Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,106 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
8.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-16% greener
C
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1101 GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE
IMO 9302073
5,642 TEU 2006
8.8
C
1102 CAPE MOSS
IMO 9445916
2,758 TEU 2011
8.8
C
1103 LUNA MAERSK
IMO 9190781
4,045 TEU 2002
8.8
C
1104 MAERSK OHIO
IMO 9298698
4,300 TEU 2006
8.8
C
1105 RIO GRANDE EXPRESS
IMO 9301823
4,253 TEU 2003
8.8
C
1106 MSC SHANELLE V
IMO 9292175
4,738 TEU 2004
8.8
C
1107 MSC BERN V
IMO 9362449
4,300 TEU 2008
8.8
C
1108 PANAMA EXPRESS
IMO 9641223
6,900 TEU 2013
8.8
C
1109 CAPE SABLE
IMO 9950131
2,700 TEU 2024
8.8
C
1110 CMA CGM CHIWAN
IMO 9224312
4,253 TEU 2001
8.8
C
1111 MSC CORUNA
IMO 9480215
5,550 TEU 2011
8.8
C
1112 SEASPAN SANTOS
IMO 9301835
4,253 TEU 2006
8.8
C
1113 MSC HERMES
IMO 9350317
2,490 TEU 2006
8.8
C
1114 PEPI STAR
IMO 9971020
1,800 TEU 2024
8.8
C
1115 MSC HOUSTON V
IMO 9463281
4,432 TEU 2010
8.8
C
1116 MSC CARPATHIA III
IMO 9253038
2,826 TEU 2003
8.8
C
1117 LICA MAERSK
IMO 9190779
3,700 TEU 2001
8.8
C
1118 ZIM SHENZHEN
IMO 9461491
8,600 TEU 2011
8.8
C
1119 CONTI CORTESIA
IMO 9293753
8,084 TEU 2005
8.8
C
1120 NYK NEBULA
IMO 9337640
4,888 TEU 2007
8.8
C
1121 HOLSATIA
IMO 9233856
4,253 TEU 2003
8.8
C
1122 SINE A
IMO 9343089
2,824 TEU 2008
8.8
C
1123 LOUIS MAERSK
IMO 9190731
4,045 TEU 2001
8.8
C
1124 MSC NICOLE X
IMO 9214898
7,226 TEU 1998
8.8
C
1125 MOL EXPERIENCE
IMO 9333838
4,803 TEU 2007
8.8
C
1126 MSC GIANNA III
IMO 9152856
2,517 TEU 1998
8.8
C
1127 JAKARTA EXPRESS
IMO 9539688
4,672 TEU 2012
8.8
C
1128 PANDA 001
IMO 9290787
5,527 TEU 2005
8.9
C
1129 SEADREAM
IMO 9632832
5,023 TEU 2014
8.9
C
1130 MSC FELIXSTOWE
IMO 9290402
5,042 TEU 2005
8.9
C
1131 MSC CARMEN
IMO 9349813
4,860 TEU 2008
8.9
C
1132 MSC SENA
IMO 9116369
2,517 TEU 1996
8.9
C
1133 ZIM ATLANTIC
IMO 9440801
4,300 TEU 2009
8.9
C
1134 W KYRENIA
IMO 9211494
6,802 TEU 2001
8.9
C
1135 MSC MARITINA V
IMO 9294408
4,035 TEU 2005
8.9
C
1136 QUEBEC EXPRESS
IMO 9294836
5,512 TEU 2006
8.9
C
1137 MAERSK GARONNE
IMO 9235579
4,318 TEU 2003
8.9
C
1138 NYK METEOR
IMO 9337638
4,888 TEU 2007
8.9
C
1139 CMA CGM EIFFEL
IMO 9248112
4,367 TEU 2002
8.9
C
1140 MSC ROMA
IMO 9304447
9,200 TEU 2006
8.9
C
1141 JOLLY ROSA
IMO 9484534
4,400 TEU 2010
8.9
C
1142 MAERSK TENNESSEE
IMO 9314210
4,154 TEU 2007
8.9
C
1143 XIN DA LIAN
IMO 9234331
5,668 TEU 2003
9.0
C
1144 YM FOUNTAIN
IMO 9278090
5,551 TEU 2002
9.0
C
1145 ZIM VIRGINIA
IMO 9231808
4,800 TEU 2002
9.0
C
1146 DUBAI EXPRESS
IMO 9440825
4,300 TEU 2009
9.0
C
1147 CHIQUITA CENTURY
IMO 9339595
2,500 TEU 2008
9.0
C
1148 SEATTLE C
IMO 9360910
4,253 TEU 2007
9.0
C
1149 MAERSK JABAL
IMO 9343077
2,824 TEU 2008
9.0
C
1150 MAERSK GAIRLOCH
IMO 9235567
4,300 TEU 2003
9.0
C
Page 23 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.