Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,686 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
14.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+41% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.4
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1651 CIRTA
IMO 9845051
1,500 TEU 2020
14.5
E
1652 CMA CGM HOMERE
IMO 9362322
1,691 TEU 2007
14.5
E
1653 ESSENCE
IMO 9491496
1,349 TEU 2011
14.5
E
1654 A LA MARINE
IMO 9386524
1,440 TEU 2009
14.5
E
1655 NORDLUCHS
IMO 9673666
1,730 TEU 2014
14.5
E
1656 MERATUS JAYAKARTA
IMO 9305879
2,474 TEU 2005
14.6
E
1657 OYKU A
IMO 9292462
1,200 TEU 2005
14.7
E
1658 EF EMIRA
IMO 9357810
1,706 TEU 2008
14.7
E
1659 AS FRANZISKA
IMO 9295517
1,335 TEU 2005
14.7
E
1660 MSC NITA
IMO 9084607
1,512 TEU 1996
14.7
E
1661 CMA CGM SAINT LAURENT
IMO 9709219
2,100 TEU 2015
14.7
E
1662 MSC EMILIE
IMO 9334832
1,732 TEU 2006
14.7
E
1663 EMOTION
IMO 9359258
1,440 TEU 2008
14.8
E
1664 CONTSHIP RUN
IMO 9306237
1,574 TEU 2007
14.8
E
1665 FREDERIK
IMO 9328637
1,200 TEU 2005
14.8
E
1666 CAPE FULMAR
IMO 9359313
1,440 TEU 2007
14.8
E
1667 MSC AGNA II
IMO 9509774
1,496 TEU 2009
14.9
E
1668 OKEE ALICIA
IMO 9334818
1,740 TEU 2007
14.9
E
1669 HARRISON
IMO 9220079
1,197 TEU 2002
15.0
E
1670 WYBELSUM
IMO 9386976
1,300 TEU 2008
15.0
E
1671 LASALLE
IMO 9349368
2,474 TEU 2006
15.0
E
1672 MSC NORDEROOG F
IMO 9256315
1,300 TEU 2004
15.0
E
1673 ONUR G.A
IMO 9238076
1,208 TEU 2001
15.0
E
1674 CHATTANOOGA
IMO 9611034
1,036 TEU 2012
15.1
E
1675 MARINA L
IMO 9431331
1,300 TEU 2009
15.1
E
1676 MEDKON ANKA
IMO 9366469
1,147 TEU 2007
15.1
E
1677 MSC PALATIUM III
IMO 9336165
2,500 TEU 2006
15.1
E
1678 AS SABRINA
IMO 9387463
1,700 TEU 2006
15.1
E
1679 DETTIFOSS
IMO 9822853
2,150 TEU 2020
15.2
E
1680 CONTSHIP SEA
IMO 9306213
1,574 TEU 2007
15.2
E
1681 MANDO
IMO 9175705
1,174 TEU 1999
15.2
E
1682 CELSIUS NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9412842
1,577 TEU 2007
15.3
E
1683 BG GREEN
IMO 9964613
1,400 TEU 2021
15.3
E
1684 TUKUMA ARCTICA
IMO 9822865
2,150 TEU 2020
15.3
E
1685 MSC IRA II
IMO 9323493
1,732 TEU 2007
15.3
E
1686 ANNALISA P
IMO 9437141
1,284 TEU 2008
15.3
E
1687 RUTH BORCHARD
IMO 9212034
1,216 TEU 2000
15.3
E
1688 EAGLE II
IMO 9301122
1,300 TEU 2006
15.4
E
1689 DOUCE FRANCE
IMO 9845661
2,200 TEU 2020
15.5
E
1690 SPIRIT OF CHENNAI
IMO 9813840
1,162 TEU 2019
15.5
E
1691 JOST
IMO 9477347
1,350 TEU 2010
15.5
E
1692 VERA D
IMO 9290177
1,683 TEU 2004
15.5
E
1693 MSC PAXI II
IMO 9256391
1,400 TEU 2004
15.6
E
1694 CMA CGM FORT ST PIERRE
IMO 9261891
2,226 TEU 2003
15.6
E
1695 JONNI RITSCHER
IMO 9333383
1,856 TEU 2006
15.6
E
1696 SONDERBORG
IMO 9454242
1,085 TEU 2012
15.7
E
1697 ELBELLA
IMO 9312640
1,740 TEU 2006
15.7
E
1698 MSC AMY
IMO 9242651
1,768 TEU 2002
15.7
E
1699 NORDIC ISTRIA
IMO 9474383
1,085 TEU 2011
15.7
E
1700 DANIEL A
IMO 9238064
1,208 TEU 2001
15.8
E
Page 34 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.