Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar
Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.
CII band distribution
1,081 at D/E2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months
Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter
Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.
Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment
| Measure | Eligible | CO₂ reduction | Capex band | Payback | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turbocharger cut-out | 1,485 | 1–3% | €80k–250k | — | vendor claim |
| Propeller redesign / replacement | 1,440 | 5–10% | €400k–1,200k | — | vendor claim |
| Bulbous bow reprofiling | 1,344 | 2–6% | €300k–900k | — | vendor claim |
| Methanol dual-fuel conversion | 965 | 5–15% | €8,000k–20,000k | — | vendor claim |
| LNG dual-fuel conversion | 795 | 15–25% | €15,000k–35,000k | — | vendor claim |
| Shaft generator / PTO | 360 | 3–6% | €500–1,500/kW | — | vendor claim |
Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.
Retrofit opportunity in this segment
Retrofit prospects — worst band first
| Vessel | Band | Age | Drop year |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k | E | 16y | 2026 |
| SEPELU · <25k | E | 26y | 2026 |
| MSC SABRINA III · <25k | E | 37y | 2026 |
| NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k | E | 18y | 2026 |
| HAMBURG TRADER · <25k | E | 21y | 2026 |
Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.
| # | Vessel | Size (TEU) | Built | Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1301 |
MSC RITA V
IMO 9313929
|
4,196 TEU | 2006 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1302 |
APL FLORIDA
IMO 9350032
|
6,350 TEU | 2008 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1303 |
MSC POLARIS
IMO 9074042
|
4,743 TEU | 1995 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1304 |
VAGA MAERSK
IMO 9778545
|
3,700 TEU | 2019 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1305 |
MSC ROMA
IMO 9304447
|
9,200 TEU | 2006 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1306 |
CMA CGM FRANCOISE SAGAN
IMO 9356696
|
6,661 TEU | 2008 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1307 |
MAERSK MONTE LINZOR
IMO 9283186
|
4,000 TEU | 2004 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1308 |
MAERSK NOKWANDA
IMO 9294393
|
4,045 TEU | 2005 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1309 |
X-PRESS SALWEEN
IMO 9862748
|
1,800 TEU | 2021 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1310 |
MSC CARPATHIA III
IMO 9253038
|
2,826 TEU | 2003 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1311 |
MAERSK OHIO
IMO 9298698
|
4,300 TEU | 2006 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1312 |
STANLEY A
IMO 9303807
|
2,824 TEU | 2003 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1313 |
SEATRADE COLOMBIA
IMO 9976238
|
23,800 | 2025 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1314 |
PORTO KAGIO
IMO 9261451
|
4,492 TEU | 2002 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1315 |
VUOKSI MAERSK
IMO 9775775
|
3,600 TEU | 2018 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1316 |
MED TRABZON
IMO 9141780
|
2,052 TEU | 1997 |
9.2
|
D |
| 1317 |
CMA CGM SINTRA
IMO 9961362
|
2,000 TEU | 2024 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1318 |
JOLLY GIADA
IMO 9484522
|
4,400 TEU | 2010 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1319 |
CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
IMO 9299795
|
8,200 TEU | 2006 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1320 |
HYUNDAI SINGAPORE
IMO 9305685
|
6,763 TEU | 2006 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1321 |
PAOLO
IMO 9389681
|
4,250 TEU | 2008 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1322 |
SC MONTREUX
IMO 9295414
|
4,132 TEU | 2005 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1323 |
SEATTLE C
IMO 9360910
|
4,253 TEU | 2007 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1324 |
CMA CGM GUARANI
IMO 9234135
|
2,470 TEU | 2002 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1325 |
OOCL KOBE
IMO 9329526
|
4,506 TEU | 2007 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1326 |
MSC MADRID
IMO 9480198
|
5,550 TEU | 2011 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1327 |
GSL MYNY
IMO 9213583
|
5,514 TEU | 2000 |
9.3
|
D |
| 1328 |
CMA CGM MONTREAL
IMO 9363417
|
2,401 TEU | 2007 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1329 |
CAPE SKAGEN
IMO 9969857
|
2,713 TEU | 2023 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1330 |
LEDA MAERSK
IMO 9190755
|
4,045 TEU | 2001 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1331 |
SHEKOU STAR
IMO 9322322
|
4,250 TEU | 2007 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1332 |
MSC HIMANSHI
IMO 9127540
|
2,006 TEU | 1997 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1333 |
GABRIEL A
IMO 9300659
|
1,676 TEU | 2004 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1334 |
MAERSK MONTANA
IMO 9305312
|
4,300 TEU | 2006 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1335 |
MSC CAPRI
IMO 9154220
|
2,456 TEU | 1998 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1336 |
PANDA 001
IMO 9290787
|
5,527 TEU | 2005 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1337 |
REMAH
IMO 9947720
|
1,692 TEU | 2022 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1338 |
ZIM VIRGINIA
IMO 9231808
|
4,800 TEU | 2002 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1339 |
KINGSTON
IMO 9389693
|
4,250 TEU | 2008 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1340 |
MSC MARIA PIA
IMO 9155107
|
2,808 TEU | 1997 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1341 |
CMA CGM SPIRIT
IMO 9372860
|
3,400 TEU | 2008 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1342 |
CMA CGM TOPAZ
IMO 9397602
|
4,300 TEU | 2009 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1343 |
MSC BREMEN
IMO 9369734
|
5,029 TEU | 2007 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1344 |
CAPE SABLE
IMO 9950131
|
2,700 TEU | 2024 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1345 |
CALI
IMO 9631101
|
3,610 TEU | 2013 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1346 |
MSC DYMPHNA
IMO 9110391
|
5,711 TEU | 1996 |
9.4
|
D |
| 1347 |
LEXA MAERSK
IMO 9190767
|
3,700 TEU | 2001 |
9.5
|
D |
| 1348 |
STADT DRESDEN
IMO 9320049
|
2,700 TEU | 2006 |
9.5
|
D |
| 1349 |
MSC ELIZABETH III
IMO 9215892
|
2,556 TEU | 2001 |
9.5
|
D |
| 1350 |
CAPE CITIUS
IMO 9848742
|
2,700 TEU | 2021 |
9.5
|
D |
Which engines power the greenest fleets?
The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.
AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.