Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#704 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
12.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+14% higher
C

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 274 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 659 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
701 DENIZ AKAY
IMO 9349447
10,501 2010
12.4
C
702 NORMA
IMO 9306419
8,100 2006
12.4
C
703 BBC CAMPANA
IMO 9291963
12,837 2004
12.4
C
704 KAIE
IMO 9504102
11,198 2010
12.4
C
705 CHELSEA-1
IMO 9495612
6,135 2008
12.4
C
706 BIG RISE
IMO 9509267
8,441 2006
12.5
C
707 ANDESBORG
IMO 9466324
17,294 2011
12.5
C
708 FITBURG
IMO 9250397
9,822 2002
12.5
C
709 ARKLOW MILL
IMO 9440265
14,998 2010
12.5
C
710 ARKLOW MEADOW
IMO 9440277
14,998 2010
12.5
C
711 AUGUSTA LUNA
IMO 9480124
17,371 2011
12.5
C
712 ARKLOW BEACH
IMO 9638783
8,650 2014
12.5
C
713 TEONA
IMO 9648843
7,371 2013
12.5
C
714 SEVKETTIN SONAY
IMO 9334313
14,889 2006
12.5
C
715 VIKINGBANK
IMO 9604184
11,940 2012
12.5
C
716 SIFTERI
IMO 9452323
10,588 2008
12.5
D
717 LONGERA
IMO 9988097
8,797 2024
12.6
D
718 ONEGO DUERO
IMO 9580780
9,770 2012
12.6
D
719 TAIGA DESGAGNES
IMO 9303302
17,287 2007
12.6
D
720 ARKLOW BAY
IMO 9638771
8,660 2014
12.6
D
721 SUNNANHAV
IMO 9341160
9,402 2006
12.6
D
722 BBC HUDSON
IMO 9435868
17,327 2009
12.6
D
723 ESL AFRICA
IMO 9397171
17,356 2007
12.6
D
724 ONEGO DEUSTO
IMO 9399129
9,833 2008
12.6
D
725 MARFAAM
IMO 9526100
8,429 2011
12.6
D
726 YAMATAI
IMO 9567714
19,818 2010
12.6
D
727 BBC MINNESOTA
IMO 9260378
12,840 2004
12.6
D
728 YI HUI REN HAI
IMO 9628685
12,312 2013
12.6
D
729 UMS-ALBEDO
IMO 9217163
10,629 2002
12.6
D
730 KS AIM
IMO 9261085
12,792 2005
12.7
D
731 UAL TEXAS
IMO 9542350
8,600 2013
12.7
D
732 NAVIN VULTURE
IMO 9543328
7,935 2009
12.7
D
733 SILVER LION
IMO 9281487
6,315 2005
12.7
D
734 TIBER RIVER
IMO 9650949
7,402 2014
12.7
D
735 SIGYN W
IMO 9754446
12,207 2018
12.7
D
736 SANTANA
IMO 9449388
10,853 2007
12.7
D
737 EBROBORG
IMO 9463451
11,219 2010
12.7
D
738 AMURBORG
IMO 9466336
17,294 2011
12.7
D
739 NAVIN HARRIER
IMO 9506409
7,933 2008
12.7
D
740 SLETRINGEN
IMO 9911927
8,534 2021
12.7
D
741 LONGEON
IMO 9988102
8,797 2024
12.7
D
742 ALEXIA I
IMO 9365049
10,887 2005
12.7
D
743 BOSFOR
IMO 9369083
11,121 2008
12.8
D
744 ARKLOW BEACON
IMO 9638795
8,661 2014
12.8
D
745 LADY LEYLA
IMO 9106986
11,366 1995
12.8
D
746 BR BROTHER
IMO 8418265
8,890 1985
12.8
D
747 SUNNY LYNN
IMO 9124926
11,579 1995
12.8
D
748 KALKVIK
IMO 9341172
9,402 2007
12.8
D
749 DANZIGERGRACHT
IMO 9420796
18,143 2009
12.8
D
750 INDUSTRIAL MERCHANT
IMO 9534470
10,021 2013
12.8
D
Page 15 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.