.